Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Sessions Sessions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 01:09 PM
Original message
The Sessions Sessions

Posted by Zandar

Not only are the Republicans walking right into the jet engine on Sotomayor, they're doing it en masse. If today's opening statements are anything to go by, they're lining up to execute themselves.
Sessions, a former prosecutor and attorney general in his home state, challenged the attribute of empathy cited by President Obama in nominating Sotomayor.

"Call it empathy, call it prejudice, call it sympathy -- whatever it is, it is not law," Sessions said.

In particular, Sessions quoted Sotomayor from past speeches in which she said a wise Latina woman should be able to reach a better ruling than a white man, saying it showed an inherent bias.

"I want to be clear: I will not vote for and no senator should vote for an individual nominated by any president who is not fully committed to fairness and impartiality toward every person who appears before them," Sessions said.
So, Jeff is indeed going down the racist asshole route basically accusing the first Latina Supreme Court nominee of being prejudiced against white men. Jeff's buddies on Team Rocket there are follwing his lead.
Arizona GOP Sen. Jon Kyl said that while Sotomayor's "background creates a prima facie case for confirmation," many of her past statements regarding the role of race and gender in judicial decision-making have raised serious questions about her suitability for the high court.
Every person should have emphathy, Kyl also argued, but it is problematic when empathy becomes the key ingredient in reaching decisions.

Kyl also cited a comment once made by Sotomayor that U.S. courts need to take international law into account in certain instances or risk losing influence in the world.

"That's not a judge's concern," Kyl said.
So when Sessions isn't going for the racism, Kyl is accusing her of being an overly emotional woman unable to be impartial. Oh lord, I warned of this train wreck coming for months now, and they're doing it anyway.

Ugly stuff here. There's no way they come out of this looking like anything other than a bunch of hateful old white men.

http://zandarvts.blogspot.com/2009/07/sessions-sessions.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. so basically no change. they always looked like hateful old white men
they are a disgusting crop. The less privileged fat fuck old white men in the Senate we have....the better. They are trying to keep hanging on to a failed America that no longer exists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. If only we were more organized and had the time we could each take
on one of those Senators and read their statements to find words and sentences they used that involved the exact thing they are berating her for.

The questions is this: If the candidate saying this was a male, would they even bother?

Is there an sub-surface intent here to make her into a candidate that feels more than judges? - because she is a woman?

Did they go after O'Conner or Ginsberg in this manner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC