Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Quick, what's the world's largest flightless bird? ..........

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 08:55 AM
Original message
Quick, what's the world's largest flightless bird? ..........
......The Boeing 787 !!!!



Boeing 787 may not fly this year
The structural flaw that delayed the first flight of the 787 Dreamliner is more complex than originally described by the company, and the plane's inaugural takeoff is likely at least four to six months away, say two engineers with knowledge of Boeing's problem.

By Dominic Gates
Seattle Times aerospace reporter


The structural flaw that delayed the first flight of the 787 Dreamliner is more complex than originally described by the company, and the plane's inaugural takeoff is likely at least four to six months away, say two engineers with knowledge of Boeing's problem.

"It's got to take at least three to four months just to get something installed on an airplane," said a structures engineer who has been briefed on the issue. "It's definitely a costly fix to go and do this work."

A second engineer, who is familiar with the details of Boeing's construction method, said the fix must first be made on the nonflying test airplane in the Everett factory. Assuming that's successful, it will take another month or two to install the fix on the first airplane to fly.

Both engineers said the issue requires a thorough redesign of the plane's wing-to-body join, and the necessary parts will be very difficult to install on the test airplanes that have already been built. ..........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/boeingaerospace/2009513152_boeing22.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes I would think that having the wings fall off would make it less of a Dream to fly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good
Shows they are taking the issues seriously and best to work them out now then wait until crashes and lawsuits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
exman Donating Member (116 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Lawsuits are not an issue...
:crazy: to the passengers, they would be dead. I do agree however that fixing the problem before a crash happens is a pretty good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
3. Big Bird
At least I'm pretty sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe they should eliminate this feature:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. And BOEING was LAUGHING at AIRBUS


....when the A-380 had a delay in its first flight.......KARMA BUDDY...KARMA....it has a way of slapping you when you least expect it and want it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
7. Republican ChickenHawk of course
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. Let's just go back to building these things out of aluminum. If it uses a bit more fuel, ok
just so long as it gets you there in one piece.

The reason that the Airbus 300 series tails and rudders have been snapping off is because they're composite, and composite tails don't bend, they break, at least in that design.

This tells me that the new Boeing has some similar issues. Great. Just great. Anything to save a few bucks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC