Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Costly Bank Failure Friday

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 04:22 PM
Original message
A Costly Bank Failure Friday
Edited on Sat Jul-18-09 04:22 PM by Political Heretic
http://www.propublica.org/ion/bailout/item/a-costly-bank-failure-friday-718#11615

Four banks failed on Friday, soaking the FDIC’s deposit fund for more than $1 billion. The biggest losses came from Southern California, as regulators finally ended what had become a slow-motion sink beneath the waves for two banks. The total number of bank failures for the year now stands at 57.

Analysts recognized Vineyard National Bank’s troubles as early as January 2008, when its parent holding company announced losses of $41.3 million for the previous quarter. By July of that year, the California-based bank had signed a consent decree with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency requiring it to stop gorging on brokered deposits and to raise capital from more other sources. Instead, its capital shrunk while its non-performing loans grew. This past April, the Nasdaq and the New York Stock Exchange delisted Vineyard National Bancorp <1>, the holding company. Speculation <2> then centered not on whether the bank would fail but why it hadn’t already. Regulators finally pulled the plug <3> on Friday evening entering into an agreement with California Bank & Trust of San Diego to take on Vineyard’s deposits. The FDIC estimates the total cost to its insurance fund at $579 million.

Temecula Valley Bank followed a similar path. It reported in January that in the last quarter of 2008 its non-performing assets has grown nearly fivefold to $148 million. On February 12, it signed a Cease and Desist Order with the FDIC requiring it to raise more capital. Then a deal <4> with a private equity group to inject $210 million into the bank’s holding company fell apart. After the bank missed numerous deadlines, regulators on Friday brokered their own deal <5> with First-Citizens Bank and Trust Company of Raleigh, North Carolina to take on the bank’s deposits. Total cost to the FDIC—$304 million.

The two other banks to fail yesterday were in South Dakota and Georgia. BankFirst of Sioux Falls was the first bank to fail in South Dakota since 1992. The FDIC entered into an agreement <6> with Alerus Financial of Grand Forks, North Dakota to assume the deposits. In Georgia, banks have been falling like ripe peaches. The FDIC shuttered <7> First Piedmont Bank of Winder, making it the tenth Georgia bank to fail this year. First American Bank and Trust Company of Athens, Georgia will assume the deposits.


Steal Our Stories
http://www.propublica.org/about/steal-our-stories/

You can republish our articles and graphics for free, so long as you credit us, link to us, and don’t edit our material or sell it separately.

We’re licensed under Creative Commons, which provides the legal details. (The license says “no commercial use.” We’re fine with ads appearing on the same page as republished stories, but you can’t resell the stories or sell ads specifically targeted to them.)

If you have questions, contact our general manager, Richard Tofel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-19-09 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. It's sorta too bad that no one cares about this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC