Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Strange! Humans Glow in Visible Light

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kadie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 02:01 PM
Original message
Strange! Humans Glow in Visible Light
Strange! Humans Glow in Visible Light

Charles Q. Choi
Special to LiveScience
LiveScience.com charles Q. Choi
special To Livescience
livescience.com – Wed Jul 22, 10:32 am ET

The human body literally glows, emitting a visible light in extremely small quantities at levels that rise and fall with the day, scientists now reveal.

Past research has shown that the body emits visible light, 1,000 times less intense than the levels to which our naked eyes are sensitive. In fact, virtually all living creatures emit very weak light, which is thought to be a byproduct of biochemical reactions involving free radicals.

(This visible light differs from the infrared radiation - an invisible form of light - that comes from body heat.)

To learn more about this faint visible light, scientists in Japan employed extraordinarily sensitive cameras capable of detecting single photons. Five healthy male volunteers in their 20s were placed bare-chested in front of the cameras in complete darkness in light-tight rooms for 20 minutes every three hours from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m. for three days.

The researchers found the body glow rose and fell over the day, with its lowest point at 10 a.m. and its peak at 4 p.m., dropping gradually after that. These findings suggest there is light emission linked to our body clocks, most likely due to how our metabolic rhythms fluctuate over the course of the day.

more...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20090722/sc_livescience/strangehumansglowinvisiblelight







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NOW tense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Soul Shine n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dude! Have you ever really looked at your hands?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. Auras
So are these the auras that some psychics claim to "see"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Same thing I was wondering. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. What if there are internal states that dramatically increase the effect?
Edited on Wed Jul-22-09 02:48 PM by napoleon_in_rags
Kinda makes you wonder....


edit: notice the majority of photons coming from the head in the OP pictures...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Why did you say "see"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 07:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
27. Vague expression
The expression "to see" has variable definitions based upon the context. Not everyone claims to sense the auras with their eyes necessarily, or at least with out some sort of aid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seldona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. Unless their eyes are 1000 times more sensitive than the typical human,
it is unlikely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #25
28. Alternately sensitive
I'd guess it would be more a case of being sensitive to levels and wavelengths that the rest of us have no sensitivity at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. Even a sensitivity that can vary at times in the individual and/or be developed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Uh, natural consequence of blackbody radiation, anyone?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
26. Doesn't look like it
because the emission varies considerably, and the minute variation in skin temperature wouldn't be able to have that much effect. It says "this is not infrared radiation from body heat", and I think the scientists would have thought of the short wavelength tail of any blackbody radiation - and so would the editors and reviewers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. (shrug) I missed what's strange about this...
Edited on Wed Jul-22-09 02:06 PM by BlooInBloo
We emit infrared light. It's not surprising that we would also emit light of other frequencies, at other intensities.

That's what spectrum analyzers are for.


EDIT: Here's what WOULD be surprising: if people emitted light at ONLY one EXACT frequency, and at no others. That would be very strange.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenfrequed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
29. Uhm...
The article was stating that we emit absolutely minute quantities of visible light, NOT infared radiation. Emit or generate amounts of light which is not the same as reflecting light.

Now as to an explanation it is probably related a chemical interraction produced by body heat. Free radicals or some kind of rogue oxydization seems likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Whew.. I thought Boehner might have bought the Krylon Fluorescent spray tan, by mistake
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. wha-
:spray: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catbyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. WOW!
That looks just like me when I get a hot flash!! :rofl:

Diane

Anishnabe and Proud

FREE LEONARD PELTIER
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. We've known this for a long time. It was even shown in the movie 'Predator.'
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Except for Cheney.....
Who emits a dark evil aura that sucks in light like a vacuum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Kirlian photography
The underlying physics (which makes xerographic copying possible) was explored as early as 1777 by Georg Christoph Lichtenberg (see Lichtenberg figures). Later workers in the field included Nikola Tesla; various other individuals explored the effect in the later 19th and early 20th centuries.




achieved with kirlian photography

interesting post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-22-09 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. George Bush previously conducted these experiments - when he set his farts on fire
at frat parties. He emitted lots of light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
optimal-tomato Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
16. This is awesome...
...but what's with all the posts trying to connect this to psychic/religious nonsense? It's a thousand times dimmer than a human can see. Damn! Stop trying to twist legitimate science into something it isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norrin Radd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Lighten up.
Ahahahahahahh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Humans can see it. The measurements are miniscule. Doesn't mean the light is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. :rofl:
:rofl: So that's the ticket! I have wondered how skeptics will deal when science finally catches up with what mystics have always known. You showed me! :rofl:

Psst: We live in a quantum universe too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
17. Chernobyl not included.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sirveri Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. Actually Chernobyl would be included.
All humans have trace ammounts of radioactive material in their body, all of it emits energy on varying spectrums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Nothing ruins a joke like a science geek.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
omega minimo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #22
30. We are electromagnetic beings. How do some scientists overlook this?
Edited on Thu Jul-23-09 12:08 PM by omega minimo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Papa Boule Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 03:16 AM
Response to Original message
21. Luminous beings are we, not this crude matter. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wroberts189 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
23. very interesting nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC