Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, why did Michele Bachmann vote yes on the resolution saying that Obama was born in Hawaii?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 04:54 AM
Original message
Poll question: So, why did Michele Bachmann vote yes on the resolution saying that Obama was born in Hawaii?
Oh no, the birthers lost Michele Bachmann! But why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. she won in 2008 with less than 50 percent of the votes
and less than 3 percent more votes than her opponent.

below is from wiki. without the indie candidate she may have lost. and she has had many other moments since that election. some in the party probably told her if she doesn't vote this way she will lose next year.

<With all precincts reported, Bachmann won 46.41% to 43.43%.<32> Because Tinklenberg was running as a DFLer in the Democratic primary this allowed candidate Bob Anderson to run in the Independence party primary unopposed despite not having the Independence endorsement. Anderson received 10% of the vote.>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azurnoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Minnesota's allowing 3rd party indies is a sword that cuts both
Edited on Tue Jul-28-09 05:58 AM by azurnoir
ways it's good for democracy but usually really bad for dems, that is really how the Franken-Colemen recount controversy got started there was an indie named dean barkley that got 487,000 mostly dem votes without him Franken would have won by a landslide
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 05:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. she was assured that her uninformed supporters would not be informed
of the vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
4. She probably thought Hawaii was a foreign country
just my guess
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. PLEASE EDIT the Poll for THIS option
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I wish I could, too much time has passed though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. She saw a chance at hypocrisy and instinctively went for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
optimal-tomato Donating Member (243 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. "I push-ed a button, but I don't 'amember which one?!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Island Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
8. She didn't understand the question. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
10. Because someone got to her
and told her that making a stink to attempt to remove a "whereas" clause from a non-binding resolution was just too petty and stupid even for her.

I wish she had proposed an ammendment to strike the clause, because there would then have been an up or down vote on the single issue. This is why someone got to her to stop it, because this would have created a definite record. Instead they can now say that they voted to celebrate 50 years of statehood, and all the rest of the resolution is non-binding.

However, the conspiracy theorists will likely be unimpressed and find that their representatives sold them out. Their entire argument hangs on vapor, and this resolution, as meaningless as it is, is far more substantive than most of their claims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
11. Cantor did his job? I know as Democrats, it may seem hard to believe a whip does its job,
but I would think that they know better than letting their guys and gales vote stupidly.

If only Dems could learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. She is a Superior Being - Bachmann operates at a level of crazy far above the Birthers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC