Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush & Aides "Suspected Libby Went To Jail To Cover-Up For Cheney"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 11:05 AM
Original message
Bush & Aides "Suspected Libby Went To Jail To Cover-Up For Cheney"
Edited on Thu Jul-23-09 11:06 AM by kpete
A former Bush aide even tells the magazine that deep down, the president himself probably suspected Libby went to jail to cover-up for Cheney.



From the Time article:
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1912297-1,00.html

And there was a darker possibility. As a former Bush senior aide explains, “I’m sure the President and (chief of staff) Josh (Bolten) and Fred had a concern that somewhere, deep in there, there was a cover-up.” It had been an article of faith among Cheney’s critics that the Vice President wanted a pardon for Libby because Libby had taken the fall for him in the Fitzgerald probe. In his grand-jury testimony reviewed by TIME, Libby denied three times that Cheney had directed him to leak Plame’s CIA identity in mid-2003. Though his recollection of other events in the same time frame was lucid and detailed, on at least 20 occasions, Libby could not recall details of his talks with Cheney about Plame’s place of employment or questions the Vice President raised privately about Wilson’s credibility. Some Bush officials wondered whether Libby was covering up for Cheney’s involvement in the leak of Plame’s identity.

That meant taking up the pardon question again was, as a West Wing veteran put it later, like passing a kidney stone — for the second time. Bolten declined to take a stand, according to several associates. Instead, he lateraled the issue to Fielding, claiming that a legal, not a political, call was required. If the counsel’s office decided a pardon wasn’t merited, says an official involved in the discussions, everyone else would have cover with Cheney. “They could say, Our hands are tied — our lawyers said the guy was guilty.”



The magazine also reports that “In private, (former President Bush) was bothered by Libby’s lack of repentance.”

more:
http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/07/23/report-some-bush-officials/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. k*r Bush foiled Libby's perfect plan
If LIbby were pardoned, he would have been 99.999% off limits for further prosecution and Cheney would be home free without a worry the Plame leak or anyting else. As it is now, there's an opening that might ensnare him in a prosecution, although it's not likely. That leaves Cheney exposed if they really want him.

Bush crew members don't do well after a full rebellion like this. Who does Cheney think he is? A Bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. why isn't libby singing?
recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kick (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC