Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone Noticing Media Turning on Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
liberalmike27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 01:10 AM
Original message
Anyone Noticing Media Turning on Obama
I don't know if the rest of you have noticed, but it seems in the last couple of weeks, the media has been turning on the negativity toward Obama's policy. I don't really think they've ever heaped a whole lot of praise on most of his ideas, though they are always quite complimentary of his family life, and that sort of things.

It seems to me that it started taking place, just about when the House of Representative suggested putting a surtax on over half million, and over a million a year. Personally, I don't know why they stopped at a million, perhaps another category for over ten million, and another for over a hundred, and maybe we should be thinking about throwing capital gains in with ordinary income, as most normal Americans CD interest is included.

Is that a coincidence? I don't think so. Katie makes 15 million a year, Rush got 400 million until 2016 and a 25 million dollar signing bonus. O'Reilly gets about ten million a year, and David Gregory made about 3 million before he got the up to MTP, and his wife is wealthy too, working for Fannie May. Add to that a few snarky questions like "President Obama, do you really think the rich should have to pay for everyone's health care," by Meridith Vierra. I've heard numerous comments about "soaking the rich," which is ridiculous, as to be soaked, it'd have to be closer to 90 percent. Adding a few percent to such wealthy people is getting a little wet, but certainly they aren't drowning. It is a very unflattering way to express it, when in fact, most of us are and have been, soaked by so many decisions and choices wealth has made in this country.

The media, and wealth, and corporations control everything, they choose who gets in office, and they pretty much seem to pay our elected politicians, and then the pols do what they want. And it seems they've been shipping jobs away for years, demonizing unions, and lowering our pay in any, and every way they can.

But that was the time, that was just about when I noticed the worm turning, and them being more openly negative toward Obama. I halfway wish he'd just decide to not run again, and toss a few FDR words at the "economic royalists," the "fat-cats," and "money-changers in the temple." That'd do us all good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. The media stands to lose a major source of advertising revenue
if the public option, and especially single payer, were to take hold. And with all due respect to Schutlz, Maddow, and Olbermann, their parent company cashes in on U.S. warfare.

:headbang:
rocktivity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmike27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. All True
but it seemed to start happening at just about the time when the House suggested the tax on the rich.

Yea, not talking about the Pentagon, and the incredible waste is pretty much a media agreement. It's like the communism filter. There will be no talk of any sort of communism. They don't touch the CIA generally, especially in the past. In fact, no one talked about Iran's 1953 coup, which started all of this recent stuff, no one seemed even aware of it in the media, UNTIL Obama mentioned it in his trip over there.

Yet, it was the culminating event, unless you count the discovery of oil, and then them nationalizaing their own oil.

That's why I don't see any of the media as liberal, it's right-of-center, to fascist pretty much. Thank God for the Internet, but I'm sure they'll fuck that up too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Real Healthcare Reform should also eliminate TV Drug Ads
Edited on Fri Jul-24-09 01:43 AM by Moochy
ask your doctor about ethics!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 03:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. My God yes. Is it a medical treatment or not??? "Ask your doctor about hip replacement!"
Your DOCTOR will TELL you if hip replacement is right for you. IF your need to ask your doctor about it, then what he was thinking of before isn't the best treatment and therefore he is a BAD doctor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. I agree with you. I've admittedly become more
complacent since the election, but the change in the tone of the news coverage has me on alert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 01:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Seemed to me it started while Obama was concerned with G8, and that failed stimulus
Edited on Fri Jul-24-09 01:28 AM by MarjorieG
media cycle began, and how he can't be trusted on economy and health care. Lawrence O'Donnell just said both Dems and GOP know Obama health care in trouble, same cmtes in House and Senate from '93, so I wonder if it isn't just an added glee of taking him down where they want him because they sense a weakness and they can. In fact, as former Chief of Staff to Finance Cmte, O'Donnell has been voice of doom on heath care, generally.

I hope Obama can salvage what he thought was his plan and campaigned on, a strong public option. Already not a Medicare single-payer, I'm sure he thought there could be consensus, but Dems especially gave him trouble about everything, not just cost. None wanted to take risks, or make strong policy.

Obama knows he and the country needs this, but I hope he can retool not what sells, but something that can work. Congress has not had his back, or the American needs, on this.

We need an education on what our tax rate used to be when we were responsible, and what other countries pay, because our country is clueless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 01:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Something you hear as a kid...
about big business being in control. But what's wrong with bringing this out into the open to talk about or the same with racism? The news wants to talk about this stuff then why not take advantage of this and talk?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmike27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think what is wrong to them
Is that the media is one of the biggest businesses around. I believe that is why they don't pin the money on the politician. Health care companies aren't the only ones paying big sums for law. All the media companies have done, and did the same during Bush's years. Exposing Senators, and plastering the numbers over their faces like Mike Moore did, will only make them throw arrows back at the media, as they too have their lobbyists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabasco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
32. The media is a small branch of the mega war-profiteering and Treasury-raiding corporations
Edited on Fri Jul-24-09 12:41 PM by tabasco
They don't care about profits, they care about catapulting propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorax7844 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. kick this thread rules
can you still edit to change your title? The part about taxing the rich should be in the title, it really hits the nail on the head.

They do not want to talk about this, not at all, cause they know America is fine with taxing their rich asses.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmike27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. We see how the media reacted
When Obama actually spoke honestly about the officers arresting Gates in his own house, we see how the media treated him. Imagine if he spoke openly about it generally speaking, more often.

He's walked a very fine line, because the white people that were running his campaign knew how it would influence white folks if he spoke out about race. Certainly that core group of birthers, tax tea partiers, fox viewers, and old Klan members aren't going to change their minds. Most liberals are over race enough. But there are still quite a few in the middle that have been convinced by decades of perp-walking black-only people on the local news, who will be swayed by honest, and open discussion of things like racism.

I'm still hearing this debated, as absurd as it is these officers made the decision to arrest a guy, who they had to realize at some point was in his own house.

Sad as it is, there is a group of crossover voters are are entirly too comfortable with profiling crackheads, that have been developed. They seem happy with Obama as long as he's preaching about raising kids, like Cosby. But when he talks about the reverse side, the resentment and regular practices against blacks in society, we've seen how that plays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. I never felt they were on his side in any real way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PretzelWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. he isn't as "radical" and unstable as Bush or McCain for business
but now that he's trying to go a little too far according to what the big business overlords want....well, it's time to make him pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 01:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. That assumes the media was ever on his side.
At best, they treated him as a shiny bauble to be used to make ratings.

Now that some of his policies and agenda threaten their cash cows (pharmco & insurance company advertising...) they're not even pretending to be nice to him.

This will be like the whole Rev. Wright thing - tape-loops of "God damn America" over and over and over and over...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Time to take away their cash cows
Edited on Fri Jul-24-09 02:21 AM by depakid
Get the disease mongering drug ads off the air.

Or imply a threat to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. YES!
Edited on Fri Jul-24-09 02:05 AM by Mimosa
It started 2 months ago but has gotten BAD lately.

LiberalMike I K&Red. Your OP is brief and right on target as to their motives. What can we do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmike27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Being Aware of it
And spreading it around to friends that the media being liberal is a lie, is about all we can do. Perhaps not watching them, but even I find it hard to do that. I yell at the television a lot.

The hoodwink comes when they pretend to be liberal by supporting social issues, which corporations could give a crap about. But on economic issues, like pay, anti-pollution, keeping the media from consolodating, or raising taxes on the rich, or talking about Pentagon spending negatively, well, this stuff doesn't get through their filters.

Economically, MSNBC is center-right, and FOX is pretty much Fascist, or perhaps another F-word is appropo, Fantasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
13. They are cooking it up a notdh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
16. Please stop calling it the "media". It is nothing less than the propaganda arm
Edited on Fri Jul-24-09 03:57 AM by HCE SuiGeneris
of its corporate masters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Corporate Marketeers and Advertisers posing as 'journalists'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric68601 Donating Member (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
17. Honestly, it's gotten to the point that..
I classify all the crap I hear about Obama under 2 categories

COMPLAINTS
&
CONSPIRACY'S

It makes me wonder what we will see more of during his term. I mean, damn can anybody name them all?

Bowing to a king, touching the queen, mustard on the burger, the peace sign shirt by his kid. That's just a couple off the top of my head.

Then you have the Conspiracy's. Muslim, Kenyan, wants to destroy insurance companies, and on and on.

Someone should really consider creating a forum devoted to Obama complaint's and conspiracy's.

I mean, damn, it gets so old, that when I'm on any given forum with a right wing retard, it's not even worth trying to rebut, just gotta chime in and say... OK, what's the complaint/conspiracy that's gonna get him impeached this week. Sometimes I think their so damn wrapped up in calling the guy Messiah, that their starting to believe their own horse shit and expect the guy to perform a fukking miracle with the economy and health care.

And the "LIBERAL MEDIA" really has been coming down on the guy as of late.... what'sup with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmike27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. Yea
It's interesting how even the most center-right of the media, MSNBC, seem only able to "react" to things. They never seem to venture out into their own unchartered territory, and react instead of proacting.

What effect does it have when Chris Mathews brings on people and talk about it? A whole lot of people will see it that won't even have seen it on FAUX news. It pushes it, puts it in the ether.

I know some attention has to be given to righting the BS that we allow on the networks that proport to be the news. But I think sometimes that it gives them unwarranted attention. Most folks that listen to MSNBC don't even watch FAKE newscorp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. "turning" ... it turned when Obama became the Dem frontrunner over Hillary ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmike27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. Not sure what you mean
But clearly Hillary would have been no different, and getting the same negative treatment had she managed to win.

I might add, she'd have been hedging and carefully walking that line of what you can and can't say in the media too, just like Obama. There are powerful forces that shove politicians around, and money is just one of them.

I doubt there is a day in Obama's life, where he doesn't wake up and wonder if it is his last. We've seen history, and how the right are completely willing to have people killed to thwart real change.

Still, I'd love for Obama to take this one term, say what he wants, and take his chances on the next. Part of the problem with first-termers is they are far too concerned with becoming eight-year presidents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
19. Millions of dollars of health care insurance corporate, lobby and PR money
If health insurers would just honor their policies, cover everyone (stop exclusions d/t pre-existing conditions) and stop trying to screw people over, they could save a lot of money on lobbyists.

and...
I think the government should have a surtax on all corporations that obtain free technology and research data knowledge from universities and colleges that receive federal and state dollars (including subsidized student loans). Maybe then universities will get out of the property development business and back into the education business. Perhaps we might get savvier citizens.

and...
there should be a narrow definition on what is considered "news" vs. opinion/entertainment. Much like magazines must label some multi-page articles "Advertisement Supplement".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jester Messiah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
20. The media is like a pendulum
If ever you see them building up a person or thing, you can lay money that it's only to knock them back down again on the back swing. The media needs to generate discontent in order to fill the 24/7 news cycle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmike27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. More like a paddle ball
The paddle is the middle, and before it ever gets completely back onto the liberal side, it is hit by the paddle, and the ball of opinion is sent, once again, into right-wing la-la land.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
21. No, but I've been noticing a lot of hand-wringing trolls on DU of late
:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yes, but the media is a door that swings both ways...
...he can get them back...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
28. Taking a page from the same M$M playbook used w/Clinton
American politics is much like 'pro' wrestling: canned controversy, and pre-determined outcomes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
29. I Just Had Said That On Ed Shultz
Show -

Group think media - we will never get health care because, Obama didn't behave or say the things the media "wanted" him to.

60% of his Tweeters said Pres. did a good job - 100% media panned his performance.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
31. Yes
Corporate owned and they're getting the word from their bosses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC