Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-18-09 05:25 PM
Original message |
A minor suggestion to slightly improve the rec/unrec system. |
|
Edited on Sat Jul-18-09 05:26 PM by Occam Bandage
Make it so that you can unrec a thread you have previously recced, and vice-versa. I've three times so far accidentally given threads the wrong input due to my own imprecise clicking. I would like DU to provide a means of protecting my opinions from my own incompetence at delivering them. Thank you.
|
Warren Stupidity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-18-09 05:29 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I was so close to unrecing yet another stupid wreck-unwreck OP |
|
and then I actually read what you had to say and agree completely. It is too easy to accidentally unrec a post you meant to rec and vice versa.
|
johnaries
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-18-09 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
5. LOL! Me too! K&R. (I hope....) |
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-18-09 05:30 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I've recommended reinstating the "are you sure" confirmation from day 1.... |
|
Edited on Sat Jul-18-09 05:31 PM by BlooInBloo
Sigh - if only the world ran according to BlooInBloo....
:rofl:
|
uppityperson
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-18-09 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. I agree with as have missed before |
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-18-09 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. Standard UI design: Either make a change undo-able, or require explicit confirmation. |
kentuck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-18-09 05:31 PM
Response to Original message |
3. It might slow down those trigger fingers a little... |
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-18-09 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
8. It's not a matter of thought, entirely. |
|
Edited on Sat Jul-18-09 05:36 PM by Occam Bandage
I just have a very twitchy trackpad. I have an older laptop that's been through a lot of abuse. It's natural to mouseover and click. Sometimes the cursor jumps a little bit, sometimes I anticipate it jumping, and sure, sometimes it is a matter of thought in that I saw the wordshape "recommend" and clicked it before checking to make sure it wasn't "unrecommend."
I mean, yeah, it would be a solution for me to deliberate upon each link I wish to click, but that would require work on my end. After all, a definition of web usability would be "a large amount of work on the administrator's end to protect incompetent users from having to perform a small amount of work."
|
billyoc
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-18-09 05:32 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I accidentally voted for Pat Buchanan. |
Boojatta
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-18-09 05:38 PM
Response to Original message |
9. The positive rating this thread has received is just a symptom of the problem. |
|
Obviously people intended to unrecommend it, but they accidentally recommended it.
|
IDemo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-18-09 05:42 PM
Response to Original message |
10. You would need two recs/unrecs to overcome your misclick |
|
Once to undo your misclick, and once to rec/unrec a thread the way you meant to. They would need to add a variable "click_count", or something similar, to the DU code to keep you within the 3 clicks required to rec and then correct a mis-rec. Plus, they'd probably want to make it a toggle of your previous rec, so you can't, for instance, add 3 recs to a thread.
|
Robb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-18-09 05:42 PM
Response to Original message |
11. This ... is a good idea. |
|
I can however imagine indecisiveness giving way to spending all day on a single thread. :D
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-18-09 05:42 PM
Response to Original message |
12. How about the warning page, like before? |
|
Are you sure you want to recommend this thread?
|
Occam Bandage
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-18-09 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. That would also be sufficient. nt |
Buzz Clik
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-18-09 06:04 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:19 AM
Response to Original message |