Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Emanuel's "sufficient competion": Medicare Rx "benefit" led to MASSIVE increases in drug prices:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 11:43 AM
Original message
Emanuel's "sufficient competion": Medicare Rx "benefit" led to MASSIVE increases in drug prices:
Edited on Tue Jul-07-09 12:18 PM by Faryn Balyncd



So now Emanuel wants to use the Medicare Prescription Drug fiasco is a RATIONALE of why we should cave on the public option!

(You just can't make this stuff up.)






WHITE HOUSE OPEN TO DEAL ON PUBLIC HEALTH PLAN

"The goal is to have a means and a mechanism to keep the private insurers honest," he said in an interview. "The goal is non-negotiable; the path is" negotiable.

President Barack Obama has campaigned vigorously for a full public option. But he's also said that he won't draw a "line in the sand" over this point.

. . . . . .

Mr. Emanuel said one of several ways to meet Mr. Obama's goals is a mechanism under which a public plan is introduced only if the marketplace fails to provide sufficient competition on its own. He noted that congressional Republicans crafted a similar trigger mechanism when they created a prescription-drug benefit for Medicare in 2003. In that case, private competition has been JUDGED SUFFICIENT and the public option has never gone into effect.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124692407982802911.html#mod=rss_Politics_And_Policy





But the anti-competitive Medicare Prescription Drug "Benefit" was followed by MASSIVE increases in drug prices!

(And these increases effect ALL Americans, not only Medicare beneficiaries):



http://www.webmd.com/news/20070306/aarp-prescription-dr...




Since Emanuel thinks the Medicare Rx Drug "benefit" has a "sufficient" stimulation of competitive prices, what effect on INSURANCE PREMIUMS can be expected by a health-care "reform" stripped of a public option?


Such a fatally flawed bill will be a massive step BACKWARDS, and needs to be DEFEATED!










Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. The "non-negotiation" clause has been generally excoriated - but have they repealed that part
of the Drug bill? I don't think so. If not, why not?

(By the way, your WebMD link doesn't work)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
2. So much promise, so much capital wasted
"President Barack Obama has campaigned vigorously for a full public option. But he's also said that he won't draw a "line in the sand" over this point."


We thought we elected just what we needed to deal with the increasing crisis facing everyday people, another FDR who would stand up to the corporate interests and push to keep his promises.

........instead we ended up with another Jimmy Carter.

sigh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. If we wanted someone who would have stood up to the corporate interest, Obama was the WRONG choice.
That is painfully obvious now. Should have been during the campaign. Too late now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Well, between an unknown in Obama, and the known corporatist in Hillary
There was really only one choice in the primaries.

(Sadly, Kucinich wasnt an option.)

Im still hopeful Obama will realize too many of his advisors are representing their corporate buds instead of the people and change course, but that hope dims with every passing day, every new position filled with still more corporate shills.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
3. I listened to Thom Hartmann this AM on a Portland radio station.
Apparently Emanuel spoke about "triggers" in a NYT interview, but during an interview in Russia Obama said any bill MUST include a public plan. Thom said he thought Obama may be playing chess again by inviting the Pubs to join the discussions and stop saying no to everything, with the full intent that in the end he will be able to say I reached out to Pubs at every step and they refused, so now we'll just go it alone MY WAY.

I've thought this was a possibility for quite a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. A trigger is a stall to push the issue forward to another day
Hoping that they can find a way to defeat it then. There are many that just want to make it through the populace uproar till people fall back asleep, then they can go back to full stealing mode again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Recommended.
That bill infuriated me. It was meant to give pharma more profits, else why would they have the stupid doughnut hole?

Idiots.

Most complicated idiotic bill ever, and don't get me started on the Medicare Advantage plans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abumbyanyothername Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. To put it in terms you will understand, Rahm
F you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. Rahm Emmanuel only pretends to be a democrat.
He is DLC/NDN all the way. Fucking infiltrator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
10. Just think....there are two Emanuels helping to run things.
Rahm and Zeke

I knew the day that Obama chose Rahm to "get his back"....that real change was out of the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC