Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Liz Cheney Promotes MORE Canadian HealthSCARE Lies On Larry King.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 10:01 AM
Original message
Liz Cheney Promotes MORE Canadian HealthSCARE Lies On Larry King.
They have nothing left in their bag of tricks so they switch gears and go into HealthSCARE lies overdrive. Listen to Liz Cheney continue promoting the same republican scare talking point lies about the Canadian health care system. Canadian friends I know continue to laugh at such ridiculous claims being made daily by these industry SCARE mongers and keep asking me WHY hasn't the Democratic party called them out on their lies? Why aren't health care proponents dispelling such lies using testimonials of REAL Canadians & health care providers who use the health care system everyday?


Excerpt from Larry King transcript:

<http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0907/21/lkl.01.html>



KING: Would you say the thought, Liz, of -- of reform is unanimous -- everyone wants some reform?

CHENEY: Yes. I think it's clear that...

KING: OK.

CHENEY: ...that, you know, there are some things that need to be done to fix the system. However, I think that there's absolutely no justification -- and you see the American people now growing increasingly concerned about the president's plans, the Democrats on the Hill, the plans that would really turn our system into a Canadian...

KING: OK...

CHENEY: ...or a British system...

KING: Let me...

CHENEY: ...where you don't get to decide who your doctor is and where the government is deciding who gets what treatments. That's simply...

KING: Let me get a break...

CHENEY: ...a dangerous path to go down.



-----------



KING: One other thing.

CHENEY: But let's go back...

KING: One other thing.

CHENEY: ...to the fact that Britain...

KING: The issue...

CHENEY: ...and in Canada...

KING: What -- Liz.

CHENEY: ...people don't get to choose their medicine.

KING: All right. We're...

CHENEY: They don't get to choose their doctors.

KING: We're getting repetitive, guys.


----------------------------

video:

<http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200907220007>



---------------------------------------------



10 MYTHS ABOUT CANADIAN HEALTH CARE BUSTED!!

Physicians for a National Health Program:

<http://www.pnhp.org/news/2008/february/10_myths_about_canad.php>



4. You have to wait forever to get a family doctor.

False for the vast majority of Canadians, but True for a few. Again, it all depends on where you live. I live in suburban Vancouver, and there are any number of first-rate GPs in my neighborhood who are taking new patients. If you don’t have a working relationship with one, but need to see a doctor now, there are 24-hour urgent care clinics in most neighborhoods that will usually get you in and out on the minor stuff in under an hour.

It is, absolutely, harder to get to a doctor if you live out in a small town, or up in the territories. But that’s just as true in the U.S. — and in America, the government won’t cover the airfare for rural folk to come down to the city for needed treatment, which all the provincial plans do.



5. You don’t get to choose your own doctor.

Scurrilously False. Somebody, somewhere, is getting paid a lot of money to make this kind of stuff up. The cons love to scare the kids with stories about the government picking your doctor for you, and you don’t get a choice. Be afraid! Be very afraid!

For the record: Canadians pick their own doctors, just like Americans do. And not only that: since it all pays the same, poor Canadians have exactly the same access to the country’s top specialists that rich ones do.


----------------------


Debunking Canadian Health Care Myths

A must read!

As a Canadian living in the United States for the past 17 years, I am frequently asked by Americans and Canadians alike to declare one health care system as the better one.

Often I'll avoid answering, regardless of the questioner's nationality. To choose one or the other system usually translates into a heated discussion of each one's merits, pitfalls, and an intense recitation of commonly cited statistical comparisons of the two systems.

Because if the only way we compared the two systems was with statistics, there is a clear victor. It is becoming increasingly more difficult to dispute the fact that Canada spends less money on health care to get better outcomes.

Yet, the debate rages on. Indeed, it has reached a fever pitch since President Barack Obama took office, with Americans either dreading or hoping for the dawn of a single-payer health care system. Opponents of such a system cite Canada as the best example of what not to do, while proponents laud that very same Canadian system as the answer to all of America's health care problems. Frankly, both sides often get things wrong when trotting out Canada to further their respective arguments.

As America comes to grips with the reality that changes are desperately needed within its health care infrastructure, it might prove useful to first debunk some myths about the Canadian system.


Myth: Canada's government decides who gets health care and when they get it.

While HMOs and other private medical insurers in the U.S. do indeed make such decisions, the only people in Canada to do so are physicians. In Canada, the government has absolutely no say in who gets care or how they get it. Medical decisions are left entirely up to doctors, as they should be.

There are no requirements for pre-authorization whatsoever. If your family doctor says you need an MRI, you get one. In the U.S., if an insurance administrator says you are not getting an MRI, you don't get one no matter what your doctor thinks — unless, of course, you have the money to cover the cost.

http://www.denverpost.com/opinion/ci_12523427]
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Democrats permitted the GOP to take over and Monopolize
the Debate on Health Care.

From the beginning they should have known they needed a war
room with members of Congress continuously refuting the
GOP arguments.

The Canadian Debate should have been nipped in the bud.

Actually they are expanding on the Health Care System
we have. More people will simply be able to buy Health
Insurance.

This makes me wonder--did Dems on Hill really want Health Care.
Or did they like the Republicans simply want to cut back on
Medicare and Medicaid because "Entitlement Spending" is
too much????

If you believe in something you fight passionately and use
every tool available to get your side of the argument out.

They will look very lame saying Republicans stopped something
they did not even fight for.

If the Blue Dogs position was to win, then we should not
have even started Health Care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That puts a whole new definition spin on the term ' representative '. Question is WHOSE interests
are they really representing, the insurance companies or the People's interests?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does anyone but the extreme right wing of the Rethug party care what she thinks
on anything? WTF does she know about health care anyway? She worked in the State dept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Unfortunately, its become very evident that these industry shills are repeating the same
outright healthSCARE lies to the public in order to fog the truth. This has been a staple part of their overall strategy. Liz Cheney sounds just like her father who effectively sold us the image of a ' mushroom cloud ' in order to drum up fear based public support for making a case to march to war with Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kind of Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Cheny's leaps stated as facts are disgusting.
I don't believe anything coming out of that nasty mouth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. If she wasn't lying, she would have nothing to promote.
It's in her genes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. I have a choice of doctors and have in fact changed doctors a few times
...mostly 'cause I moved to a different part of the city and it was more convenient to go to the local clinic.

I don't even know how the government would go about chosing my doctor. There's absolutely no bureurocracy in place to do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bleacher Creature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why is she on tv at all? Who out there values her opinion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. She might be getting her feet wet and primed for a run for office. Move over Jeb.
But instead of playing the role of political surrogate for the Republican Party, Cheney might soon be taking her policy prescriptions to the body politic for ballot approval. In the same Washington Times interview, Cheney indicated that she'd be open to running for elected office. "It's something I may very well do," she said.

<http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jul/13/liz-cheney-open-political-run/>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC