Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"A history review is necessary to appreciate the changes in American society over the past 30 yrs"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 03:34 AM
Original message
"A history review is necessary to appreciate the changes in American society over the past 30 yrs"
Edited on Tue May-19-09 03:42 AM by Hannah Bell
Strike activity—the most basic indicator of class militancy—increased dramatically from the mid-1960s on, among broad sections of the industrial working class... In 1970 the total man-days lost as a result of work stoppages hit 52.7 million. That was the year of a two-month-long strike of auto workers against General Motors. It was also the year of the massacre by national guardsmen of four students at Kent State University.





These figures testified to the immense combatively of the working class throughout the 1970s. The high point of class militancy was the national coal miners’ strike of 1977-78. The strikers rejected two sell-out contracts negotiated by the union bureaucracy and defied a back-to-work order issued by President Jimmy Carter, who was acting under the provisions of the notorious Taft-Hartley Act.

This year marks the 30th anniversary of three events that signaled the beginning of a vicious counter-offensive by the ruling class against the working class.

The counter-offensive began with the appointment by President Carter, a Democrat, of Paul Volcker as chairman of the Federal Reserve... Volcker immediately set about to break the back of working class militancy by raising interest rates to unprecedented levels, thus provoking a severe recession and driving up unemployment. Under Volcker, the prime rate eventually went as high as 21.5 percent.

The second event was the announcement by Chrysler that it would shut down a major production facility in Detroit, the famous Dodge Main plant in Hamtramck that employed several thousand workers. This decision was accepted by the UAW, which ignored demands by rank-and-file workers for action to defend jobs. Opposition was strangled and the factory closed without resistance.

Finally, the UAW bureaucracy decided to grant Chrysler major concessions on wages and work rules. This began a pattern of union-management collaboration that cleared the way for subsequent attacks on the jobs, wages, working conditions, and benefits of all sections of the American working class. All these events took place even before Reagan was elected president.

The defining event of the Reagan presidency—the firing of 11,000 striking air traffic controllers, members of PATCO—sent a signal to all corporations that strike-breaking and union-busting was legitimate and would enjoy the support of the government...

In the years that followed, the AFL-CIO bureaucracy sanctioned a wave of government and corporate strikebreaking. There were no shortage of strikes during the 1980s—by Greyhound bus drivers, Continental pilots, Phelps Dodge copper miners, Hormel meatpacking workers, and AT Massey coal miners, to name only a few of the best known struggles of the 1980s. But these and virtually every other strike were isolated by the AFL-CIO and defeated...

The most telling statistical evidence of the impact of the corporate-controlled unions on the working class is the virtual disappearance of strikes in the United States...




http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/may2009/rep1-m19.shtml


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 03:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. UAW membership & assets
The UAW’s massive loss of membership has had no significant impact on the financial well being of the administration. In 2001, the union had a membership of 701,000 members. Its total assets were appraised at $1.1 billion. By 2008, its membership had fallen to 431,000—a drop of approximately 40 percent.





However, during this same period, the UAW’s assets rose to $1.2 billion.




The increase of assets has made possible a substantial increase in the income of the UAW’s administration. In 2000, the International paid its staff $89.6 million in salaries. In 2008, the salaries had grown to $100.9 million. Looking at these figures in another way, in 2000 the UAW’s central bureaucracy received $133 in income per union member. Just eight years later, the central bureaucracy received $233 in income per union member.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. K&R, right there with reality as usual.
You're one of the reasons I bother.

1979 also just happens to be the time that union "administration" transformed/transitioned from workers to "executive class".

When there are only two teams, the most cost effective way to win is to simply buy both teams, just as we have seen in our political system.
:kick: & R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. What made the union's assets increase?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 04:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Nice post, good information..
Thank you, I learned something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 05:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. k+r, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think the GOP have been dragging us back to pre-WW1
even trying the old 'royals' as rulers with people like Bush. Did not work the first time so well. We ended up with a few very rich 'royals, and a lot of poor people. As a movement like that comes to an end it always seems to fight very hard as it blows up. I think we see the same with the Middle East and all the crack pots that are doing all these crazy things trying to bring the people into some type religion that they 'think' they had. Most Middle East people are like you and I and just want a better life for their family, like us. Many of the crazy things the crazies want are not even in their bible. Our crazies do the same thing. My take is we are in the middle of a world revolution but being in the middle of it it is sort of hard to see. My grandchildren will hardly know my life as I was born in the 1930's and I think we are so better off now even with the faults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. K&R

The union leadership is more in need of reorganization than the Big Three. They have become scabs themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. In 2000 in Houston Texas the Teamster's New Union Hall was built with scab labor.
Why every Union in America didn't come down on the Teamsters at that time is beyond me. The Teamsters also alligned themselves with Bush* and backed his campaign...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. I was a steward in AFSCME, and I was-am-amazed at the lack
of courage on the part of that union. They have made a serious deal with the state to restrict any activity to grievance hearings whild completely disowning any type of militant activity on the part of any members. They have become company unions, in effect, securing labor peace in exchange for regular crumbs from the table and beer at the monthly meetings. I was very disapointed in the Union, and I wonder where the money went....

FWIW, PA State Employees were allowed to unionize around 1973, various categories of workers split into various unions so none of them got too powerful....

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. Yes, and Jimmy Carter was blamed for the damage that Volker's rate hikes
did to the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DireStrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Well, who appointed Volcker?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. But nobody actually blamed Volcker
They blamed Carter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-20-09 02:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. Great topic. It amazed me to read in Howard Zinn's History of the USA
That the Republcian Party supported the striking Pullamn Workers in Chicago back in 1893. (That was a radical move back then; the Governor of Illinois lost his office due to his leniency of the arrested, etc.)

And now neither party gives a rat's ass about us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC