Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Change you can believe in: F-22 Funding Defeated

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:10 PM
Original message
Change you can believe in: F-22 Funding Defeated
Another promise kept.

Thank you Senate, and thank you Mr. President and Secretary Gates:


The Senate voted Tuesday to cut off production funding for the F-22 fighter, a come-from-behind win for Defense Secretary Robert Gates who has targeted the costly program as part of his effort to restructure the Pentagon budget.


The 58-40 roll call was more decisive than many had predicted and represented a dramatic shift from only last week when conventional wisdom held that $1.75 billion authorization would easily survive a challenge on the floor. The win gives new life to Gates’s budget initiatives and is a much needed boost for President Barack Obama at a time when public polls show declining support for his larger change agenda, including healthcare reform.


Mindful of the stakes, the administration mounted a late-breaking lobbying campaign to avert what would have been an embarrassing loss for the White House.


Gates himself was the most public point man for the administration, making calls to senators and delivering a toughly worded speech last week in Chicago. But behind the scenes, Obama and his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel also jumped in on the phones, and Vice President Joe Biden called senators last week — including his old friend, Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii), an ardent F-22 backer.
.
.
.



http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/25210.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent news.\nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. seeing as we supposedly 'won' the cold war awhile back....
it's ABOUT TIME that we stop paying to fight it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Very good news. I just wish we hadn't bought the first 187 either
Maybe 50-100, but for the most part None of our potential enemies can even match the near ancient F-15. Refit, don't rebuild. Why fuck with success?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Big step in the right direction,
or left direction, depending on how you define directions ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Don't pop the cork yet...
The House bill still has the funding in it. It is open until resolved in committee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. Excellent! One down, about 1,000 more boondoggles to go. n/t
:kick: & R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpartanDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Here's how they voted
YEAs ---58
Alexander (R-TN)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bennet (D-CO)
Bond (R-MO)
Brown (D-OH)
Burris (D-IL)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Conrad (D-ND)
Corker (R-TN)
DeMint (R-SC)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Feingold (D-WI)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Graham (R-SC)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagan (D-NC)
Harkin (D-IA)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaufman (D-DE)
Kerry (D-MA)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Kohl (D-WI)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Lugar (R-IN)
McCain (R-AZ)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shelby (R-AL)
Specter (D-PA)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Udall (D-CO)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (D-VA)
Webb (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)

NAYs ---40
Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Begich (D-AK)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
Dodd (D-CT)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Grassley (R-IA)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Inouye (D-HI)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Martinez (R-FL)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murray (D-WA)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Snowe (R-ME)
Tester (D-MT)
Thune (R-SD)
Udall (D-NM)
Vitter (R-LA)
Wicker (R-MS)

Not Voting - 2
Kennedy (D-MA)
Mikulski (D-MD)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bankhead_ATL Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Shelby (R-AL) voted Yea??????
eeek
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Fools! I have them now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sfwriter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. From Wikipedia:
While attempting its first overseas deployment to the Kadena Air Base in Okinawa, Japan, on 11 February 2007, a group of six Raptors flying from Hickam AFB, Hawaii experienced multiple computer crashes coincident with their crossing of the 180th meridian of longitude (the International Date Line). The computer failures included at least navigation (completely lost) and communication. The fighters were able to return to Hawaii by following their tankers in good weather. The error was fixed within 48 hours and the F-22s continued their journey to Kadena.<100>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. I'm glad to hear that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmike27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yea
It seems like a chink in the DOD/Pentagon budget's armor.

Sad, isn't it? Almost everyone that mattered, that was in the know, didn't want them. Yet, we had trouble removing them from the budget. Doesn't that just point to the problem with the whole monsterous MIC, and how it eats our health care, how it consumes our education, how it explodes our chances of repairing our roads, brudges, infrastructure, and future green power grid.

It is an all-consuming beast. It consumes not just things here at home we need, but so many lives all over the world. It consumes our media. It consumes our attention. The damage is horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. WTF? From other thread: "The Senate's vote does not necessarily kill the program"
See babylonsister's thread, quote is in body of report
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. The House gets to vote on it too.
If the two versions are different, they go into reconciliation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Then the celebrations seem premature. Let's not take our eyes off the House ball folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. "declining support for his larger change agenda, including healthcare reform"
huh?

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Everything in the media should be taken with a huge grain of salt.
With outlets like Politico, two huge grains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-21-09 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
18. I was surprised about the mix of senators
This really looks fairly bipartisan.

Keeping Gates was a really smart move. It looks like Obama chose someone he could really work with. Gates has not struck me as particularly ideological and seems to dislike all the waste that takes place in these Pentagon contracts. And it looks like him and Obama want to really focus on a military that is ready for the threats and conflicts we really face (and those aren't aerial dogfights). I think some of the conservative repukes that wouldn't have trusted a Dem president might at least be listening to a Bush holdover.

The F-22 is a "cool" piece of hardware as far as technology goes but 187 should be more than enough. I'm glad they scrapped it before it got even more out of hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC