Winterblues
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-15-09 11:16 AM
Original message |
| Does anyone remember what the excuse was that Bush* could not testify without Cheney? |
|
It was during that mockery they called a 9-11 investigation. Bush* was called to testify and he would not do so unless Cheney was with him and their testimony could not be public or transcribed or under oath..Is there any precedent at all for something like that?
|
| Gidney N Cloyd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-15-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message |
| MineralMan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-15-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message |
| Winterblues
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-15-09 12:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. I believe this question is quite embarrassing for Republicans. |
|
It is very difficult to justify such behavior even by the most right wing radical..
|
| ellenfl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-15-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. because he needed cheney's hand up his butt? |
|
Edited on Wed Jul-15-09 12:13 PM by ellenfl
oops! didn't see the prior posts! great minds, and all that. :hippie:
ellen fl
|
| damntexdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-15-09 04:35 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. The same principle by which a dummy cannot perform without a ventriloquist? |
|
No, simpler: the principle by which GOPers are above the law. Yeah, that's it.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Tue Apr 16th 2024, 08:06 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
