Redbear
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-29-07 10:21 AM
Original message |
Response to "They serve at the pleasure of the President." |
|
So did Archibald Cox.
Was Nixon's firing of him no big deal?
|
Fresh_Start
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-29-07 10:23 AM
Response to Original message |
1. which is different than "they serve to pleasure the President" |
|
which is the manner that the GOP is interpreting this phrase.
|
Cabcere
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-29-07 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Someone ought to tell the GOP |
|
Edited on Thu Mar-29-07 10:27 AM by Cabcere
that the President has a perfectly functional right hand and is capable of doing that himself. :eyes:
Edited to add: Ah, who am I kidding. That shmuck probably has trouble dressing and feeding himself, much less...well, you know. :eyes:
|
Norquist Nemesis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-29-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Sounds like a monarchy! |
yourout
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-29-07 10:30 AM
Response to Original message |
4. They do not prosecute at the pleasure of the President. |
SemperEadem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-29-07 10:31 AM
Response to Original message |
5. Response to "They serve at the pleasure of the President." |
|
"who serves at the pleasure of We the People."
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message |