Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can there be a greater irony than George Will opining that President Obama is "overexposed"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 09:55 AM
Original message
Can there be a greater irony than George Will opining that President Obama is "overexposed"?
Edited on Sun Jul-26-09 10:02 AM by Phoebe Loosinhouse
On Stephanopoulis Round Table portion of his show just now. He further stated that great showman Ronald Reagan (let us bow our heads in silent contemplation) knew that you had to leave the audience wanting more. He said someday soon the "novelty" of Obama would wear off and people would reach for their remotes to change the channel when they saw him! The irony was so thick, I think I need chelation therapy.

Ariana Huffington said something very interesting about Saul Alinsky's theory of political activism resulted in the 5th stage "reconciliation" and she said she thought Obama was trying to move too quickly to reconciliation before some of the earlier stages had been fully moved through. I don't know enough about Alinsky (except that he is a name that people employ when they want to try to brush Hillary or Obama as "radicals") but I found her comment interesting. I do know that I often wonder why so much energy is invested in attempting bi-partisan ship with another side that clearly has no interest in being bi-partisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think that they're doing this in order
to demonstrate to the electorate that the other side has no interest in bipartisanship; that this will crystallize prior to the 2010 elections and the Republicans are going to lose AGAIN, if this strategery(sic) works. The Dems will be able to recite a litany of projects/legislation which the RWers railed against and the Repubs will once again, be painted into their corner. they made a Faustian deal with theextremists and Mephistopheles has come calling.

You and I know this is true...convincing the masses is another story...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. nice try...
it's the dems that are the roadblock
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. He knows that...
he found out reading DU...don'tcha know?

'Nice try' to you...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. you're confusing me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. george will = pompous shit
Edited on Sun Jul-26-09 10:10 AM by spanone
it should have been obvious from the very first vote that republicans had no intentions whatsoever of bipartisanship. it's not in their dna.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. I can safely say I never was left wanting more Ronald Reagan.
Or George Will...

By the way, Will is outnumbered on This Week today and he's getting extra snippy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davsand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
9. I was kinda hoping Donna Brazille was gonna get up and beat the snot outta George Will.
Just once I wanted to see it happen. I actually made this comment to my husband while that segment was going and he agreed with me.

Will really was pretty snarky this morning.



Laura
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. I don't think George's Bran Buds are working...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. how easily they forget that that AWOL WAR CRIMINAL was on EVERY FUCKING DAY
even AFTER the Elections, and NOBODY said a PEEP about that TRAVESTY!!!

And even I, though I disliked it, thought that, well, that AWOL WAR CRIMINAL was "pResident" and I have to just wait for a few more days...

good god, these people have NO SHAME!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. They only say this about Democratic presidents. It goes back to the Roosevelts...
who, actually, were hugely more reported than Herbert Hoover and used all mediums to get the message out. In addition, the use of and ownership of radio was greatly expanding. So, it really was hard to avoid the Roosevelts. ER received more letters in her first year in theWhite House than Herbert Hoover received in four years as president. Really.

GWB was a stale re-run from Day One. Emphasis on 'stale'. Same images recycled every six months. Laura hiding in the White House. Is she smoking?

But the Obama administration and family has so many more compelling stories to tell and images to convey. Tuskegee Airmen. First dog. MO and Liz at the Buck House, the swingset, Biden, Hillary, healthcare reform...

The R's are insanely jealous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. I posted this yesterday about a similar comment that some other shill made about Obama
This must be the new *meme*. To the Repukes and corporate media whores, Obama is always too........ Too bad for them most people simply.don't.care about a POTUS who is, in nearly every way, far superior than most of our last few Presidents. More signs that they are grasping at straws hopelessly trying to bring him down - and seeming to FAIL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
8. he'd be on t.v. a lot less if they didn't worry about his birth certificate...
all of fox news is about complaining about Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. of course when he was overseas they were saying he needs to be back here touting his healthcare
whining sob's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. Ah yes, George Will and Ronald Reagan
Will secretly coached Reagan before his presidential debate with Jimmy Carter, had access to a briefing book stolen from the Carter campaign, and then had the gall to go on national TV after the debate to say what a terrific job Reagan had done against Carter. If you're looking for George Will's integrity, professional or otherwise, you might as well be looking for the Loch Ness monster; neither exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I had forgotten all about that! What a memory you have! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC