tuvor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-23-09 05:18 PM
Original message |
Suggestion for the Rec/Unrec feature: Bring back the confirmation dialog box. |
|
I just recommended something I meant to unrecommend. :banghead:
I like this new feature, but back when all we could do was to recommend, a confirmation dialog box would pop up asking if we were sure we wanted to recommend the post. Had this detail remained with the new Rec/Unrec feature, I wouldn't have gone and given credence to something I thought deserved just the opposite.
Am I the only one who's messed up like this?
|
Mythsaje
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-23-09 05:20 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I can say I've never had that happen to me... |
|
If I push "rec" it means I meant to push "rec." Particularly since I've never used the Unrec and really don't see a point that I would. Thus, not a problem for me. I LIKE the lack of confirmation.
:D
|
CrispyQ
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-23-09 05:22 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Personally, I like that there are fewer clicks to rec a thread, |
|
but I appreciate your issue. My problem is putting people on my buddy list when all I want to do is view their profile. ;)
|
FSogol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-23-09 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. You mean we aren't really buddies? |
jgraz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-23-09 05:25 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Or, just let us undo recs/unrecs |
|
No need for these things to be written in stone. As long as the 24-hour period hasn't expired, what's the problem with switching a rec?
|
tuvor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-23-09 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. I like that idea even better. n/t |
nosmokes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-23-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Nooo! I hated that confirm box. If ya hit the wrong button then hit the other |
|
one to cancel yourself out. sheesh.
|
tuvor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-23-09 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Um, you can't "cancel yourself out". |
|
You seemed 100% certain where I was only 99% certain, so I followed your advice.
So I ended up unreccing another post I would normally have rec'ed; You made me make Dan Rather cry!
|
nosmokes
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-23-09 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. oops.sorry bout that. mebbe you can only rate a post once,eh? |
|
I'm not a fan of the unrec anyhoo, but it ain't worth arguing over.:hi:
|
tuvor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-24-09 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. Dan Rather crying "ain't worth agruing over"?!?!?! |
|
Priorities, man, priorities!
;)
|
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-23-09 06:46 PM
Response to Original message |
8. This has been suggested since day 1 of unrec, and I agree - standard UI design... |
|
Edited on Thu Jul-23-09 06:47 PM by BlooInBloo
Either give people an undo function OR put a speedbump in the way of un-undoable actions.
EDIT: The speedbump makes more sense than undo, in this instance.
|
TexasObserver
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jul-23-09 08:18 PM
Response to Original message |
10. We need to triple the time involved because you screw up occasionally? |
|
For all of those of you who think that adding that speed bump will stop you from screwing up the most simple action ever conceived here, I suggest you simply pay more attention and not complain when you make a mistake that has almost zero consequences, anyway.
|
tuvor
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-24-09 02:12 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
12. I might agree...if it weren't all about me. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:25 PM
Response to Original message |