Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On good old Goldman Sachs' coming record profit!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:33 PM
Original message
On good old Goldman Sachs' coming record profit!
Edited on Mon Jul-13-09 06:08 PM by AllentownJake
Well, if news reports are to be believed Goldman Sachs will be reporting at least a $2 billion profit! Reading the articles on the coming profit how did a company that had to beg the tax payers for relief less than 8 months ago turn around so fast.

Goldman was traditionally an investment bank. They provided capital to business ideas and made a profit off of investing in said businesses. Well since we are dealing with the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression this should be great news! Goldman must have made some great investments in businesses and people will be going back to work!

Not really. In reality Goldman's derivative desk made some smart bets. The $2 billion is in reality gambling winnings. Well not really gambling. Goldman has some pretty savvy analyst. More akin to the MIT Black Jack card counting team.

Why does this matter? Well Goldman was given $10 billion from the American people and were asked to use it to fix them self up and do the business they used to do (invest in businesses and make a profit when they succeed). What did they do...well they took the money made some smart bets and paid back the taxpayer with the bets. Wonderful. We financed the re-opening of the casino that got us into this mess!

I'm happy we were paid back...really I am. However the entire point of TARP has been subverted. Shouldn't be a surprise. These guys gambling is what got us into the mess and since no one got their hand slapped well...why stop the gambling. I mean gambling is more fun and easier than actually investing in businesses.

Why is this awful? Well because now that Goldman has a profit these other banks need to make a profit again too! What is a bank to do. Well follow the leader.

Look for our commodities to have all sorts of fun games to be played with by the banksters as more Americans are struggling to find work.

In closing. When you allow criminal sociopathic behavior to go unpunished or at the very least not made more illegal in the future, you can't act surprised when the sociopathic behavior continues. That goes for war crimes or banking.

Special thanks to Timothy Geithner our wonderful Treasury Secretary and Ben Bernake for being enormous failures and dumbasses...or complicit. Either or. They are fucktards.

Oh and extra special thanks to the US congress of the 1990s who decided the New Deal was old fashion and human nature has some how changed in 70 years. Special Fuck you to those guys with the exception of 8 Senators who were Patriots.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Could this have anything to do with it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Seeing they have announced $18 billion dollars worth of bonus payments
Yes I would say that they are cheating is a very strong possibility.

You don't dump $18 billion on your employees if you are investing in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. (cough) did you say $18 BILLION? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I believe I did
Startling, too, is how much of its revenue Goldman is expected to share with its employees. Analysts estimate that the bank will set aside enough money to pay a total of $18 billion in compensation and benefits this year to its 28,000 employees, or more than $600,000 an employee. Top producers stand to earn millions.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/13/business/13goldman.html?_r=2&partner=rss&emc=rss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thanks for answering. I thought it was a typo...milllions not BILLIONS!
Obscene...that's all I can say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yes it is obscene
However, remember our Democratic President took 1,000,000 dollars from Goldman's employees in campaign donations :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I didn't know that either! Well, it's one big ol' quid pro quo! All the Presidents men
have taken good care of those special donors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Second biggest donor after the University of California
Citibank is number six. JP Morgan is number 7

http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/contrib.php?cycle=2008&cid=N00009638

Number 5 industry group supporting his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Holy_Shit. 18 BILLION.

:wow:


thanks for the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Yep and they got a low interest Government loan 8 months ago for half that amount
Edited on Mon Jul-13-09 07:27 PM by AllentownJake
Gotta love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. That last paragraph of yours is the wisest thing that I've read around here
in a long, long time.

Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The sociopathic behavior or the New Deal?
and thank you for reading.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Your observation that human nature hasn't changed much in the 70 years since
the New Deal.

I'm a great fan of your posts in general, btw. Keep 'em coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Thank you
I don't understand why people think we have changed that much in 100 years that the same behavior that caused the first Great Depression won't cause a second :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I doubt that human nature has changed all that much since we started walking upright.
I agree with you. I don't understand why people continually think that the past has nothing to do with today or the future, or that people aren't pretty much the same as they've always been.

Even allegedly smart people, like Larry Summers, fall for that crap.

Then they screw up royally.

Remember back in '99 when everyone said that the business cycle wouldn't happen again and that history had ended? At least Fukuyama (or whatever his name is) recanted. The MBAs, management consultants and main stream economists haven't apologized yet. I'm not holding my breath.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Larry Summers
Edited on Mon Jul-13-09 07:42 PM by AllentownJake
Sigh,

He knew what the hell he was doing. He's from Wall St. Geithner isn't that dumb either. Either is Bernake or Greenspan.

The problem is they sell progressives like Clinton and Obama and turn them into part of the system. Promise them a short gain and re-election.

The MBAs know what they are doing as well. They find ways to justify it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. They also give progressives like Clinton and Obama lots of money.
I think that has helped the sales job.

I also think that Clinton was something of a social climber and as an adult child of an alcoholic, inflicted with the pleaser disease.

Obama may have spent too much time in the U. of Chicago faculty lounge for his own good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. "with the exception of 8 Senators who were Patriots."


could anyone list those Senators? that would be very helpful and educational. i bet Paul Wellstone was one of those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Here you go
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=106&session=1&vote=00354

Dorgan (D-ND), Nay
Boxer (D-CA), Nay
Bryan (D-NV), Nay
Harkin (D-IA), Nay
Feingold (D-WI), Nay
Mikulski (D-MD), Nay
Wellstone (D-MN), Nay
Shelby (R-AL), Nay

McCain (R-AZ), Not Voting


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. TYVM! :) very informative and useful thread. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 09:20 PM
Response to Original message
21. Jake, this is the kind of thread I recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. Someone un-reced it
Which is why I was curious on why? I thought I was pretty spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-13-09 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
22. Spot on. K&R for some better regulation over these 'holes.
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC