Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Carbon debt of ethanol

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 09:59 AM
Original message
Carbon debt of ethanol
Science 29 February 2008:
Vol. 319. no. 5867, pp. 1238 - 1240
DOI: 10.1126/science.1151861


Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change
Timothy Searchinger,1* Ralph Heimlich,2 R. A. Houghton,3 Fengxia Dong,4 Amani Elobeid,4 Jacinto Fabiosa,4 Simla Tokgoz,4 Dermot Hayes,4 Tun-Hsiang Yu4

Most prior studies have found that substituting biofuels for gasoline will reduce greenhouse gases because biofuels sequester carbon through the growth of the feedstock. These analyses have failed to count the carbon emissions that occur as farmers worldwide respond to higher prices and convert forest and grassland to new cropland to replace the grain (or cropland) diverted to biofuels. By using a worldwide agricultural model to estimate emissions from land-use change, we found that corn-based ethanol, instead of producing a 20% savings, nearly doubles greenhouse emissions over 30 years and increases greenhouse gases for 167 years. Biofuels from switchgrass, if grown on U.S. corn lands, increase emissions by 50%. This result raises concerns about large biofuel mandates and highlights the value of using waste products.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. ethanol is a joke for everyone except those growing corn and making the magic green car juice.
Of course the ethanol lobby is insanely powerful so don't except that to change.

One example. As bad as ethanol is ethanol from corn is the worst possible method to make it. Sugar is about twice as efficient.
It is legal to import raw sugar w/o excess taxes for consumption. If you import it for making ethanol (at about half the cost of corn ethanol) it is subject to a 145% import tariff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lefthandedlefty Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Ethanol might be bad but
I love used vegtable and used motor oil in my diesels they seem to like it also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCoxwain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ethanol has low energy density ( fewer K joules per unit) .. and the worst part is that it is


Hygroscopic and will mix with water in any ratio .... you can imagine the consequences


Ethanol is a bad idea

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC