Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is Congresswoman Giffords muddying the health care reform water...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 09:47 PM
Original message
Is Congresswoman Giffords muddying the health care reform water...
...or do I misunderstand the definition of the term "public option?" From a canned letter out of her office, is this excerpt: "I support the idea of allowing people to choose from a menu of competitively priced options, also known as a public option."

I thought that the public option was a single payer/universal health care option that's separate from the so-called "competitively priced options," which are essentially no different than the major insurance company plans that currently rip us off. Can someone please help me out here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, the public option had nothing to do with single payer as you thought
Single means...well, single. As long as other insurers cover the same thing, its not single payer.

But, the reality is, the language they used was OPTION. Option can mean anything. So in the end, the public-option-or-nothingers are getting an option, but it just mightnot be what they envisioned. Bait and switch. Next time, ask better questions and demand better answers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This was in an update sent to her email list, not part of a response to an inquiry by me.
But what I'm trying to grasp is whether or not the term "public option" means coverage similar to the UK's National Health Service model, for example. Because, if it does mean that, either she misunderstands the issue or she's deliberately misinterpreting "public option." And neither of those two possibilities are acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. It doesnt actually mean anything
Its a new fabricated term. Everyone thought it might mean a public insurance entity that anyone could enroll in, so they got behind it. It really is ambiguous and could fairly be applied to anything run or oversighted by the government. Sad but true really. Since the start of this debate, the Democrats wont draw any lines in the sand, not even insofar as language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Sigh...
I am so naive to have ever thought that politics as usual would become history once my party was back in control. I guess, in that rarefied atmosphere of the Hill, there are no Ds or Rs--only $s.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. It still might turn out to be better than status quo
It will never make health care affordable on its own, but it may make it a bit better if all the cards fall into place. It could also be worthless. Who knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC