Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Health Care bill will not allow new individual private coverage?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ohheckyeah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 11:47 AM
Original message
Health Care bill will not allow new individual private coverage?
If this is true it's going to make it hard to argue the issue with conservatives.

When we first saw the paragraph Tuesday, just after the 1,018-page document was released, we thought we surely must be misreading it. So we sought help from the House Ways and Means Committee.

It turns out we were right: The provision would indeed outlaw individual private coverage. Under the Orwellian header of "Protecting The Choice To Keep Current Coverage," the "Limitation On New Enrollment" section of the bill clearly states:

"Except as provided in this paragraph, the individual health insurance issuer offering such coverage does not enroll any individual in such coverage if the first effective date of coverage is on or after the first day" of the year the legislation becomes law.

So we can all keep our coverage, just as promised — with, of course, exceptions: Those who currently have private individual coverage won't be able to change it. Nor will those who leave a company to work for themselves be free to buy individual plans from private carriers.

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=332548165656854
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
galileoreloaded Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Tsk Tsk. Troublemaker..Why do you hate America?.....
}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. So does that force individuals into the exchange?
If so, big deal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cbdo2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. The "exchange" is too expensive for some of us.
Isn't that the point of this whole thing is making health care more affordable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Who is "us"?
Explain your situation and why the exchange is too expensive. Im just curious, thats all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It is cheaper to be part of a pooled-risk than an individual policy holder.
The larger the pool of insured clients, the lower the cost to everyone. Groups have greater negotiating power than individuals. If you have ever paid COBRA premiums, you have some idea about what it costs to have an individual health plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Which is down right stupid to start with
Why? Well, because every client the insurance company has is part of their overall risk pool. Every premium payer and potential liability is part of their system. Their ability to divide this into virtual sub-groups with select rates is just another method of offering discounts to attract business at the cost of the little guy. Smaller groups merely pay more to attract large groups. This isn't part of risk model analysis. Its part of advertising and business attainment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Toad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Not necessarily.
Young, healthy individuals pay far less for insurance than individuals buying into pooled risk plans. When offered COBRA, they generally decline because they are eligible for individual coverage at half or less the cost of COBRA.
Older individuals, or individuals with conditions that are deemed costly, pay far more for insurance than individuals buying into pooled risk plans.

In order to make the pooled risk plans affordable, those young healthy individuals will have to pay more to balance out the money that is no longer being collected from older individuals, or individuals with conditions that are deemed costly.

Remember - pooled risk makes everyone pay an average amount (perhaps weighted slightly for age) - that means those who could have been paying less than average will be paying more as part of a pooled risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohheckyeah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. I don't know and frankly
I don't care except if this provision is used to keep the Health Care Reform bill from passing. Then I care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. Investor's Business Daily doesn't like the plan.... there's a shock (NOT).
Investors will no longer be able to make obscene profits off of crappy health insurance policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohheckyeah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I don't know a thing about
Investor's Business Daily except to assume that it is conservative.

The question remains. The argument against health care reform has been that it takes away choice. The counter-argument, at least for me has been, no it doesn't. Now it looks like it does.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohheckyeah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. The question is
how do you argue that Health Care Reform won't take away choice if in fact it does?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tucsonlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Okay, Listen Verrry Closely.....
In countries with single-payer universal health care, patients can visit ANY physician and ANY hospital they choose. I'm guessing that under that private insurance plan you love so much they gave you a list of "approved" health care providers that you were required to pick from.

Insurance Companies are unnecessary middlemen, in business to make a profit - NOT to provide health care.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC