Tony_FLADEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-17-09 03:59 PM
Original message |
How about a 2% tax on outpatient health care services |
|
Would it be a good idea to have a 2% tax on outpatient health care services to fund health care reform? You could argue that this tax could bring down the cost of health care because this would be an incentive to avoid the tax. Thus, any effects of the tax could be negated through reduced costs.
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-17-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message |
1. um, that would hit poor and working classes hardest |
|
and they are the ones needing help the most.
Back to the drawing board.
Tax the rich.
|
Tony_FLADEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-17-09 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. If the poor and working class received health insurance and affordable |
|
prices then it would be worth it.
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-17-09 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Go back and brush up on your math |
|
The gap between rich and poor is growing. The middle class is shrinking. The rich need to pay more taxes. Period.
|
ColbertWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-17-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The best way to cut healthcare costs is to get rid of the middle-man: insurance syndicates. n/t |
marybourg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-17-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
3. No. Then all care would become "inpatient". nt. |
Oregone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-17-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message |
4. How about taxing everyone, based on income and dependents? |
|
Seems to have worked in the past.
|
Thothmes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-17-09 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. Probably the only sane way to fund a national |
|
health program, but unlikley. To many Dems fear the tax and spend moniker that gets tagged on them every election. JMO
|
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-17-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message |
5. How 'bout a high excise tax on vanity plastic surgery? |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-17-09 04:02 PM by havocmom
And raise other taxes back up to a reasonable level on the top INCOMES not just wage earners.
|
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-17-09 04:04 PM
Response to Original message |
6. How about bringing back the pre-Reagan tax code? nt |
havocmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-17-09 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. America was doing better in the 60s |
Thothmes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-17-09 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. Of course taxes were high |
|
We had things to do. Thousands of miles of concrete freeway to be laid down before the end of the decade as part of the interstate highway program. Get a man on the moon before the end of the decade. President Kennedy decreed that we would do that. NASA had an open checkbook to make it happen. And my favorite 1960s project was President Johnsons launching of a major land war in Vietnam. This project also had an open checkbook to ensure victory over those dirty reds. Of course there were some other less grandiose projects, medicare comes to mind. Needed the tax dollars to spend for these.
|
ColbertWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-17-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. That's a great idea. n/t |
H2O Man
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-17-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
But I'd favor a 4% tax on any proposals that hurt the poor.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:40 AM
Response to Original message |