Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Contested Waters: A Social History of Swimming Pools in America(Racism & Classism)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 10:25 PM
Original message
Contested Waters: A Social History of Swimming Pools in America(Racism & Classism)
Edited on Fri Jul-10-09 10:30 PM by RamboLiberal
In his new book(2007-sucks to be 2 years too early), Contested Waters: A Social History of Swimming Pools in America, historian Jeff Wiltse traces the evolution of municipal pools in America from the late 1860s to today. Focusing on northern cities like Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Louis, Wiltse finds that pools gradually became hotbeds of social change.

-----

Fifty-three years later, the scene at a municipal pool in Youngstown, Ohio, was quite different. A Little League baseball team had won the 1951 city championship and decided to celebrate at the local pool. The large facility was situated within the sylvan beauty of the city's Southside Park, not in a residential slum. The pool itself was surrounded by a broad deck and grassy lawn, both of which provided swimmers ample space to play games or lie in the sun. The pool was clearly intended to promote leisure, not cleanliness. To celebrate their baseball victory, coaches, players, parents, and siblings showed up at the pool, but not all were admitted. One player, Al Bright, was denied entrance because he was black. The lifeguards forced him to sit on the lawn outside the fence as everyone else played in the pool. The unwritten rule was clear, one guard told the coach, "Negroes are not permitted in the pool area." After an hour had passed, several parents pleaded with the guards to let Al into the pool for at least a couple of minutes. Finally, the supervisor relented; Al could "enter" the pool as long as everyone else got out and he sat inside a rubber raft. As his teammates and other bystanders looked on, a lifeguard pushed him once around the pool. "Just don't touch the water," the guard constantly reminded him, "whatever you do, don't touch the water."

How is it that so much had changed in those fifty years? At its heart, this book answers that question. It explains how and why municipal swimming pools in the northern United States were transformed from austere public baths—where blacks, immigrants, and native-born white laborers swam together, but men and women, rich and poor, and young and old did not—to leisure resorts, where practically everyone in the community except black Americans swam together. As the opening vignettes suggest, this social, cultural, and institutional transformation occurred during the first half of the twentieth century and involved the central developments of the period: urbanization, the erosion of Victorian culture, Progressive reform, the emergence of popular recreation, the gender integration and racial segregation of public space, and the sexualization of public culture. In short, the history of swimming pools dramatizes America's contested transition from an industrial to a modern society.

But the story does not end there. A second social transformation occurred at municipal swimming pools after midcentury. Black Americans challenged segregation by repeatedly seeking admission to whites-only pools and by filing lawsuits against their cities. Eventually, these social and legal protests desegregated municipal pools throughout the North, but desegregation rarely led to meaningful interracial swimming. When black Americans gained equal access to municipal pools, white swimmers generally abandoned them for private pools. Desegregation was a primary cause of the proliferation of private swimming pools that occurred after the mid-1950s. By the 1970s and 1980s, tens of millions of mostly white middle-class Americans swam in their backyards or at suburban club pools, while mostly African and Latino Americans swam at inner-city municipal pools. America's history of socially segregated swimming pools thus became its legacy.

Throughout their history, municipal pools served as stages for social conflict. Latent social tensions often erupted into violence at swimming pools because they were community meeting places, where Americans came into intimate and prolonged contact with one another. People who might otherwise come in no closer contact than passing on the street, now waited in line together, undressed next to one another, and shared the same water. The visual and physical intimacy that accompanied swimming made municipal pools intensely contested civic spaces. Americans fought over where pools should be built, who should be allowed to use them, and how they should be used.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=10407533

And Valley Swim Club was founded out of these waters.

The club, which is unaffiliated with the Huntingdon Valley Country Club, is just outside Philadelphia's city limits and was founded in 1954, when pressure was emanating from within the city to integrate pools. In 1953, State Sen. Charles R. Weiner (R., Phila.) had offered a bill to desegregate all public pools. In 1951, the Rev. Harrison DeShields of South Philadelphia sued pool operators across the city and suburbs, alleging discrimination.

The new allegations against the Valley Club prompted questions of whether it was resisting decades of racial progress.

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/20090710_Pool_president__Safety__not_race__is_the_issue.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Valley Club isn't whites only. So that would be a fail, would it not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Bet it was white only back in the 50's when it was founded
Edited on Fri Jul-10-09 10:57 PM by RamboLiberal
Maybe there wasn't a hard rule, but there would be a social rule.

That was the way with pool clubs, golf clubs, hell even private shooting ranges for the most part remain mostly white.

Oh yeah now they will let in some of the minorities who "made it" or who may work with a member and can be "vouched" for.

I remember riding through a county park in Western PA in the early 60's as things began to desegregate and having my parents point out to me what was the "black" pool and what was the "white" pool.

I don't know about Philadelphia but I know in Western PA racism is alive and very well. Murtha damn well knew what he was talking about.

BTW, check out the cache of their site - looks pretty darn white.

http://web.archive.org/web/20070814083246/http://www.thevalleyclub.com/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Everything was segregated. Many things still are.
Oh yeah now they will let in some of the minorities who "made it" or who may work with a member and can be "vouched" for.

Private clubs are segregated. That's why they are private. The bottom line has always been economics. What would be the most upsetting thing to white people before black people were even a consideration? White people who had money, who still didn't belong. "Nouveau riche", "rich white trash", keeping "those people" out has been as much a part of the game as keeping the place white. What's more annoying than George Bush? George Bush isn't technically white trash, due to his mother's ancestry, but I don't want him in the club, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's why I don't like private clubs all that much
Hotbeds of discrimination.

I'm glad there's a Tiger Woods who beats the crap out of the white male golfers. 40-50 years ago they'd have done their damndest to keep him off their courses.

A lot of change has happened in past decade or two - but it wasn't that long ago even money couldn't buy your way in to many of these clubs if you were the wrong color, religion, or sexual orientation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-10-09 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I don't make decisions on that basis.
I'm not saying that's better or worse, or that I am indifferent, and I am quite aware of the role of white privilege in my feelings on the subject. In St. Pete, black people have what is for all intents and purposes their own public swimming pool while both of the "white" swimming pools are actually integrated to about the proper levels for the municipality. I have no desire to use the black swimming pool, but then I don't live in St Pete and have never used any of their swimming pools. Not surprisingly, St Pete Beach public swimming pool is, well, I can't honestly remember if I have seen a black person there or not. One of the functions here is that the public pool in the black neighborhood is somehow free, while all other pools have admission charges.

There is also a "black gym" in St Pete, and the Uhuru actually wanted to call it that. The city paid for it, and I suppose it's a public facility but I would be about as welcome there as I might be expected to be in a place the Uhuru named after a criminal who was killed while trying to run down a cop.

Other than that everyone seems to get along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC