Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama's Military Is Spying on U.S. Peace Groups

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cronopio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 01:56 AM
Original message
Obama's Military Is Spying on U.S. Peace Groups
Source: Huffington Post

Anti-war activists in Olympia, Wash., have exposed U.S. Army spying and infiltration of their groups, as well as intelligence gathering by the U.S. Air Force, the federal Capitol Police and the Coast Guard.

The infiltration appears to be in direct violation of the Posse Comitatus Act preventing U.S. military deployment for domestic law enforcement, and may strengthen congressional demands for a full-scale investigation of U.S. intelligence activities, like the Church Committee hearings of the 1970s.

Brendan Maslauskas Dunn asked the City of Olympia for documents or e-mails about communications between the Olympia police and the military relating to anarchists, Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) or the Industrial Workers of the World (Dunn's union). Dunn received hundreds of documents. One e-mail contained reference to a "John J. Towery II," who activists discovered was the same person as their fellow activist "John Jacob."

Dunn told me: "John Jacob was actually a close friend of mine, so this week has been pretty difficult for me. He said he was an anarchist. He was really interested in SDS. He got involved with Port Militarization Resistance (PMR), with Iraq Vets Against the War. He was a kind person. He was a generous person. So it was really just a shock for me." ...

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/amy-goodman/obamas-military-is-spying_b_246655.html



I don't necessarily agree with what "Obama's Military" implies, but that is the exact title of Amy's report.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Keep in mind
this is the Obama who's DOJ defended the Bush warrantless wiretapping.

and this is the guy who was supposed to be a Constitutional scholar? Scary!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. +1
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napoleon_in_rags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
44. From somebody who lives in this neck of the woods, local politics:
Edited on Wed Jul-29-09 04:20 PM by napoleon_in_rags
I'm posting it as a response to you for visibility.

As I recall, our city council passed some ordinance blocking military (naval) vehicles from the Puget sound around here, which was kind of silly. But I think some nuclear submarine was supposed to come into the bay for people to see, this interfered. They overturned that and then some military thing was going on at the bay, but the local peace protesters tried to blockade it (this was late in Bushes term) and they were all arrested. After that and in to Obamas term, I've noticed more military vehicles flying over. Maybe unrelated, but part of me has always wondered if somebody in the military wanted to make a point. But that totally aside from that, the conflict between military and local peace protesters goes back to that, and that happened in Bush's term. I really don't think this is Obama's creation, which some people seem to be reading into the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ControlledDemolition Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
61. 'Elections' are more and more becoming puppet shows. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frog92969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 02:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. I hope this one doesn't get swept under the carpet
I mean how lumpy can it get?

It's VERY hard to "look forward".:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
booley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. he probably inherited this issue from Shrub
HOWEVER.... inherited or not it is now his.

He can fix it or do a another "look away" like he's done so far with torture.

Time will tell
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swagman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. isn't it a bit too early to be blaming the current president for this ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. no, they have shown no signs of reversing course
not that it matters what we think anyway
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. Absolutely not. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. When will it be time?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
49. I swear apologists will still be asking that when Obama's administration
is preparing to leave office. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #49
71. If people who insist on fairness to Obama are 'apologists'
doesn't that make you "Blame Obama First" people his political opponents and enemies?

Never mind. You believe every accusation against the guy that isn't mouthed by a Birther. Might as well debate John Kerry's medals with a Freeper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
18. The infiltration happened in 2007. How is that "Obama's Military"? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Where is the evidence this is continuing? There's zero evidence. Obama hatred is irrational.
Did you read/listen to the full story? This happened back in 2007. The reason the story came out now is because the Obama administration complied with a Freedom of Information Act request that allowed these people to find out they were being spied on.

Do you have any evidence this group is still being spied on? Any evidence that Obama even knows about this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quickesst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #30
48. Ha ha...
..."Do you have any evidence this group is still being spied on? Any evidence that Obama even knows about this?"

Look, it doesn't matter if this happened in 2007 under shrub's watch, and even if there is no proof that Obama is continuing the spying, he's president now, and that makes him culpable, and responsible. It's so easy to understand if you look at it from the perspective of someone who just cannot cope with having a winner in the white house. Damn that Obama for beating McShame. :sarcasm:

The stare right through you with glassed over eyes, and never registering result of your request is sadly, par for the course for many here. Thanks.
quickesst

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clixtox Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #30
69. The way I read the story it was the Olympia Police...
Edited on Thu Jul-30-09 02:59 AM by clixtox
not the federal government that complied with a request, I don't know why, to release their communications, included were these super-sensitive bits of information.

Obama's administration might get some credit for not litigating this release on some bogus pretext or another. Whoops, I guess not...

"Larry Hildes, an attorney representing Washington activists, says the U.S. attorney prosecuting the cases against them, Brian Kipnis, specifically instructed the Army not to hand over any information about its intelligence-gathering activities, despite a court order to do so." From the article cited in the original post.

Which is why Dunn's request to Olympia and the documents he obtained are so important. The military is supposed to be barred from deploying on U.S. soil, or from spying on citizens.
I do hope that if Obama wasn't aware of this particular situation before, he will be now. He may have not even known of this program before this news story or whether it is still extant now, or not. This is a perfect opportunity to make some fundamental changes including terminating ALL illegal domestic spying on American citizens.

Or not...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #28
36. Why can't you haters learn to read?
I triple dog dare you to quote the part of the interview where they talk about the spying that happened under Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #36
50. The issue is that it happened under bush
but Obama hasn't dismantled any of it. None of the surveillance powers have been disavowed, disowned or dismantled. Obama has retained the surveillance powers, and pushed for immunity for the telecom companies that cooperated in the spying (and might still be cooperating).

That is where Obama's involvement is. If Obama really was against spying he would come out and say he was against it. He would condemn it. And he would allow the means of spying to be revealed and dismantled. But he's doing none of those things.

You can't play dumb and insist that Obama is not involved in any way when he's embracing the means of spying on citizens and protecting the people who have done it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #50
52. The accusation is that he is using the military
to spy on US citizens on US soil. That accusation is false and this thread us the usual Obama hating, Ron Paul humping nutjobs letting their overactive imaginations and paranoid fantasies get the better of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #52
54. Now you are saying something completely different.
Saying that it happened under Bush, and it hasn't been proven that it's still happening under Obama, that's okay. That's based on known fact.

Saying that it ISN'T happening under Obama, that's not based on known fact. That's faith. Now you're just making things up. If you're going to slam people for supposedly making things up then you should stick to known facts.

It is known that Obama has not dismantled the means and methods of spying. It is known that Obama is protecting those who participated in the spying. It is suspected that he MIGHT be continuing the spying but there is no evidence yet of this. If you want to argue intelligently then present evidence that Obama is not or could not be spying. Present evidence that he is dismantling or intends to dismantle the means of spying on US citizens.

Otherwise you're just as much of a nutjob as you accuse others of being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #54
56. Accusations must be based in fact. The accuser has the burden.
All that is known is that a Bushie US attorney who hasn't been replaced yet is mucking things up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Everyone has a burden of fact.
Everyone should speak based on fact as much as we're able. Just because you're supporting someone doesn't mean you can spout fantasy based on faith.

And, yes, if a Bush attorney hasn't been replaced, then guess what. He's now an Obama attorney.

That doesn't change the need to speak based on facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #59
72. You treated an subsubstantiated smear against Obama
as a fact. So, yes, we 'apologists' will stand up to you leftwing Swiftboaters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just-plain-Kathy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #50
60. You said it ThomCat. ...I love smart people. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #28
58. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ControlledDemolition Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #18
62. With every new President the military should restate their oath to the constitution. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. so much change to make believe in!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gimama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
53. YOU nailed it
...& I needed a smile!
This story, & the accused 7 "terra-ists" in NC story is really getting to me, today..
please ck. out www.cnn.com/crime , see the interview of Mrs. Boyd, her details, "the fbi tricked me", turns my stomach. And YES, these CRIMES happened under Pres. Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clixtox Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. Olympia? Who would have thought!

If this is happening in Olympia, WA, what must be happening across the nation?

This information has huge implications.

The true nature of the hoax about our "rights" and "liberty" is becoming apparent to even the congenitally obtuse.

It's a police state, folks!

The government is horrified that the coming hard times will cause that ol' revolutionary spirit to manifest again...

The "government" means the super rich folks who actually run things through the politicians they own, or rent(cheap!) as needed.

Lumpy rug indeed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 05:14 AM
Response to Original message
8. Too Much Drama For Obama. (again)
He'll have to ask the Joint Chiefs to "make a determination" as to the feasibility of acknowledging this reality sometime next year. Or perhaps trumpet another (oxymoronic) "banning" order -- this time for something that's been a crime for 130 years.

Something like this could really distract from placing the optional fig leaf over the "public area" of our healthgraft system.

--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. Some more of that change we were all promised
Yep, changing from Bush to Nixon, mmm-hmm. I wonder when the enemies list will be drawn up, or perhaps it already is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
41. Put up or shut up.
What spying activities happened under Obama. Quote from the interview please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
10. Some people think Obama controls the goverment? LOL.
Panetta doesn't even know hat programs the CIA has running! Bush USAs are still in place. The list goes on.

Just because he took the oath has little to do with actually being in charge of the USG.

It is like a blind mouse trying to control an elephant with a giant R branded on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
11. Why is the US govt comprised of so many fascist cocksuckers?
...and why do passive Americans accept their fascist cocksuckery with such indifference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuvuj Donating Member (874 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. Visualize lots of sheep...
...being guarded by herd dogs...ostensibly to protect them from the marauding wolves? The sheep have been constantly told that the dogs are there to protect them from the wolves....some sheep are having "hallucinations" where they can't really tell the guard dogs from the wolves. Some think that maybe the guard dogs and the wolves have some kind of agreement.

The top 1 to 5% are standing along the fences at the edge of the field...watching it all happen....dog biscuits at the ready...fleecing the sheep on a systematic basis. But the sheep like the grass and calm and raising lambs so well...what do they care? Except when they hear more scary stories about the wolves. But the top 1 to 5% are getting worried that their scam might be upset by the few sheep that are starting to wake up....and there might be problems with keeping the grass green...there might be just too many sheep...somebody might knock the fence down...some sheep might be on to their fleecing...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 08:11 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. very astute analogy wuvuj!!!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. Apropos analogy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
34. why do fucking idiots try to pin something that happened under bush on Obama
stupid little sheep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clixtox Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #34
66. Which "fucking idiots" are you referring to as "stupid little sheep"?


Everyone on this thread seems to understand the fact that this infiltration of a politically active group initially occurred during the Bush administration.

No one posting here, that I have noticed, has tried "to pin something that happened under Bush on Obama".

The issue now is whether such blatantly proscribed activities are still happening today, 6 months into the Obama presidential term.

Every freedom loving American, regardless of political party or perspective, has to be concerned.

Either we are a nation of laws, enforced and adjudicated regardless of any criteria except justice for all, or we are not.

That is the question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #66
74. That's why they're saying Obama=Nixon.
That's why the title says "Obama's military is spying on peace groups."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ControlledDemolition Donating Member (901 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #11
65. Hitler got into power with less than 35% of the popular vote. GWB swindled over 50%!
Edited on Thu Jul-30-09 01:04 AM by ControlledDemolition
It's simply a question of.. 'dumb... and dumber'. But which is which?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
12. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
17. How could it be "Obama's military" if this happened before he was elected? More lies
Edited on Wed Jul-29-09 07:48 AM by HamdenRice
According to the DemocracyNow story, these groups were infiltrated IN 2007.

How was it "Obama's Miliary" in 2007?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Is it going on now? I guess that is the question.
You make a very good point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Because he REFUSES to do anything about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. Any evidence of that? Because the DN story is that the Obama administration gave them FOIA documents
that enabled them to find out that they were being spied on. Sounds like contrary to the hysteria, the administration is doing something about it.

FOIA = Freedom of Information Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. I don't give Obama credit for following the FOIA laws.
But I do blame him for his "looking ahead" crap because it's his job to look back.

The thing about crimes is that they've all happened in the past.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. So you admit you have no evidence this practice is continuing, but change the subject?
As I said, Obama hatred is mostly irrational.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. If the law is not being enforced, it's being thwarted.
Your stance is not only irrational, but downright un-American.

Take that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clixtox Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #31
75. Nope they didn't, the Olympia Police handed over their docs.


The feds were opposed, according to the article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
22. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. piss off, honey.
and learn to read. this happened in 2007. oh and shove your "bunco obomber crap right back up the stinkin' orifice you pulled it out of.

alerted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
25. It's ok, his election made history. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
27. Bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
29. Obama-hating paranoid freaks should go back to Freeperville.
If you read the actual interview, there is no claim that any of this happened under the Obama admin or with his knowledge.

Good gawd this site draws all kind of Ron Paul-style militia loving nutters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #29
33. it's fucking disgusting that this piece of stinking shit gets rec after rec
and no you little geniuses, I'm not saying that Obama is above criticism. This isn't criticism, it's calumny. Do try and learn the difference. Not that most of you have a clue as to what the word calumny means. Go look it up.

And calling Obama a swindler and murderer is just fucked up.

Sick little fucked up morons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. ^^^^^^^^ This.
Edited on Wed Jul-29-09 03:53 PM by BlooInBloo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. So, cali
Tell us how you REALLY feel.

:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. How I really feel? OK. I really feel that shit stains who post that Obama is a murderer should
do something unspeakable and horribly painful to themselves. I really feel that it reflects badly on DU that posts like that aren't deleted.
And I know that some little moron sheep leap to believe lying ass stories about Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. Yes, it is.
And yes, they are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #29
55. If it isn't Ron Paul nutters it is Ralph Nader loonies
We can't win.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clixtox Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #55
68. You betcha! Everything is wonderful, our government loves and respects us...

and only horrible people could believe otherwise.

After all, this is the greatest country of all time!

Bar none, now or ever, we're number one!

Go USA

Damn extremists, trying to undermine the two-party system that has created America, this absolute paradise on Earth.

Liberty and justice for all!!!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
43. Unrec and alert this garbage!!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #43
63. You would alert on an Amy Goodman article?
Is there a full moon tonight?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #63
73. Goodman lied in this article.
She is a propagandist with generally good stands on political issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Becky72 Donating Member (457 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
45. Not nice
If this practice doesn't start lawsuits might come their way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gimama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
47. disgusting misuse of resources
& further dessimation of OUR Constitutional Rights.
No surprise, tho, to my Friends in Veterans for PEACE or Vietnam Vets Against war.
FYi: also avail. at www.democracyNow.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
51. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-29-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
57. yeah.. because peace is so threatening to war, and it's profits
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
64. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConsAreLiars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
67. I first became aware of this Very Common Practice under Johnson and Nixon.
Edited on Thu Jul-30-09 02:21 AM by ConsAreLiars
What has changed is not that some President, this one or any past one, has issued an order stopping this, but only that the police-state agencies -- city, state, FBI, CIA, NSA and the several DEA and so on -- have become ever more tightly integrated, most recently through the "fusion centers."

The suggestion that some sillies here make that Obama has suddenly put a stop to all this is one of those ludicrous claims that really requires more than a little bit of evidence, certainly at least some.

(edit to fix some punctuation stuff and add NSA to the very short list)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
armyowalgreens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
70. I'm not seeing a lot of hard evidence to support the idea that this happened under Obama's watch...
I'm not saying that it couldn't have happened. But this seems like a lot of hearsay and little fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC