Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I wade in.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FredStembottom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:02 AM
Original message
I wade in.
Edited on Fri Jul-10-09 11:09 AM by FredStembottom
I wasn't going to comment on the wildfire currently burning through DU canyon.....
but I feel compelled to ask folks to take a look at the Greatest Page today (Friday) and see what it has become.

It has become: useful, rapidly informative, (mostly) hierarchical as to what Progressives need to see and are most likely to want to know about in a quick read.

Whatever else the-new-system is, early results say it's like, totally, freakin' effective!

Gone are the Fuck X!, Fuck Y!, Fuck Z! postings (and their generic sister What the Fuck!) which are welcome here at DU.... but don't belong on any kind of Greatest Page for the simple reason that if you've read one X-is-a-douchebag post, you've read 'em all.

I come to DU to possibly spot someone else's inspired solution to the massive corruption of our government in general and our Party in particular.

And, suddenly, today, the Greatest Page feels like a help in that direction - as opposed to a random list of hollers.

And so, for such encouraging and swift results, I give the Admins this laurel ... and hearty handshake! :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Common Sense Party Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. Amen.
It's a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. A "hardy" handshake?
You mean, from THIS guy?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredStembottom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Oh, crap! I ruined my own joke!
edit edit edit...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. Hey... That Was A LAUREL And Hardy Handshake !!!


:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Ooops.
WHOOSH over my head!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. I didn't se a single "Rec This Thread If You..." post on the Greatest
That alone proves the effectiveness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Absolutely, "Rec if" threads were almost always useless IMO
Somebody could write their dissertation on this new rec/unrec system. The data and result is really interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. i agree, i find it funny the outrage this has caused for a tiny handful of posters...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. So far so good...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. 'Scuse me while I whip this out
Kudos for the Blazing Saddles reference! I think it's too early to say whether the new system will work out once people have got used to it, but I'm hopeful. I rarely bothered with the GP before, because it seemed pretty worthless, but it does seem to have improved for the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredStembottom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
17. ...for the moment.......
...is right. I am still waiting to see if Rec/UnRec wars are possible.
Or would the rest of us even notice one going on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. That's what I thought too. I went to the Greatest Page
and saw some interesting posts there.

Frankly, it was the first time I went there since the single time one of my OPs (about Franken news) got recced to it.

I just don't use the Greatest Page.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. And for GD, it means ratings that have real meaning.
A cursory look at the main page of GD reveals a number of threads which have truly gained the support of a majority of DUers who have rated such threads.

Gone is the ability of any five posters to move a thread onto the Great Page. If one is really concerned about the alleged troll problem, nothing allowed a handful of them to manipulate the system like the 5 Recs and you're in system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. It has become (principally) a useful liberal news feed.
There is less discussion and much less controversy, but if we want it to be a liberal news feed, then we got what we wanted.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FredStembottom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Maybe just the Greatest Page has changed to that?
Which would be appropriate for that page, no?

Won't discussion and controversy carry on as always in GD, GDP etc.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. What the Greatest Page has become is fine, if that's what the admins want.
Lively discussions (mostly about the unrec feature itself) continue in GD. And that's fine too.

Personally, I like the controversial topics and lively discussion. Those threads will be slightly less visible now, and that will make it slightly harder to get a lively discussion going.

Again, if that's what the admins want, it's fine. I just want to be clear about what the unrec function does.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. deleted
Edited on Fri Jul-10-09 11:27 AM by Bicoastal
delete
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
15. Great, isn't it? I had stopped going to the GP because of all the crap. Good to go back. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
16. yeah
I was looking forward to unrec-ing a bunch of fluff, but others beat me to it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
20. When the whistle blows ... four drum beats...take off with the right foot.
It's great to all be in step ain't it? I am not certain how this will all work out but I do love these posts that are so happy. Time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC