Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fairness in Cocaine Sentencing Act of 2009 (H.R. 3245), (Fairness in Racial Profiling reduction)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-25-09 10:49 AM
Original message
Fairness in Cocaine Sentencing Act of 2009 (H.R. 3245), (Fairness in Racial Profiling reduction)
Wednesday marked a historic moment: the House of Representatives did a markup of the long-awaited Fairness in Cocaine Sentencing Act of 2009 (H.R. 3245), sponsored by Rep. Robert Scott (D-Va.). The ACLU has been pushing for this moment for the past 22 years. Why is this bill so significant?

Ever since the passage of the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, there has been a huge disparity between the sentencing for crack cocaine and powder cocaine (different forms of the same drug). All it takes is for a person to have five grams of crack cocaine (little more than a packet of sugar) and they’re guaranteed a minimum sentence of five years. But if a person has powder cocaine instead, things will look much, much brighter: it takes possession of 500 grams of powder cocaine to give a person the same exact five-year sentence. That’s a ratio of 100-to-1 — a huge disparity that has fallen disproportionately on African-Americans. These are the kinds of laws that have caused the ranks of the incarcerated to swell to nearly 2.5 million, or one in every 100 adult Americans (PDF).

In the scheme of things, this may seem like an irrelevant point. What does it matter? People just shouldn’t do cocaine, period. Or, crack addicts should simply use powder cocaine, right? Wrong. Crack arrestees are overwhelmingly black. More than 80 percent of the people prosecuted for crack possession are African-American, despite the fact that the majority of crack users are either white or Hispanic.

Although the original intent of the legislation was to simply "crack down" on crack cocaine use, it had the inadvertent effect of discriminating against African-Americans. Countless numbers of people like Kemba Smith have been given ridiculous, excessive prison sentences (24 1/2 years, in Smith’s case) for their first nonviolent offences.

However, we may finally be at the end of this dark tunnel: with the passage of the Fairness in Cocaine Sentencing Act of 2009, the disparity may finally be coming to an end. We commend Rep. Scott and his cosponsors for creating this long overdue bill and voting to finally eliminate the disparity. This is a very encouraging first step in reforming cocaine sentencing, and we are very excited to finally see it after 22 years. Take action and join us in urging Congress to pass this important crack cocaine bill. It’s now up to Congress to keep the momentum going.

http://blog.aclu.org/2009/07/24/finally-cracking-the-disparity-its-about-time/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-25-09 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. So they are going to reduce to crack sentence?
I guess thats baby steps. I'd still like to see all drug sentences eliminated. Instead of a jail sentence for 'hard' drugs get some kind of rehab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-25-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Here and here
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-h3245/text

ELIMINATION OF INCREASED PENALTIES FOR COCAINE OFFENSES WHERE THE COCAINE INVOLVED IS COCAINE BASE.
(a) Controlled Substances Act- The following provisions of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) are repealed:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



(1) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(A).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



(2) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(B).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



(3) The sentence beginning ‘Notwithstanding the preceding sentence’ in section 404(a).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



(b) Controlled Substances Import and Export Act- The following provisions of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 951 et seq.) are repealed:CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



(1) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(1).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink



(2) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(2).CommentsClose CommentsPermalink


http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode21/usc_sec_21_00000801----000-.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-25-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. long overdue
glad it is finally happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-25-09 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good
That was a blatant piece of racism from the '80's and never should have been allowed to stand. It's beyond disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC