Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ATTENTION ALL GLBT DUers!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yoyossarian Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:10 PM
Original message
ATTENTION ALL GLBT DUers!
Edited on Sun Jul-12-09 02:11 PM by yoyossarian
Please check out this thread and let me know what you think;
I believe I'm on to something here...

The Perfect Litmus Test for the Wonderful New Unrec Feature!

Please post responses on that thread; this one's really just a pointer, but
the other's an experiment and, I think, something of real moment...

Edited for too-fast typing!




Great tee-shirts, buttons and such at
Laugh City!


President Evil Online
has risen from the grave!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Still pushing that which is false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yoyossarian Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. So sure of yourself, aren't you?
The experiment is ongoing... thank you for taking part in it!




Great tee-shirts, buttons and such at
Laugh City!


President Evil Online
has risen from the grave!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChimpersMcSmirkers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Why have one worthless thread when you can have two?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. It's kinda funny - doubling down on being wrong rather than simply admit error...
Edited on Sun Jul-12-09 02:41 PM by BlooInBloo
And trying to escalate it into all of gay DU in the process.

Only in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yoyossarian Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Sorry, Bloo...
But I'm not the one saying that THIS IS A FACT... you, however,
are doing just that; you're telling me I'm wrong wrong wrong
when in FACT my hypothesis has only begun to be tested...

Which does NOT necessarily mean that you are anti-gay; it may
mean that you are very pro-unrec, or it could be that you're
just not in the mood to give a serious question serious
consideration today...

I am making an observation, and hypothesizing as to why it seems
(to me, anyway) that the character of the Greatest Page has
changed so much from, say, several weeks ago...

This is NOT an indictment of DU as largely homophobic; all it
takes is a small but diligent group of homophobes to search out
such threads and apply their new super-powers of recommend-negation
to effectively keep many LGBT posts off the Greatest Page... which is
a lot like censorship, in that it limits exposure to these posts to
a considerable degree...

ANY fringe group will suffer similarly under such a system...

Personally, I simply found the old way of doing things much more, oh,
I don't know... what's the word I'm looking for?

Oh yes... democratic.




Great tee-shirts, buttons and such at
Laugh City!


President Evil Online
has risen from the grave!




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. *yawn*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yoyossarian Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. For once we are in agreement!
Right back atcha, baby...




Great tee-shirts, buttons and such at
Laugh City!


President Evil Online
has risen from the grave!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. A hypothesis is an educated, testable guess, not something you pull out of the air. The answer is
Edited on Mon Jul-13-09 12:29 AM by lindisfarne
obvious, as I showed in #57 at the link in your OP.

The thread you link to in OP, and its topic, cannot be considered an experiment of any kind because you failed to follow the scientific process, which requires logic, preliminary research, and the ability to realize, after doing a tiny bit of research that the answer is crystal clear, EVEN IF IT CONFLICTS WITH YOUR PERSONAL BELIEFS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. You said it. This OP's MO reminds me of a story Abraham Lincoln told about a card-shark & gambler
back in Illinois.

Suspecting one of his opponents sitting across the table of cheating, he whipped out a blade and sliced the guy's thumb off.

"If you're not hiding an Ace of Clubs under your shirt, I apologize," the card-shark said.

This OP's threads on this topic are sorta like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pearl Vision Center has a 2-for-1 special this week, check them out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Tiger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. What is your point other than to attempt to stir up trouble?
I haven't seen any women's "issue posts" on the GP either, nor any atheist "issue posts" there "of late." That goes for other "issue posts" for other groups, such as African-Americans, environmentalists, senor citizens, etc.. So what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Your experiment is poorly designed
1. The premise of your original post, as I understand it, is essentially that GLBT threads are being disadvantaged by the new un-rec system.

2. You started a thread, presumably with the goal of stimulating either recs or unrecs, as a way of testing your hypothesis.

The problem will come with analyzing the results:

a. If you get many recs, presumably this will confirm your hypothesis (DUers will rec your thread because they agree with your hypothesis, or want to support your cause).

b. If you get many unrecs, presumably this will also confirm your hypothesis (DUers will unrec your threads because they want to disadvantage your cause).

You've designed an experiment with no possible outcome that would disprove your hypothesis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. It's a feature, not a bug.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. You're violating the rules by creating a new thread to redirect to your previous (incorrect) idea
posted <2 hours earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. Yet that post still reads
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm a gay woman and I'm sorry, but
I just don't see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iggo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. I kinda see the point, but...
Edited on Sun Jul-12-09 02:46 PM by Iggo
...what's the experiment?

EDIT: Forget it. I missed the point. And now I see there is no experiment other than "Rec this thread". Sorry, Charlie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. Your threads aren't recommended because they're weak and inaccurate.
You misrepresent the status of the Greatest Page and its content.

You do a poor job of presenting the arguments you make.

You purposely offend and then take umbrage at those who think your rant is less than worthy of recommending.

Others who start GLBT topics don't have these problems because they're not you and they don't make the mistakes you make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Harsh, but your point makes sense.
I can't say much, I too tend to be harsh and often have no qualms being so.

Usually being harsh about things instead of being harsh at people directly, with only one or two exceptions if I get angry enough. (e.g. I'll vehemently badmouth a car and let others call me a, what was it, "douse bag"? I usually douse chicken in my "Shake'n'Bake" bag packets, but whatever... if it makes them feel better, more power to them...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
19. I'm going to avoid the unrec controversy and do this the old fashioned way:
Your thread sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yoyossarian Donating Member (821 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-12-09 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Such bitter and relentless vehemence!
You make my point better than I could ever hope to do...




Great tee-shirts, buttons and such at
Laugh City!


President Evil Online
has risen from the grave!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC