Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Collins announces intent to vote to support Judge Sonia Sotomayor

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 11:32 AM
Original message
Senator Collins announces intent to vote to support Judge Sonia Sotomayor
U.S. Senator Susan Collins today issued the following statement announcing that she will vote to support the nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to serve as the 111th justice of the United States Supreme Court.

"I have decided to vote in favor of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to serve as Associate Justice of the Supreme Court. The decision of whether to confirm a nominee to the Supreme Court is a solemn responsibility of the Senate and one that I approach with the utmost care.

"In considering judicial nominees, I carefully consider their qualifications, competency, personal integrity, and judicial temperament. Judge Sotomayor has impressive legal experience, has excelled throughout her life, and is a tremendously accomplished person. Indeed, the American Bar Association Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary-after an exhaustive review of her professional qualifications, including more than 500 interviews and analyses of her opinions, speeches, and other writings-unanimously rated her "well-qualified." And based on my review of her record, my assessment of her character, and my analysis of her adherence to precedent, Judge Sotomayor warrants confirmation to the high court.

"I know that I will not agree with every decision Justice Sotomayor reaches on the Court, just as I disagree with some of her previous decisions. However, upon reading these decisions, talking personally with her, and hearing her responses to probing questions, I have concluded that Judge Sotomayor understands the proper rule of a judge and is committed to applying the law impartially without bias or favoritism.

"My expectation is that Justice Sotomayor will adhere to Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's admonition that "a wise old woman and a wise old man would eventually reach the same conclusion in a case." Based on her responses to the Judiciary Committee, she will avoid the temptation to usurp the legislative authority of the Congress and the executive authority of the President. As Chief Justice John Marshall famously wrote in Marbury v. Madison, the Court must "say what the law is." That, after all, is the appropriate role for the federal judiciary. For a judge to do more would undermine the Constitutional foundations of the separate branches.

"I will vote to confirm Judge Sotomayor as I believe she will serve our country honorably and well on the Supreme Court."

http://collins.senate.gov/public/continue.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=9dac572f-802a-23ad-4600-c8011ed21708&Region_id=&Issue_id=&CFID=8323538&CFTOKEN=34260116
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Susan Collins makes me sick
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Well she is right once in a while
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Right to vote for Sotomayor, REALLY wrong in her dipsh*t explanation...
...invoking that mental midget Sandra Day O'Connor, and then espousing sexist and racist talking points about how a latina would have to watch and see that her beliefs don't influence her ruling...no, let's not ask those pompous white males those questions, because being a pompous white male you don't have to have to worry about your beliefs prejudicing your views because your beliefs are always right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Good point though I disagree with your characterization of O'Connor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Actually, Thomas is the mental midget...OConnor was medicore...
her vote in Bush v Gore shows she was just some republican hack, not a legal scholar by any means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. One of the seventeen Republicans that will do so.
:shrug: It has been worked out among them to have 23 no votes and 17 yes votes..Must appease the base and yet not completely turn off the Latino vote..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. That's four now, helping in case Kennedy and Byrd can't vote. At least no filibuster.
Specter said he would vote for her too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yep, they may as well give up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. she should tell this to her undistinguished colleagues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC