Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Settlements Delaying Generic Drugs May Be Illegal, Justice Department Says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 09:23 AM
Original message
Settlements Delaying Generic Drugs May Be Illegal, Justice Department Says
Drug Settlements May Be Illegal, U.S. Justice Department Says
By Susan Decker


July 7 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. Justice Department said settlements in which makers of brand-name drugs pay to delay the introduction of generic competitors should be considered illegal in many cases.

The department, in a filing yesterday with the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York in a case involving Bayer AG and the anthrax treatment Cipro, said courts should presume that a “pay for delay” or “reverse payment” agreement is illegal and should force the drug companies to justify why the deal was reached.

The filing puts the Justice Department in line with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission for the first time in opposing such settlements. Last month, the FTC said banning such reverse payment settlements could save American consumers $3.5 billion a year in drug costs.

“It’s a clear recognition these deals are presumptively illegal,” FTC Chairman Jonathan Leibowitz said in an interview. “That’s good news for American consumers who are paying inflated prices for much-needed drugs because of the sweetheart deals between the brand and generic companies.”

The appeals court is considering whether to allow a lawsuit that accuses Bayer AG and Barr Laboratories Inc. of using a $398 million patent settlement in 1997 to delay generic competition to Bayer’s Cipro anthrax treatment. A different appeals court upheld the agreement on patent grounds, and the Supreme Court last month refused to review that case. ............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=asN6arCrs5GY




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's about time! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whoneedstickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
2. An interesting paper that details some of these 'deals'

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/3826768/Drug-Patent-Settlements-Between-Rivals-A-Survey-C-Scott-Hemphill

All of it is anti-competitive in terms of preventing or delaying generics from entering the market
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. tWTHHappened to the enforcement of ANTI-TRUST LAW??? GEEZ!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
4. Great way to reduce the cost of health care would be
to shorten patent dates back to what they use to be. Talk about a windfall for big Pharma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. YES!
Edited on Tue Jul-07-09 10:52 AM by juno jones
After being slapped for $178 for a 25-y-o medicine which is not generic here but is not only available generic but OTC (and far cheaper) in Canada, I truly hope that the drugmakers are forced to allow generic forms of older drugs to be available here.

Bastards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC