Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House: Acquitted Detainees May Not Be Released

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:48 PM
Original message
White House: Acquitted Detainees May Not Be Released
Source: The Raw Story

The Obama Administration signaled Tuesday it may keep terrorism detainees even if they’ve been acquitted.

Chief Department of Defense lawyer Jeh Johnson told a Senate committee “that releasing a detainee who has been tried and found not guilty was a policy decision officials would make based on their estimate of whether the prisoner posed a future threat,” according to a report by Jess Bravin in the Wall Street Journal.

Bravin notes that the Bush administration maintained the same stance, “but its legality was never tested.”


Spencer Ackerman at The Washington Independent characterized Johnson’s response as moving the Obama administration “into new territory from a civil liberties perspective.”

“Asked by Sen. Mel Martinez (R-Fla.) the politically difficult but entirely fair question about whether terrorism detainees acquitted in courts could be released in the United States, Johnson said that ‘as a matter of legal authority,’ the administration’s powers to detain someone under the law of war don’t expire for a detainee after he’s acquitted in court,” Ackerman wrote.

“If you have authority under the law of war to detain someone” under a Supreme Court ruling, Johnson remarked, “that is true irrespective of what happens on the prosecution side.”

more: http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/07/07/white-house-acquitted-detainees-may-not-be-released/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoCalNative Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. WTF?
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Exactly.
:o :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. After we give them a fair trial we'll hold them anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fat Tony Scalia must be having an orgasm over this
It's right up his alley

I'm still waiting for that change I voted for...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. Where did the Bill of Rights go?
Are there ANY would be leaders who still hold true to our original documents?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Then these are like Stalin's show trials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
30. Mark your calendar
Obama's been prez less than six months and his admin is getting compared to Stalin.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. 100 years from now, what do you think the world will think about these kinds of trials?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Would we let Bin Laden go if we couldn't convict him?
or let Saddam go if he was found not guilty? I certainly have problems with the idea of detaining someone who was not convicted but some people you know are guilty you have to set free. Michael Jackson was found not guilty - but would you have let him work with children?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. We live in the real world so we know Bin Laden wouldn't be acquitted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. really?
well, if what you mean is that there would never be a trial at all, or that there would never be a trial if they weren't certain of the outcome, then i'd agree.

but in terms of an actual fair trial with hard evidence and everything, i'm not so sure. the public has been given zero hard evidence of his direct involvement in just about anything, only his various tapes, the authenticity of which are in doubt, have any credible evidence at all, the rest is just a huge pile of accusations.

i'm certainly open to the possibility that the government has mountains of presumably highly classified rock solid evidence against him, but even that might not be usable at trial.

so it's not clear to me that an actual trial would result in conviction.

also remember that you have to find 12 idiots who have never heard of bin laden and have no negative bias against him....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #23
38. You can't be serious. Americans have been frightened to the point where even
Edited on Wed Jul-08-09 09:14 AM by mmonk
they don't mind innocent Muslim men being held without trial or proof of a crime much less having Bin Laden on trial. I will stand up for the Constitution and the rule of law. It worked against men much more dangerous on a large scale scale such as the Nazis. Giving up on the Constitution, the rule of law, and freedom is the main reason I'm struggling with my own party right now. I can't be fooled into giving it all up on political generated fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Holy Shit! Is bin Laden in Gitmo?!?!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. YES
We are either a nation of laws or we aren't. Once someone can be imprisoned indefinitely on the order of the President, we've blurred the most important line separating us from a dictatorship.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Dare I say it?
Bush III
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luciferous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
37. I'm starting to think so nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. God damn anyone here who tries to defend THIS!
ANYONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. See post #8.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I can't see post #8.
But that confirms the accuracy of my ignore list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. LOL
enough said..

:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. Hear, hear. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. It's a great decision
Edited on Tue Jul-07-09 06:55 PM by noamnety
because he's only been in office 6 months.

(sorry, it's the best I can do here. ;) )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R USA! USA ! USA!
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThirdWorldJohn Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. So Obama makes tjhe promise to close camp Delta and lets some underling tell it like it really is.
Johnson also signaled that Guantanamo might remain open after January 2010: “You can’t prosecute some significant subset of 220 people before January,” he said. The Obama Administration plans to continue to detain some of those inmates suspected of terrorist ties, “whether at Guantanamo or somewhere else.”

http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/07/07/white-house-acquitted-detainees-may-not-be-released/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
justabob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. surreal
I can't find the words to express my outrage....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. I can't express my outrage, either.
But I can sum up the situation: We've been had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #20
35. yes that sums it up pretty good IMHO! Thank you. nt
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohheckyeah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. I think the administration is going to take a lot
of heat for this move. I would love to hear the justification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Heat from whom?
The M$M?

It is to laugh..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohheckyeah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. Liberals. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Both of them?
Liberals make cats look like sardines when it comes to being individualistic..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tpsbmam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. He's been pretty disdainful of liberals since 1/20 -- not sure how much
influence we hold at this point. Which does NOT mean that we should stop holding him to his word -- it's become crystal clear he is going to need constant challenging & pushing to do the right thing in a number of different areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
27. Chess, Pony, Purity, Only Five Months, Better Than Bush, Better Than McCain
I can't WAIT to hear the excuses for this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
31. Are they trying to say the detainees, if not proven guilty ...
... would be considered prisoners of war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
33. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
34. a sad k&r! nt
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luciferous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-07-09 09:50 PM
Response to Original message
36. K&R
I'm so disgusted by him and his administration... I don't know how people can continue to defend them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Holly_Hobby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
39. Can't have them showing up on TV with scars on their penises n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC