Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Britain's National Health Service: Simple, sensible and civilized

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 01:33 PM
Original message
Britain's National Health Service: Simple, sensible and civilized
from the Los Angeles Times:



Britain's National Health Service: Simple, sensible and civilized
A former NHS patient has some advice for Americans skeptical of single-payer, government-run healthcare: You'll get over it.

By Clancy Sigal
July 5, 2009


For the first couple of years I lived in Britain, I was an illegal immigrant from the United States, visaless with an expired passport and looking over my shoulder all the time. Even so, from the very first day I arrived at Victoria Station in London, suffering from bronchitis, I was accepted in the NHS -- the national health scheme, we called it -- no questions asked and no ID required.

After I'd become a legal resident, I asked my doctor why he had taken me, almost literally off the boat, with so little fuss. Weren't foreigners a drain on his time and the National Health Service? He shrugged. "If you come here with a contagious disease, we don't want you infecting the rest of us. So of course we give you medical care. Purely selfish on our part."

For three decades I used and, being of a hypochondriacal nature, exploited the British medical system without paying a farthing except for the taxes taken out of my wages as a working journalist. And that single-payer, socialistic, government-run, bureaucratized, heavily used, nationalized health system served me -- and 50 million others -- very well. In need, I saw many doctors, with no money ever changing hands. There was nothing to sign, hardly any papers to shuffle. My primary-care physician ran his "surgery," his office, with the help of only one receptionist whose job it was to arrange appointments.

My doctor's waiting room in his storefront office was by American standards shockingly casual, even a trifle seedy. In what was then a rigid class society, the waiting room was also a lesson in democracy where duchesses and dustmen, old and young, rich and poor, waited their turn. It wasn't perfect. There was the occasional misdiagnosis, crowded hospital ward, sleepy student nurse. But it worked. ...........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.latimes.com/features/health/medicine/la-oe-sigal5-2009jul05,0,6570986.story




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well this isn't what is being suggested
Nor are the three choices in the intentionally distracting poll on the page. The "liberal" LA Times strikes again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pkdu Donating Member (621 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. This much-maligned ( at least over here) system extended the lives of
both my maternal and paternal grandparents way beyond what their bank accounts or the tough lives they lived would have gotten them here. Easily 15-20 years each I would estimate. They all had very hard lives and in some cases didn't have healthy lifestyles (read- smoking/eating)...but once they reached retirement age , with no private pension , the state gave them back some of what they had paid through weekly taxes on wages in the form of a small pension , subsidized housing and free medical care.

Were they always seen instantly? No...but they got very good care and didn't have to worry one bit about insurance or co-pays or any of that shit....they had enough to worry about.

Socialized medicine ?..if you say so...I say bring it on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Here's another view of the NHS from Readers' Responses in the NY Times
. . .Another major difference between the US and UK system is that in the UK. they have an excellent health education and prevention system. The UK employs Health Visitors whose primary task is to educate and monitor the well being of the nation’s subjects. E.G. When an infant is discharged with its mother from hospital, the H.V's responsibility is to check that infant throughout its developmental life stages. If at any time, that infant does fails to match developmental markers, a referral to a specialist is arranged. If a baby is not responding to sound, it is referred to an otolaryngologist for follow up tests and if proved to be Deaf, then, the peripatetic teacher of the Deaf is recruited to work with the child and its parents. Specialist social workers with Deaf people are also brought in to play to carry out an assessment of need for various aids and adaptations that that child and its parent might benefit from. The Health visitor is also charged with visiting the elderly at determined points of their lives and again, an assessment of need is carried out to enable them to maintain a healthy, safe living environment within the community for as long as they are able. Support teams are also called in to assist with varying needs of that elderly person. This could include assessment of Social Security benefits, disabled living allowances, environmental equipment for the home and these assessments are carried out by Social Workers and Occupational Therapists. If a person is released from a mental institution or psychiatric ward, this is only done after a full case discussion and community nursing and social work support has be set in place to ensure a successful rehabilitation back into the community.

Granted, it is accepted that there are waiting lists for procedures. However, these are usually there for folk requiring “Elective” procedures. Generally, all emergency and critical care needs are addresses immediately. Do we Americans enjoy this level of care? I think not. Isn't America a rather backward third world country, seems like it to me?. . .
---------------------
This is a long comment and can be found in its entirety as Comment #34 at

http://community.nytimes.com/comments/www.nytimes.com/2009/07/08/business/economy/08leonhardt.html?sort=recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadicalTexan Donating Member (607 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. I lived in the UK for four years and used the NHS
Never had a problem. Had a biopsy, as well as Xrays. Got free birth control. Never had to wait more than a couple of days for a non-essential appointment, same as here. Never had to wait more than 15 minutes in the waiting room (NOT like here). Efficient. Caring doctors and nurses. No over-reliance on prescription drugs as first solution. Loved it. Loved it. Loved it.

$0.02
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. How to do it:
"Recently, the American Medical Assn. responded with skepticism to President Obama's plea for healthcare reform. In Britain, too, the massed ranks of the medical profession at first fought bitterly against a "socialized" service covering all from cradle to the grave. But Labor's health minister, a firebrand from the mining valleys, Aneurin Bevan, brought them into line with a mixture of enticements and threats.

The NHS was, and is, a classically English compromise, in which individual doctors are independent contractors paid by the government according to the number of their patients. Doctors are free to remove patients from their list, and patients are free to go elsewhere. Once ideology was laid aside and the system got working, it was actually quite simple."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "Once ideology was laid aside and the system got working, it was actually quite simple." K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr blur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. The NHS saved my life and continues to do so.
I have MS and take 8 prescription drugs a day. Doesn't cost me a penny. All visits to the home from OTs, physios etc. cost me nothing. All equipment provided in my home - hoist, motorised wheelchair, shower chair, ramps, rails, bathroom equipment cost me nothing.

When I was working, I made my contributions via tax - now I get the benefits.

Yes, I'm a Socialist - always been proud to call myself one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. we can only dream....
America is too backward to invest in the health of it's people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. my former British girlfriend use to complain about getting her NHS appointments
Edited on Wed Jul-08-09 04:39 PM by Hissyspit
until I explained that in the U.S. not everyone is covered, you might wait even LONGER, you might not be able to get a referral at all, you might end up in the ER, you might have to pay for ALL of it and it could ruin you financially and cause you to lose your home, or you might not get the health care at all because it was that or eat.

She was horrified at our system.

She continued to complain about going to the doctor under the British system, because that is human nature, but she was truly HORRIFIED at our system.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. Yeah, but we have Health Savings Accounts, courtesy of Newty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC