Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Roman Catholic Diocese Appeals To Supreme Court To Keep 12,000+ Pages Of Sex Abuse Docs Under Wraps

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 02:44 PM
Original message
Roman Catholic Diocese Appeals To Supreme Court To Keep 12,000+ Pages Of Sex Abuse Docs Under Wraps

Conn. diocese seeks appeal to US Supreme Court

By JOHN CHRISTOFFERSEN
Associated Press Writer
Fri Jul 17, 4:20 pm ET



NEW HAVEN, Conn. – A Roman Catholic diocese in Connecticut sought Friday to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court to keep under wraps sex abuse documents that could shed light on how a prominent retired cardinal handled the allegations.

Bridgeport Diocese officials asked the state Supreme Court to continue a stay on releasing the documents while it asks the nation's highest court to review the case.

The state court has ruled that more than 12,000 pages of documents from more than 20 lawsuits against priests should be released. Those documents have been sealed from public view since the diocese settled the cases in 2001.

The records could reveal details on how retired New York Cardinal Edward Egan handled the allegations when he was Bridgeport bishop from 1988 to 2000. Egan's deposition should be in the file, according to an attorney for the newspapers seeking the documents.

In Boston, Cardinal Bernard Law resigned after church records were released detailing his role in handling sexual abuse claims.

The Bridgeport Diocese faced a Monday deadline to appeal before the records were disclosed.

more...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090717/ap_on_re_us/us_church_abuse;_ylt=ArcRcqupmWEZ4srDMoLBR.iyFz4D;_ylu=X3oDMTJsMnVzcGVyBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkwNzE3L3VzX2NodXJjaF9hYnVzZQRwb3MDMTEEc2VjA3luX2FydGljbGVfc3VtbWFyeV9saXN0BHNsawNjb25uZGlvY2VzZXM-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. The facts are coming out of the woodwork
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. They are running scared now, and they damn well ought to be.
They are just another gang of thugs.

markO8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
get the red out Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. I am sure they would want their parishioners to be honest
But for them, not necessary. Truth, the whole truth, why is that too much to ask of these people? I am tired of their special privileges that other people who have covered up crimes do not get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. And, what would one like
to bet that the facists on the SC would love to grant their request?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. I expect Scalia, Thomas, and Alito to recuse themselves
That's what I would expect in a just world. In the real world, one of them will be writing the majority opinion. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You forgot Roberts.
I imagine they'll all follow the ethics precedent Scalia and Thomas established in Bush v. Gore.

Precedent: ZERO ethics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. If they change their name to the CIA or Bush Administration,
the Obama administration might go to bat for them in court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solstice Donating Member (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. They're in luck, the Catholic Church runs the Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. These dirty bastards are just no damn good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. The only just way to treat this is to ask what the decision would be if
the organization were say Exxon or Yale or Cleveland School District. Ultimately, if managers covered up crimes, they and the company are liable. I'm still waiting for the first bishop to be charged with aiding and abetting. I am a catholic myself, and I notice that the Bishops have no problem calling the cops when theft is the crime involved:

Ex-pastor admits theft of $213,000 from parish

http://www.buffalonews.com/home/story/735942.html

Fr. Francis Guinan was found guilty Feb. 23 of stealing from St. Vincent Ferrer Catholic Church in Delray Beach, Fla., in a trial that highlighted faulty bookkeeping and lax standards and oversight.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_10_45/ai_n31558589/

Cases around country show theft-abuse link
Alleged victims say they often received lavish gifts from priests

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/197481_priestcases30.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Full disclosure
Release the records - expose these criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC