Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Nichols: Senate Rejects F-22 Boondoggle

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 05:37 AM
Original message
John Nichols: Senate Rejects F-22 Boondoggle
from The Nation:




Senate Rejects F-22 Boondoggle
posted by John Nichols on 07/21/2009 @ 3:01pm


After years of rubberstamping even the most ridiculously expensive and unnecessary allocations to enrich defense contractors -- and in so doing extend the reach of the military-industrial complex about which former President Dwight D. Eisenhower warned -- the US Senate on Tuesday actually rejected a useless military spending scheme.

As part of the broader debate over the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010, the Senate voted by a 58-40 margin in favor of Michigan Democrat Carl Levin's proposal to strike $1.75 billion in funding for more F-22 fighter jets.

Designed in response to the fantasy that the US Air Force would be fighting high-tech dogfights with Soviet fighter jets, the F-22 has never been flown in combat or deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan.

But, until now, Congress had continued to allocate cash -- in multi-billion-dollar increments -- to Lockheed Martin, the defense contractor that, using comic-book and video-game marketing, dubs the jet fighters "Raptors." .............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat/454196/senate_rejects_f_22_boondoggle




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC