Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flying Under the Radar: Administration's Bill to Control Medicare

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 11:26 AM
Original message
Flying Under the Radar: Administration's Bill to Control Medicare
Edited on Sun Jul-26-09 11:38 AM by clear eye
from Medicare Update

July 17, 2009

Obama Administration Releases Independent Medicare Advisory Council Act of 2009


The proposed law is billed as giving the President sole authority to approve or disapprove a package of rate changes in Medicare rates recommended by an appointed advisory board unless the Congress passes a Joint Resolution of Congress within 30 days disapproving of the changes. Neither the President nor Congress would be able to break up the package and approve some, but not others, of the proposed changes.

BUT THE KICKER IS that the law also authorizes the 5-member Independent Medicare Advisory Council to create broader "reforms" without limitation that will automatically become law unless the President "disapproves" them or Congress can mobilize to pass a disapproval resolution w/i the brief 30-day period.

And Congress would be prohibited under the act from making any law, whatsoever, regulating any aspect of Medicare on its own!

Even judicial recourse is restricted:


...a person adversely affected by the Council's approved recommendations would have to file an action in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia within 30 days of the President's approval.

However, the scope of the review would be limited to whether the Council's recommendation exceeded the scope of the Council's authority for determining annual payment updates or making reforms. No other judicial review of the recommendations of the Council, or of the President's approval or disapproval of recommendations, would be available.

Of course since the proposed law in its present form doesn't stipulate any limitations on what the Council can do, such a challenge would inevitably fail.

In a letter to Pelosi accompanying the proposed Act, Peter Orzag of the OMB said,

{Pres. Obama}expressed his openness to ideas about giving special consideration to the recommendations of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC). One constructive approach to implementing this idea is embodied in legislation introduced by Senator Rockefeller that would make MedPAC an independent Executive Branch agency, empowering it to improve efficiency and performance throughout the Medicare system.

A similar approach to creating a more dynamic and efficient Medicare system is embodied in the attached draft legislation.


The Rockefeller legislation similarly looks to remove Medicare from the control of Congress and place it in the hands of a newly executized MedPAC ostensibly to control costs. However as MedPAC is historically controlled by the AMA, and has repeatedly rejected reducing physician payments or the creation of a program to crack down on the largest segment of unnecessary expenditure--fraudulent billing by MD's of procedures not performed--the serious cost cutting would most likely involve significant cutbacks in coverage and/or the addition of means testing.

Here are the bones of his bill from The Congressional Record - Senate:

S. 1110. A blll to amend tltle XVIII of
the Social Securlty Act to create a sensible
infrastructure for delivery system
reform by renamlng the Medicare Payment
Advisory Commission, making
the Commlssion an executive branch
agency, and providing the Commission
new resoulces and authority to implement
Medicare payment policy; to the
Committee on Finance.
Mr. ROCKEFELLER. Mr. President. I
rlse today to introduce the Medicare
Payment Advisory Commlssion
MedPAC Reform Act, legislation to
Elevate MedPAC to an executive
branch entity and give it the resources
and authority to implement Medicare
payment policies.


...this legislation also establishes
three new advlsory councils to
assist them in their decision-making:
Council of Health and Economic Advisors,
a Consumer Advisory Council,
and a Federal Health Advisory Council
with representatives from the health
care industry.
Lastly, MedPAC's authority to analyze
health servlces research is also enhanced
in this legislation by providing
them with additional resources and
staff to bolster their current analytical
role. Glven the limitations of the current
Medicare demonstration process,
this legislatlon provldes new authority
and resources to MedPAC to design and
evaluate new payment, models through
Medicare demonstrations.

I strongly feel that establishing
MedPAC as an independent executive
branch agency--which can only happen
through an act of Congress--is the type
of bold step forward that can truly
transform our delivery system.


Please mobilize everyone you know to beg, demand, plead that Congressmembers not put the control and viability of Medicare outside of the representative side of our government. I also encourage DUers to put posts similar to this one up on other blogs, such as Dkos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enlightenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good grief.
This is a step away from privatizing Medicare.
When are we going to stop allowing this crap? We're a nation of f'ing sheep. What the hell is so difficult to understand about 'separation of powers' and 'checks and balances'?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Is this an effort to strangle Medicare reimbursement levels even further?
Who is fighting for increasing reimbursement levels?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. This is an effort to do a lot more than that.
Edited on Sun Jul-26-09 11:54 AM by clear eye
The "advisory" panels whose members may come from anywhere, including the private insurance industry, and which will be the sole body authorized to create any proposed changes to the system, would be able to turn Medicare into a Medicaid-like program, complete w/ means testing, and/or drastically restrict permitted procedures for the elderly under the guise of cost/benefit. As a result of either change, middle-class or higher citizens wouldn't use it anymore, and it will become as reviled as any dysfunctional welfare program can get. Working class retirees who paid into it all their adult life, will suffer and die with substandard care. Never again could Medicare be held up as an example of a worthy health care financing system to emulate. The protection we had by Medicare being too popular for a Congressperson to dare tamper with will be removed. They can basically gut it, and if Congress doesn't drop everything and move fast enough, there's nothing we could do to stop it. Then Congress can deny responsibility for the disaster by pointing out that it was this rogue executive branch agency, not they, who did all the damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
22. It's bad enough that the Obama administration would have this authority.
Even if he doesn't use it to gut Medicare, what about the next president? What would Junior have done with this power? This is horrible, Medicare is being attacked from all sides. Medicare for all is the solution and private insurance is the problem. But they are killing the solution to drag us further into their privatized quagmire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. This bill was introduced by Rockefeller... congress is handing it over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
5. It just keeps getting worse.
I thought with the last election we'd at least get a bit of a reprieve. Apparently not. They don't just want to hand the insurance companies 45 million mandated new buyers via the current health care reform, they want to push the majority baby boomers eligible for medicare in the next decade and a half into mandated, overpriced, for profit private insurance through budget cuts and means testing.

Can you imagine what a republican president will do with this new "sole authority". That a democrat would propose it is beyond belief.

Thanks so much for posting about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Please keep this kicked.
It's awfully important.

:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. Forwarded to Big Ed.
Hope he uses it. Thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Thank you.
You've jogged my mind. I should send it to Thom Hartmann and Rachel Maddow. As soon as I calm down I will. I stumbled over this info while I was looking for what provisions, if any, HR 3200 had for Medicare. This situation was no more fun for me to read and report than it is for DUers to read my OP. Had to do something, though. Whew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Do you think I should send it to Glenn Greenwald, too? n/t
Edited on Sun Jul-26-09 12:57 PM by clear eye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Can't hurt to spread the word.
Edited on Sun Jul-26-09 02:03 PM by dgibby
Send it to Keith, too. I've been sending all health care related threads to Big Eddie and all the C St stuff to Rachel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Imagine, for a moment, Mitt Romney, "Bobby" Jindal, or John McCain
with control over this proposed new Council.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. This must be part of Obama's plan to move billions from Medicare to help pay for reform.
This is very disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. Next up---Social Security privatization to pay for reform. Wait for it.
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. The "Centrist" Democrats are going to do...
...what the Republicans failed to do.....
KILL Medicare.

Social Security is NEXT.


....but have you SEEN Michele's arms?
and the puppy is sooooo cute!



"There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans. I want us to compete for that great mass of voters that want a party that will stand up for working Americans, family farmers, and people who haven't felt the benefits of the economic upturn."---Paul Wellstone


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I have read that Rahm's brother (Zeke?) is big on privatizing Medicare. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
15. I'd say we've entered truly tragic territory but that would be a disservice
to the communities beneath the mountaintops still being removed and the soldiers still stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&R (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lefthandedlefty Donating Member (247 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
17. If we got single payer there would be no need for medicare
Medcaid for all everyone I know with medicaid is happy with it although I don`t think it will pay for narcotics and they pay a one or two dollar co-pay and can change doctors just not on a daily bases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clear eye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #17
23. Medicare as it is now is fine; in the big cities, Medicaid is a disaster.
Clinics, long waits, substandard facilities, few specialists who are almost always doctors that no one who had a choice would want.

If you can manage it, get to DC on Thursday for the single payer lobbying and rally. The organizers from your state can be found on healthcare-NOW.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
latebloomer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-26-09 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
19. Well, it's change, isn't it?
You can believe that!

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-27-09 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
21. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC