elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-09-09 05:51 PM
Original message |
Of COURSE America should punish citizens who don't buy medical insurance !!1! |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-09-09 05:51 PM by elehhhhna
Can you believe we're even having this conversation?
FREEDOM ISN'T FREE, yanno.
USA! U!S!A!
|
JuniperLea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-09-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I cannot believe all the different takes on this... |
|
when we all, hopefully, have read the same thing.
Weird.
|
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-09-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I'm starting to have a whole new understanding of how difficult this must have been in the '90s |
|
I was out of the country and missed the debate as it evolved.
|
elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-09-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. debate? there wasn't one. had BC been serious about HC reform, |
|
he'd never have put HC in charge.
IMHO
|
sandnsea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-09-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
12. It was worse, as this will be |
|
And it was on top of the backlash against DADT and Waco and I don't remember what all. Fun times. I have subsidized health insurance and that is why I will be thrilled if we even get that far, provided the subsidy is as generous as Oregon's.
|
New Dawn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-09-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Forcing people to buy anything from a private company is fascist economics. |
|
It is no surprise that the DLC is promoting this. We need a real universal healthcare system like Canada and the UK has, and not a vile regurgitation of old fascist Italy's policies.
|
Thothmes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-09-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Brought to you by the "Change we can Believe in" |
hfojvt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-09-09 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
10. awesome. keep those PUMA claws sharp. |
elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-09-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Ya think? BTW, it WAS called "medical insurance" until the late 80's or so -- |
|
when it became "health" insurance. A total, swift, and very successful rebranding, btw.
Since then it's been all about denial of care. Can you say "conflict of interest"? When you consider it objectively, it's an absurd situation. Bushlike, even.
|
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-09-09 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Sounds like the HMO era rebranded it. nt |
elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-09-09 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
Captain Hilts
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-09-09 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
hfojvt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-09-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
9. except that I heard on the TV that there is a government option |
|
it's not that much different than forcing people to pay taxes to pay for single payer, and it's a step towards that single payer.
|
elehhhhna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-09-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. define "not that much different" |
stray cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-09-09 06:42 PM
Response to Original message |
14. No medical insurance no medical care - is that better? |
|
I have a hard time letting people who exercise their freedom not to participate in a national health care problem die if they get sick but I guess that is there choice and the practice of their freedom. Universal health care has to be universal.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 08:58 AM
Response to Original message |