Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't think we can have meaningful health care reform until we rid ourselves of lobbyist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 02:16 PM
Original message
I don't think we can have meaningful health care reform until we rid ourselves of lobbyist
special interests. Over and over again big pharma, hospital and physician lobbyist groups destroy efforts of reformists to fix the health care system. We need to go back to square ONE, which is eliminating ability of special interests to destroy reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, never, then. Lobbyists are specifically protected by the Constitution.
Sorry about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Then maybe we need a constitutional amendment.
And, yes, it is that important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. A constitutional amendment? In THIS country?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. If things get bad enough, which I believe they will be if Obama can't enact health care reform,
YES, it will be a definite possibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. It will definitely never be a possibility. 2/3 majority in both houses and 3/5 of the states.
A "sky is blue" amendment wouldn't get 10 feet. It just can't happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Funny. And true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Lobbyists may be protected
But if we could achieve a true publicly financed election system they would be neutered.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. But you have to get around them, and all the legislators who are beholden to them,
to succeed. Catch 22.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Ah, there's the rub. They wouldn't be neutered, but YOUR lobbyists would have just as much clout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. They would be neutered
If they couldnt use campaign donations to secure votes they wouldnt have any pull.

Our current pay to play system has become legalized bribery, but if you remove the money from campaigning it opens up the possibility the lobbyists could be charged with attempted bribery when their only way to influence votes is to buy the politicians "gifts" or provide them with other amenities like expensive trips.

The fear of getting caught trying to bribe politicians would effectively neuter them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. We're mixing campaign financing and lobbying here. An easy trap to fall into,
since both involve bribery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Its not a trap, its the real state of our political system today
The DOJ should investigate every single PAC on Capitol Hill for RICO violations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
23. Amen. Anti-trust violations, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. ^THIS
If they couldnt use campaign donations to secure votes they wouldnt have any pull.

Agreed, lobbying in its current form is legalized bribery. Taking away the money and the 'gifts' would go a long way toward leveling the playing field, as would public campaign financing.

Good luck taking away the goodies, though. Most reps are shamelessly enamored of the current system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Towlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. No, lobbyists are not protected by the Constitution.
That assertion is based on the First Amendment provision for "the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances", however, lobbyists who represent corporations and other special interest groups are not "the people" and shouldn't be treated as such.

The ideal solution, in my opinion, is to force corporations and special interest groups to petition the people, through advertising or editorials, in an attempt to get their support. If they succeed then they can encourage those people to write their Congressional representatives. Lobbyists should not be allowed to bypass the people and have direct and private access to Congress. We should know about everything they're trying to do to influence our lawmakers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. It wouldn't be such a problem if the 'right to petition' didn't allow money to do the talking. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. Here in America, Inc., corporations certainly ARE the people, the USSC made that settled law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malletgirl02 Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Will Never happen
So no health care reform for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. Or maybe it'll be the other way 'round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
18. Not a fan of the first amendment, eh?
Nah, I think we can have both the 1st amendment, and health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Towlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. The 1st Amendment does NOT grant a right to corporations to petition for a redress of grievances.
It reserves that right for The People.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Sure it does.
Corporations are owned by people. Those people have a right to hire other people to petition their government in regards to the businesses that they own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. Well if we don't get real heathcare reform....
we can just vote out the bastards who voted against it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. Kick back to the top, Big Pharma Lobbyists own two thirds of the Beltway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. I obviously agree
and don't understand why anyone HERE would not. :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
26. We'll never have a meaningful anything till we get rid of the lobbyists
but that doesn't mean we don't fight for what we can get.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC