Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you feel people who are saving their disposable income are being unpatriotic?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:44 AM
Original message
Poll question: Do you feel people who are saving their disposable income are being unpatriotic?
I've seen more than a couple of posts saying people need to spend their money to help the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. its their money to dispose of as they see fit.
personally my spending habits havent changed to much as im pretty tight when it comes to myself, but i am buying property as and when i can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Savings are critical to having a sound banking system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. No. Saving is necessary for long-term economic stability. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lindisfarne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. If we didn't have an economy based on ridiculous levels of consumption to begin with, the current
level of consumption might be considered "normal" (or possibly "excessive").

Buying & selling is viewed by economists as important because they mainstream economists first and foremost represent the interests of corporations. They don't put anywhere near as much emphasis on effects of their policies on the workers, on society, or on the environment.

There is more than one way to have a healthy economy (and economy can be defined somewhat differently than mainstream economists currently define it) and healthy society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Do you feel Right Wing memes are basis for polls on DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. Heck NO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Versailles Donating Member (384 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm no economist but...
Wouldn't saving be the smartest move at the moment for anyone with a little extra? I mean the only reason my wife and I still have a home after a year of me being unemployed is because she knows how to save money. In an economy as bad as this, who knows if your job will still be there tomorrow and not having a savings to rely on for help is asking for problems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #7
16. Micro, Yes. Macro, No
For the person, it would be best. For the whole, many people with discretionary income saving instead of spending is unhealthy.

However, it's their money and people can spend it or not spend it as they see fit.

GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Bring that assertion over to the economics dept.
don't be surprised if they laugh you out of the building.

Savings is always economically healthy. Not necessarily always good for Goldman Sachs, but for the saver it is very good, and for the economy as a whole it is very good. This, and not by accumulation of debt, is how capital should be formed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. Whatever
When you've gotten three papers published in macroeconomics, let me know.

Savings is not always good for the macroeconomy. There is not one shred of evidence to support that assertion.

Consumption is the driver in any capitalist economy. There is no velocity of money if it's not spent. If there's lesser spending, the production side suffers as the demand falls.

This is simple, really. That you don't see it is on you.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Credit bubble economics
lies in the disreputable tatters it has well earned.

Without savings you can only obtain capital through debt. Accumulate enough debt and you need to borrow to pay interest on the debt, leading to a credit death spiral.

Got any links to these alleged macroeconomics papers of yours?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Not For You
You couldn't possibly understand the mathematics involved.

You're a know-nothing tool. I have no use for you.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. You're a liar
I'm an engineer. I knew more math at the end of my freshman year in college than economists learn over a lifetime.

You are clearly resorting to insult for lack of substance, not as a mere preference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. Some people have disposable income????
Why don't I know these people? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PSzymeczek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. Our income is disposed of
through rent, utilities, and food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostInAnomie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. It is a financial plan that we as a whoole should have undertaken decades ago.
Instead of willingly throwing our cash away on wasteful and unnecessary expenditures, or shoveling it into the troughs of rapacious stock brokers, we should have been ensuring our own financial well-being. We've been far too willing to freely spend or indebt ourselves in the past. It's about time we learned to be responsible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. I think saving is patriotic.
Now, the trouble is finding a safe place to put it. Banks are not trustworthy institutions. I worry about credit unions becoming the next S&L's. Since I still have a mortgage, I am stuck with my bank for now. Plus the interest on savings makes saving a "losing" proposition. However, we need to save for the future. My husband may likely not have a job in the Fall and who knows if there will be any work for the winter? My son is in his last 2 years of high school and we'd like to get him through college without graduating with lots of debt and give him a real start in life.

Purchasing to benefit multinationals who make low quality products in sweatshop conditions in China and other Asian countries-- how does that help our country? It just creates more trash for the landfill and degrades the environment. Your just making money for wealthy investors, not for "our country". Granted, many of our pensions are invested but I have no confidence any of that will be left for my generation.

When the US stops funding multinational crooks like AIG, I might consider being patriotic again and purchase US Savings Bonds. In the meantime, I'll just continue saving to prevent becoming a burden on the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. 43-0 is impressive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
13. No.
.... I think the idiots who were spending money they didn't have were unpatriotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
14. It s more important to keep a roof over your head rather than
shitting what money you do have anyway on worthless crap you do not even need.

Just by going to the store for food, is helping the economy, buying Gas and buying you utility bills..etc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 05:42 AM
Response to Original message
15. My Wife And I Do
So, no.

I don't intend to spend every penny and then have to work until i die.
GAC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
17. What disposable income?!
We had savings until a year of unemployment and me being disabled. With much lower income we are now just paycheck to paycheck, (not like were were making a big income before) and trying to figure out how to do car and house repairs on nothing extra above making the regular bills. We don't buy junk we don't need, but on the other hand we need tools and such for our little farm. We save, buy a piece and pay it off. Only putting a little on credit for things we just have to have. I have not bought jeans in so long I am about to be nekid. I wrote to and told Levis when they left town to move the plant from Greensboro to Mexico that I would not buy from them since they took 300+ jobs out of the local economy, and those were generational jobs done by folks that actually made the products that made Levi Strauss.
Their answer was 'we have to take care of the shareholders, I wrote a stronger note. same to Wranglers who did the same thing the following year.

I have been doing my best to buy local or at least made in USA products.
Since our employer owners seem to want slave labor there is not much we make here anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Great post. Somebody had to say it!
All of it. And pickin up on the Levi's story, they left their original Gold Rush home in San Francisco too!!

How rural are you? Do you avail yourselves of Craigslist, barter, secondhand, etc.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Well yeah, that too.
You screw the public long enough and expertly enough, they have no disposable income, so it matters little what they do with their non-existent disposable income.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
19. They are just being smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. Pissing all your extra money away is very unprofitable.
Why is this even a question that needs to be answered? When did it become the norm for people to screw themselves to help out corporations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-15-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Apparently when Bushco said so. And Reaganomics depended on Conspicuous Consumption to kill
Edited on Wed Jul-15-09 05:57 PM by omega minimo
eventually the economic Goose that laid the Golden Egg.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:41 AM
Response to Original message
29. I think it is inappropriate to feel people regardless of what they
do with their disposable income.

I feel angry, sometimes I feel tired, from time to time I feel hungry - but I avoid feeling people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:52 AM
Response to Original message
30. A few years ago there were all these stories about how Americans don't save enough
Now we are saving
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC