proud2BlibKansan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-12-09 09:58 PM
Original message |
Claire McCaskill won't support an investigation of Cheney |
|
Just got this Tweet: KrisKetzRT @lzigman sen mccaskill at mike shannon birthday party. she will not support another stimulus at this point or an investigate of Cheney.http://twitter.com/KrisKetz(202) 224-6154 FAX (202) 228-6326
|
babylonsister
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-12-09 10:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1. It's early yet. I'll wait to see who might jump on board. I hope |
|
she doesn't have a choice but to change her mind about Cheney.
|
proud2BlibKansan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-12-09 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. This party she was at concerns me |
|
He is a conservative guy here who has a radio show. And he is OBNOXIOUS. He called Oprah a pig and says Obama is a closet Muslim. And Claire goes to his birthday party? Yuck.
|
Gman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-12-09 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Damn, when is McCaskill NOT up for reelection? |
DJ13
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-12-09 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
3. She sure isnt the same fiery woman I watched campaigning for Obama |
|
DC ($$) always seems to get the better of people after they've been there too long.
|
Davis_X_Machina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-12-09 10:11 PM
Response to Original message |
|
...is now the other 99 senators, plain and simple. And she's reflecting the views of her constituents.
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-13-09 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-13-09 01:20 AM by depakid
Just another excuse for selling out.
|
Davis_X_Machina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-13-09 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. Are you telling me that senators... |
|
..aren't motivated primarily by a desire to be well-regarded by the other senators?
Or that that this is a bad thing?
Because I agree with you on the second, but don't see how it's possible to refute the first.
|
depakid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-13-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. I'm asking ya to stop making excuses |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-13-09 05:53 PM by depakid
And maybe to toss out so called "conventional wisdom."
Can you do it?
I'm also saying that you're incorrect- based on facts.
'
|
TheWraith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-12-09 10:18 PM
Response to Original message |
6. You'll forgive me if I don't treat Twitter as a news source. nt |
proud2BlibKansan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-13-09 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. This Tweet is from a reporter |
|
They are the most fun to follow.
|
TheDebbieDee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-12-09 11:22 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Sen McCaskill is my Senator.................. |
|
but I'm very often disturbed when she does her Feinstein/Landrieu impersonations.
Is she or isn't she a DINO?
|
proud2BlibKansan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-13-09 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
I feel your pain.
But hey anytime you want to trade, you can have both Brownback and Roberts if you give me Claire. :)
|
humanahumana
(26 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-13-09 12:48 AM
Response to Original message |
10. i'm sure she won't be the only one... |
|
Edited on Mon Jul-13-09 12:48 AM by humanahumana
it has been my experience that none of the leaders want anything to do with investigating law breaking of the prior admin... i think it has something to do with being part of a privileged & protected class which has been around since the dawn of civilization so i don't hold out much hope but fingers-crossed nonetheless ;)
|
berni_mccoy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-13-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message |
14. I'll believe it when I hear her say it directly to the press, not off of a tweet. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:21 AM
Response to Original message |