Poor House or Child labor

[wilt the stilt]

which would conservatives rather see?

[atreides1]

1. Both

Along with their Democratic Blue Dog allies.

[Donnachaidh]

2. they'd like BOTH.

Can you imagine, sending those *greeedy bastards* who took on *gasp* HOME LOANS, and then lost their jobs -- to the poor house, to be sure THEY get punished for the sub-prime mortgage scandal? What a GREAT smokescreen for the unwashed - they can even do reality shows on the *poor house* and call it something like Lock Up.... :sarcasm:

And all those little kids who no longer have homes with those locked up parents can go live in group homes attached to a factory. THEY can work off Daddy's debt, making crappy running shoes that are sold to the yuppies who are wearing their shoes out *snapping up real estate bargains*.

What a SERVICE this would be considered by the RW nutbags! Got the deadbeats in jail, got the kids chained to sewing machines working off their parents debt - so you don't have to worry about the little ankle-biters running the streets! And if you feed them less and work them longer hours, they will be too tired to get pregnant. :sarcasm:

Win/Win for the Randian Rightwingers...

[wilt the stilt]

3. hunger is motivation n/t

[EC]

4. Both

They are still angry about the repel of these and other labor and laws that lock up the poor and allow them to be used as slave labor...