Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Don't You Just Give Your Broker a Gun and Tell Him to Shoot You?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 08:57 PM
Original message
Why Don't You Just Give Your Broker a Gun and Tell Him to Shoot You?
from HuffPost:



Dan Solin
Author of the bestseller, The Smartest Investment Book You'll Ever Read
Posted: July 14, 2009 08:18 PM

Why Don't You Just Give Your Broker a Gun and Tell Him to Shoot You?



A reader of my blogs sent me an e-mail with a Customer Agreement from a major brokerage firm. She asked me to look it over and tell her if she should sign it.

The first thing that struck me was this clause:

"Brokerage activities are regulated under different laws and rules than advisory activities and generally do not give rise to the fiduciary duties that an investment adviser has to its clients."

The agreement pointed out that the brokerage firm "...may face certain conflicts of interest and as such, its interests may differ from yours."

These statements are typically inserted in account opening agreements.

I asked the reader this question: Why would you entrust your assets to a firm that tells you it does not have to act in your best interests and further that it may have conflicts of interest with you which it will resolve in its favor?

It gets worse:

The agreement also provided that all disputes must be resolved by mandatory arbitration. Not before an impartial panel, but one appointed by FINRA, which is essentially a trade group for the securities industry.

William Galvin, the highly respected Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts aptly described FINRA's arbitration process in testimony before a congressional sub-committee as "an industry sponsored damage-containment and control program masquerading as a juridical proceeding."

Taken together, these clauses are a sucker punch for the unwary investor. The brokerage firm is telling you straight up that they will not act in your best interest. By consigning you to FINRA's mandatory arbitration, it is unlikely that you will get justice when you try to recover for their misconduct. ...........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-solin/why-dont-you-just-give-yo_b_230578.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-14-09 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thank God I left that industry
If you wrote a disclosure, no matter how confusing or in legalese you were considered warned and you could fuck anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC