Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What are the odds that two Repubs, both named King, (Steve and Peter) would be the two dumbest ...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
11 Bravo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 08:49 PM
Original message
What are the odds that two Repubs, both named King, (Steve and Peter) would be the two dumbest ...
Edited on Wed Jul-08-09 08:52 PM by 11 Bravo
mother-fuckers in Congress? The NY dunce has proclaimed an individual who has never been convicted of anything to be a pedophile. (And I don't give a flying fuck what you may think about it, as matter of LAW, he was innocent, and an individual respnsible for actually passing laws should know that.) The Iowa asshole is the only member of the House of Representatives to vote against a resolution recognizing the (well-established and irrefutable) fact that slave labor contributed to the construction of the U. S. Capitol.
Again, what are the odds?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Putting an R after your name
automatically reduces your IQ by 50%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are they cousins?
That branch might be worth pruning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. self hating racists? Growing up with the same last name as MLK must have warped them
and just as a matter of fact.....


as a matter of LAW he was found not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt (not innocent)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Both Republicans? About 3 to 5.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peacetrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Amazing isn't it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's a sign from the Universe
that our forefathers were absolutely right in breaking away from the monarchy....................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
handmade34 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Old fearful white men
that are struggling to stop the 21st and the loss of their flagrant position of power...

I was appalled and greatly offended by Peter King's statement about the excessive coverage of Michael Jackson. Peter King is devoid of any understanding about people and culture. Music is extraordinarily powerful and Michael Jackson was an extraordinary medium offering his gift.

The sadness is that Peter King and Steve King are obviously poor representatives for their constituents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. OK, MJ was never convicted
but that's only because we have star-struck juries, and the best justice system money can buy.

Regardless of whether or not Peter King is an asshole (I happen to think he is) he's right about this particular "artist". MJ's batshit crazy, even if he's not a 'convicted' pedophile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. So every jury in the LA area that happens to rule in favor of a famous person is star struck?
Bullshit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Most of them, I'd say
I still remember that woman who wore the Star Trek outfit to the court to serve on a jury of a famous person. Many people gravitate to that place to associate with fame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
handmade34 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-08-09 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. it would be a very sad world indeed if we wrote off
all the 'crazy' characters in this world. I happen to think Michael Jackson was off the charts when it came to being different. Most of my favorite people are and most of them are loving, caring, generous and interesting.

What makes you think Peter King is 'right' about this particular artist? We don't know first hand if any child was ever damaged in any way because of him. The best proof that Rep King can come up with is that young children slept in the same bed with Michael Jackson, that is not the definition of a pedophile. I don't know the truth of Michael Jackson's life anymore than you or Rep King does. I mourn the loss of soldiers, I mourn the loss of innocent children, I mourn the loss of a great talent, I mourn the loss of people I care about. I have a pretty good feeling that no one anywhere suffered from lack of up to date news about Obama or the Coup in Hondouras because of the coverage of Michael Jackson and people were free to turn off the TV or radio if they chose to. I was out a couple of days ago listening in the car to a right wing radio station in San Diego and noted that the two men talked the entire time I was listening- about the excessive coverage of Michael Jackson and how it was just too much. For goodness sake, they were doing the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. If it looks like a duck
walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck.

Eccentric people add spice to life, but the Neverland Ranch goes beyond quirky. I refuse to give in to the idea that pedophiles are just another misunderstood sexual minority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-09-09 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
13. Kind of the same as two Democrats named Nelson
They rank up there too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC