Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gates: U.S. Ready to Defend Hawaii

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 11:37 AM
Original message
Gates: U.S. Ready to Defend Hawaii
Source: The Swamp

Reacting to reports that North Korea may be preparing to test-fire a missile toward Hawaii, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said today that he had concerns about such a launch and had ordered additional missile defense assets deployed to shore up defense of the islands.

Gates said he had ordered the deployment of a powerful sea-based radar that can help closely track the path of intercontinental ballistic missiles as well as terminal phase missile interceptors to Hawaii. Although Gates did not explicitly say that the U.S. would try to shoot down a missile test aimed in the direction of Hawaii, he noted that interceptor missiles in California and Alaska also were ready.


"The ground-based interceptors are clearly in a position to take action," Gates said. "So without telegraphing what we will do, I would just say, we are -- I think we are in a good position, should it become necessary to protect American territory."

Gates said the Defense Department was watching the North Korean situation and missile preparations closely.

"We're obviously watching the situation in the north, with respect to missile launches, very closely,'' Gates said. "And we do have some concerns, if they were to launch a missile to the west, in the direction of Hawaii.''

Theater missiles in the Pacific Ocean or the mid-course interceptors would be the most likely defenses able to shoot down a North Korean missile.

more: http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/06/gates_us_ready_to_defend_hawai.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great, Pearl Harbor, The Sequel.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is North Korea nuts?
I guess that is a rhetorical question. Does Kim Jong Il have a clue as to what would happen if he actually hit]/i] Hawaii? I can only hope this is all bluster. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Would something happen? Another war? Or diplomacy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. If NK actually launched a missle that came close
Edited on Fri Jun-19-09 11:46 AM by tekisui
or hit any US territory, or SK or Japan for that matter. It would be the end of NK. The response would be multi-lateral and it would not be talks, it would be large bombs on the capitol and every military base in NK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Multi-lateral? What countries would do that if the US was hit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Not that they would be needed, but any and all NATO members
would be willing to help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. You say they will nuke them? Why, if the US was hit?
Besides, how many NATO countries have nukes? And why would the members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization risk nuclear war when we were the ones hit? What would China do if France nuked N Korea as you say?

No, I doubt that even the US will nuke N Korea should this happen. The risk of nuclear war with China and/or Russia would preclude action in response to a nuclear attack on Hawaii.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Southpaw07 Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. In theory,
an attack on one NATO country is an attack on all. I am not sure it serves an other purpose. From Wiki:

The NATO headquarters are in Brussels, Belgium,<3> and the organization constitutes a system of collective defense whereby its member states agree to mutual defense in response to an attack by any external party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Not nukes, big bombs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I have a feeling even China would join our side
China's getting sick and tired of Kim Jong Il's craziness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. And Russia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. That's the first thing
I thought too. WTF does little kim jong dill think he's going to prove?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. Probably best to not worry about it
What's the worst that can happen?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mz Pip Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. What's the worst that can happen?
A chunk of Hawaii is anihilated and an even bigger chunk of NK is turned to glass.

That's the worst. Hopefully, it won't come to that. Hopefully it won't even be close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I "hope" you're right. Not even close is still too close with nukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. well, duh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellisonz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
12. Go Rainbow Warriors!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. Give me a boat I'll defend Hawaii
I'll crack a bottle of wine and float out to where I can see Kim's piece of shit rocket fall into the ocean about 1000 miles short.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I think you've hit on what will be the conventional wisdom on this
No worries, mate. It's North Korea after all. Carry on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. Rec'd~ Well, that makes
me feel better. NK is Nuts..they sound like the danger..that was one "axes of evil" that bushcheney didn't mess around with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cyrano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
20. "Great Leader" and his son are nuts. But not that nuts.
Hawaii is an American State. Launching a nuclear missile at Hawaii would be no different from launching one at California or New York.

Even the deluded father and son who run North Korea understand that we would turn them into a nuclear wasteland.

There's crazy, and then there's crazy. I don't believe that even they are insane enough to not realize the consequences.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-19-09 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
21. This is not a repeat from 1942, 1943, 1944, or 1945
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC