Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In Venezuela, Land Redistribution Program Backfires

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 05:25 PM
Original message
In Venezuela, Land Redistribution Program Backfires
In Venezuela, President Hugo Chavez's government has made the expropriation of farmland — taking land from big landholders and giving it to the poor — central to his so-called revolution. The idea is to spur production and end dependence on food imports.

But the results have fallen short, making the country more dependent on foreign food than ever before.

Consider farmer Ramon Barrera, who spends his days feeding a handful of scrawny pigs.

He thought he also would be raising crops after arriving a few months ago in Las Vegas, a town in a sun-baked corner of northwestern Venezuela.

The land had been a vast cattle ranch before the government seized it to redistribute to poor farmers like Barrera.

But Barrera says there is no irrigation, no technical help from the government and no credit.

<snip>

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=106620230
<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. When it comes to Venuzuela...
I basically don't trust ANY American reporting, NPR included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And some don't trust the reporting from there either
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. There's a REASON that small farms have all but died off in this country.
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 05:30 PM by MercutioATC
Big farms can perform the same function more efficiently and economically.

It may be an unpleasant truth, but it's still the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Chavez would have done better to threaten nationalization than to actually do it
Several leaders in the Middle East faced similar dilemmas in the wake of their revolutions. They nationalized their oil and threw the western oil companies out but then didn't have the infrastructure to actually drill and refine the oil. The better solution would've been to negotiate with the oil companies to get terms more favorable to the national interests with the threat of nationalization employed as a weapon to make the oil companies concede.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rusty charly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. Jamaica did the same things with the hotels.
Nationalized them and forgot about the teensy, weensy issue of marketing and travel agencies and sold all the hotels back, now to different chains. So, down there you hear: This USED to be a Radisson, but now it's a Hilton, etc., etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. You can put one dude with a hoe on an acre for 12 hours a day
or you can put one dude with a tractor on 100 acres for 12 hours a day.

Which guy is going to feed more people?

Which guy is going to have the wealth to feed and educate his kids?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. Not if you take into account the true cost of industrial ag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Which is why collective farming is the proper socialist method to replace land barons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #22
31. You can have all of the collectives you want, if you don't have the technology it won't be efficient
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. The entire point of a collective is that they have the land and money between all of them to...
get the technology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. I almost think we should almost always identify original sources when talking Venezuela or Chavez
There are some serious Anti-Chavez disinformation machines out there

There are some serious Pro-Chavez disinformation machines out there

Chavez started out right, but lately has done some very anti-democratic things - which call into question any of its organs.

Then again, the US has done some very anti-democratic things - and IT'S organs need to be called into question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. This hit piece is not new...I saw it at least a month ago.
The man has been on the farm for two months and the problems are not solved...just like Obama has been in office 6 months and the problems are not solved.
But before it was a large cattle ranch owned by a rich person that probably sold the cattle to McDonald's for cash....that produces 0 food for the people of that country....so how is that better?
Colonialism has done that all over the world...exploited the resources of the land for the benefit of the wealthy. And there excuse is that they can make the land productive...for themselves and the natives can just go fuck themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Yep, we already did this, complete with links to new contracts
for tech development and provision that this individual say isn't available. I'll pass this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. See my post #8. I found one of the threads. n/t
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 06:01 PM by Cerridwen
eta: oops, I was post #8.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Thanks. We can't have enough concern here about Venezuela, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. I new I remembered that post....thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. it's dated July 15th.
the bottom line is that Venezuela is importing much more of its food than it did a few years ago. I actually approve of the idea of the plan- in theory, but the reality is that implementing such a plan is fraught with difficulties. And btw, this is a program that has been ongoing for years- not a mere few months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:01 PM
Original message
WaHo 6/20:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
32. But could that be because the people are eating more
Now that more of them have jobs or land to farm and that poverty is down? I mean one of the first thing people do that are in poverty is buy more food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Here's one of the threads from last time.
Guess what? It's talking about the same poor guy.

Guess what again, cali? You were in that thread, too.

Didn't these look a little similar to you?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=405x16422#16444

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. Well done!
It certainly is an informative thread. It is interesting the article used in the link you provided is written by the same reporter in this OP. I appreciated the work done by the posters in the link you provided to educate as to the REAL facts. Here is one good example of that, imo:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=405&topic_id=16422&mesg_id=16445
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. On many levels, it seems.
The link you posted was the reply in that thread to none other than the OP of this thread.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. NPR
still has agents from the CIA working for them and with them.

not surprising from what the CIA does, but I guess you know that from your tea services working 9 hour days in the country at your restaurant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Thats cool, when they collapse ADM can sell them the split
it is obvious when you place people with no agriculture background on arable land what happens. We have plenty of surplus to sell them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. People can be educated and trained which they are doing
Which the article doesn't go into.


you have been trained too.

But we know who trained you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Sesame Street?
the count was very informative. They can use their petro income to pay for the lack of production that will result of chavez securing power by redistribution of stuff that he does not own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. And why do the people that live there not own the land
and it's resources?
Have you ever thought about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conspirator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. delete
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 06:02 PM by conspirator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Why? Just watch their imports.. Time will tell the truth
no politics, just lost capacity. Hey i am sure an american farmer will take that petro dollar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. Time is telling the truth. 22 quarters of growth, reduction in poverty
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 06:47 PM by EFerrari
per the UN, and now the inflation rate is going down some finally.

The thing is, there are plenty of valid criticisms to be made of the Venezuelan government. They aren't doing enough about violent crime. They aren't diversifying fast enough, although that's harder now in this global economy. Chavez and his party need to put more leaders more out front and center, although again, if they did, who knows if we'd ever hear about it.

But these shallow hit pieces are just the same thing over and over again. They make easily debunked accusations and their sole purpose it to dirty up Chavez's image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadesOfGrey Donating Member (646 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. You win EFarrari! Tellin it like it is :-) Luv Ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
38. +1
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pavulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
39. Yep, time will tell.
NPR is evil, chavez is jesus. I'll will wait this out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
20. Gee, give land to people who don't understand the science and business of modern farming...
...and that is inevitable result. Here in the US 150 yeas ago we created countless numbers of local agricultural colleges for farmers to teach them the science and business of farming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. You must have missed the whole part where this article is bs. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShadesOfGrey Donating Member (646 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
26. I'm gunna unrec this because of bias...

Hugo has it right. The land and resources of a county belong to ALL citizens not just the upper few (and the foreign interests) that can afford to buy them. There is bound to be pluses and minuses when tranfering control from corporations to individual farmers. I don't buy this article as a whole. There might be a few hickups along the way but letting the people of Venezuela take over what corporations use to control is admirable and just. Viva La Chavez!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
29. Give it some time. If took several years for the land redistribution in Zimbabwe to take effect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. How can you possibly even compare the two?
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 07:16 PM by EFerrari
They couldn't be more different.

Good grief.

The Venezuelan government was swimming in corruption when Chavez was elected in a more transparent election than Obama had. It's still corrupt as hell and zero of that corruption is attached to Chavez or his cabinet or even to elected members of his party nationwide.

After ten years, doesn't that tell you something?

That government is trying a lot of new things. Some of them will be awful big failures. That happens.

But the government isn't hiking wealth up to the top, they aren't holding political prisoners, they're engaging their region vigorously with respect to trade and development. They've pushed minority rights -- women, indigenous, GLBT, disabled -- in the Assembly for the first time, they kicked out the DEA so they could do real drug interdiction and last month handed over #5 on the list of world drug traffickers. I give them a lot of credit for what they've taken on.

If you don't like Chavez because he can seem bombastic, that's fine. But trashing his government on balance is sort of irrational. It's one of the very best Venezuela has ever had and it's contributed to development all over Latin America.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. Best in terms of the peoples welfare
But not best for busness...and that is the problem, and the reason why he takes a lot of heat.
At some point we will have to face the fact that people should come first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. I don't know that I take that as an article of faith.
Edited on Thu Jul-16-09 07:44 PM by EFerrari
It's bad for the old way of doing business, at any cost to the people, yes. Very bad for that model and that's why Chavez is today a big fat demon in the corporate media.

But what we're doing here isn't working even more spectacularly. How many retail outlets that we all know have disappeared just in the last six months?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-17-09 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. It is not working here because the model depends on consumption
And constant growth.
And it should be obvious that we cannot continue constant growth when we have finite resources. And that is the dilemma we are in, how do we restructure our economy to a more realistic and sustainable model.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superduperfarleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-16-09 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
36. Fair and balanced as always, cali. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC