Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama just stated at the AARP town hall that he WANTS A PUBLIC OPTION...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:17 PM
Original message
Obama just stated at the AARP town hall that he WANTS A PUBLIC OPTION...
just letting everyone know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wants and Demands are two completely different things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Lex est quod rex vult. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Windy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Its up to congress to put the bill out. I hope that the public option obama wants is in there.
I am going to continue to contact members of congress and have signed the petition regarding the public option that has been cirulated by Leahy/Durbin/Scheumer...

Others should do the same
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. "Its up to congress to put the bill out. "
When Bush was President legislation routinely was written within his administration, then acted on by the Congressional Republicans (and many Dems).

This issue deserves nothing less than the same from the Obama administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. In fairness, not always
Remember immigration reform?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. The reception that legislation recieved from the voters needs
...... to be the model we adopt to defeat any health care bill that fails to provide a strong public option.

Sure it might embarrass the WH, but its our lives at stake here, not theres.

They HAVE the best health care already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Yes, and Cheney sat in on their meetings.
No one was allowed to get out of line and Cheney interfered on a regular basis. We don't want to go back to that way either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Problem is, some people do want to go back that way.
Edited on Tue Jul-28-09 01:31 PM by Nicholas D Wolfwood
They just only want it to happen when the President has a (D) after his name, which is hypocrisy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Strong arming Congress is a time honored tradition
Edited on Tue Jul-28-09 01:32 PM by DJ13
Used by both party's in the past.

At least, back when our party had balls and principles they wanted to uphold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. You may not remember it, but during those "good ol' days"...
Congressional majorities of the same party as the President actually fought back with as much, if not more vigor. By today's standards, FDR might as well have been working with Tom DeLay's House of Representatives the way Democrats fought with him over power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:27 PM
Original message
And Congress is
not just the Senate Finance Committee. There will be two bills in the Senate that will have to be reconciled, the Baucus/Grassley nastiness and the much better one from Kennedy/Dodd. And whatever they eventually vote on, will have to be reconciled with the House. Not that I am not worried and frustrated (a LOT), but this is far from over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Fake Democrats will not like this one bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. What was their name again, the "Blue Balls Democrats"?
:yoiks::yoiks:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. "Fake Democrats"?
I'll bet I was a registered (and voting,) member of the Democratic Party before you were born.

So, in other words, those of us who call it the way it is -- President Obama's insisting he "wants" a public option, but doing virtually nothing to make sure it happens, such as any attempt to rein in private insurance companies -- are now "fake Democrats"?

Oh. It was criticizing him, right? We must never point out that he's inconsistent. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. My post has absolutely nothing to do with you
Read the next post. That's who I am talking about. BTW, Were you born before 1949?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. Opinion in abeyance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. Glad he's not backing down... but I wish he'd threaten to veto a bill without it. (nt)
Edited on Tue Jul-28-09 01:34 PM by redqueen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
16. I enjoy hearing him speak.
And that was a wonderful presentation, but one part of it was disturbing to me.

"Nobody will be forced," he says. That's simply not true. Many people who lack insurance now will be forced to buy it (whether they can afford it or not) or become criminals.

Evidently, that is a price the President is willing to make me pay to get this reform. I will not give him credit for generosity, however.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. His whole rationale is dispeling misinformation and reassuring about change. He knows he will
push public option, or there is no competition. Forceful noise now will not get us through the committee, but as reconciliation and conference work done, explainging the why of it more necessary.

Meanwhile, Obama is looking reasonable and oh so articulate. Having listened to as much bi-partisan co-operation BS as he can for show, as well as real principle of our guy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkkyosemite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. For the first time Obama called the Public Option controversial!! And his staff Melany Barnes was
more happy in an interview today about the bi-partianship instead of the public option when asked. Wishy washy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
20. We are going to get something they label a "Public Option",
but if HR 3200 is any indication, it will be an ineffective token that is NOT available to most Americans, and will do NOTHING to "keep the Health Insurance Industry Honest" or "drive down the cost of Health Care".

The 72% of Americans who support a REAL "Public Option" are going to be Screaming Pissed when they see what our "Democratic" Congress has done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkkyosemite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. And the unions are pushing it hard in commercials on TV HR3200...We need to pusy HR 676
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarjorieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
21. Anyone remember what he said about drugs, after praising the dinut deal. Can we negotiate as he's
claimed as a cost saver, or will we have to add it in reconciliation? Let's push this, if so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-28-09 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. What kind of public option and is he willing to fight for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC