Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Madoff agrees to give up property, art, tickets

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:20 PM
Original message
Madoff agrees to give up property, art, tickets

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/M/MADOFF_SCANDAL?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2009-03-03-11-00-28


-snip-

The trustee overseeing the liquidation of Madoff's business said the former money manager was surrendering ownership rights to his business, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, along with the company's artwork and entertainment tickets. The trustee, Irving Picard, did not specify the value of the property or say what kinds of tickets and artwork Madoff possessed.

The ultimate goal is to put some of Madoff's remaining assets in the hands of investors who lost their life savings amid the scandal, and there are growing signs that some of them could see relief in coming weeks.

-snip-

Stephen Harbeck, president of the Securities Investor Protection Corp., told The Associated Press on Tuesday that a group of 10 investors were sent forms late last week or early this week informing them whether they were eligible to receive funds from the organization. SIPC is an industry-funded group that rescues investors when brokerage firms fail, paying them up to $500,000 to recoup losses.

-snip-

"Bernie Madoff has no shortage of chutzpah to suggest as he does that his wife was not the beneficiary of his fraud. It is not only senseless, but offensive," he said.

"Moreover, it's been widely reported that she served as his bookkeeper for a number of years. If true, not only is she civilly culpable, but criminally as well," Weiss said.

Ruth Madoff has not been charged in the case.
---------------------------

Ruthie needs to be charged

and, per the title, if Madoff had not 'agreed' ??!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Viva_Daddy Donating Member (142 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Since when do we negotiate with felons as to what their punishment will be?
Give me a break. The man defrauded who knows how many people of who know how much money and he's going to tell the judges how much HE will agree to give up? This is Justice???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. This is the civil end of things
This is the liquidation of the company and distribution of the assets. On the criminal end of things, the process will be slightly different, and I don't think anyone at that time will want to be spending the weekend at Bernie's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Matariki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. On the question of how to reduce prison population in the US
some clever soul emailed CNN's Jack Cafferty with this:

"put ankle bracelets on them and let them stay at Bernie Madoff's place"

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why the fuck isn't he in jail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. white and rich?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Oh, right...damn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The 8th Amendment to the constitution
Edited on Wed Mar-04-09 07:45 PM by anigbrowl
and before that from the Haebeas corpus act and before that from Magna Carta. Basically, you're entitled to bail unless the prosecution can show you are actively dangerous to those around you. For all Madoff's apparent faults, he doesn't represent any kind of danger to the people of NY.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Excessive_bail

Edited to add that the reaason he hasn't been brought to trial yet is because there is so much paperwork to go through to prepare a case. financial/fraud cases usually take the longest to come to trial unless his lawyers try to hurry things up, which they probably won't. I can tell you for a fact that there are between 30 and 50 attorneys working on behalf of the prosecution going through his records right now, and that it's going to take them several more months just to look at all the documents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC