Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

High School Admins Coerce Cheerleader for Facebook Password

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 05:50 AM
Original message
High School Admins Coerce Cheerleader for Facebook Password
In a strange twist of social media lawsuits, a cheerleader at Mississippi’s Pearl High School may have had her first amendment rights (and then some) violated by her cheer coach. Along with her parents, she’s now suing the school district, its Superintendant, the school’s Principal, and her coaches for their involvement in coercing her to hand over her Facebook login credentials, and then exposing the sensitive information they found.

The suit claims that the 16 year-old cheerleader, Miranda Jackson, was forced to hand over her Facebook password to a coach during school hours on September 10, 2007, even though she had never used Facebook at school. Tommie Hill, a cheer teacher and sponsor, allegedly used that info to log in to Jackson’s account and, “disseminated the information within Jackson’s Facebook account to fellow Pearl High School teacher, dance and cheer sponsor Tiffany Durr, cheer trainer Corey Byrd, Principal Ray Morgigno, Superintendant John Ladner, and other unknown individuals.”

That offline spread of Jackson’s private FacebookFacebook information reportedly led to some pretty negative side effects with the girl being “punished and humiliated.” The lawsuit goes on to claim that Jackson was barred from cheer practices and participating in school sponsored events.

http://mashable.com/2009/07/29/cheerleader-lawsuit/

I want to know more. This is just wrong on the face of it. What in the world did she post? How can they justify what they did?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. Civil liberties violations 101
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Clear violation of Miranda rights.
had to say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 05:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. As unfair as it seems, young people need to KNOW that anything they post online
Edited on Thu Jul-30-09 05:59 AM by SoCalDem
is PUBLIC, or can be made public.

It's like sending a postcard through the mail. You better not mind other people reading what you wrote.

In retrospect, she might have been better off telling them all "NO", and then getting busy tidying up her Facebook page as best she could.

Of course if they knew she HAD a facebook page, someone must have visited the site. Isn't that the whole purpose? What good would having the password do them? Couldn't they just look her up on Facebook?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imdjh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It seems that parents need to parent.
In my family, my parents did sex education early on, because I was extremely sensitive when it came to body parts and that sort of thing. I was one of those kids an older kid could wreck just by talking dirty.

My parents also educated us about our rights. I'm not talking about this belligerent "you can't touch me" or "You're not my mother." kind of defiance behind some notion of rights. My parents educated me about my rights to be secure in my person, in my privacy, and that if I felt violated by an adult at school or elsewhere I was to fight to have a parent present, regardless of the situation. And in their part of the bargain, my parents were ALWAYS the drop-everything kind of parents, day or night. The other difference between them and some of the modern "my kid can do no wrong" parents who teach defiance, is that calling my parents into the situation only guaranteed me justice, it didn't guarantee me a favorable outcome. When I was wrong, I was wrong. I have had to apologize to all sorts of people when I was wrong. Only ONCE was the order of my parents unjust, and it was in a situation beyond their control and that's what they told me when ordering me to apologize to a petty man in a position of power over my father. And then they got out from under that POS asap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Facebook profiles are generally private
You have to be a friend to look at them, provided you set it up right. That's probably why they wanted the password.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. That would be an expectation of privacy, wouldn't it? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. I would assume so, yes (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. "Couldn't they just look her up on Facebook?" No they couldn't
Properly used, Facebook privacy settings prevent others from viewing the contents off your page unless specifically permitted to do so.

She should never have given them her password. Not only could they then see what was on her page, they could plant damaging material on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. According to the article, the coach wanted to use it to spam for the cheerleading squad
She logged in to post ads for the cheerleading squad's appearances on the cheerleader's profile. Or am I misreading that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
intaglio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Wrong - according to the original article
from WLBT3
http://www.wlbt.com/Global/story.asp?S=10806760

The coach read private mails between this girl and another that contained "profanity".

Now it may shock a few adults, but kids do use foul language between themselves from 9 or 10 yo onward and usually grow out of it by the time they're, say, 30; spying on a kid and punishing them for such use is abuse of privacy and abuse of power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 06:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
18. Doesn't she have the right to post anything she wants to
as long as it was lawful? Should be no need to clean up her facebook page should there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. Why do administrators think they have the right to do this?
There was a case maybe a month or two ago where a principal went through a student's phone and found "sexting" pictures on it. Why in the fuck was he looking through it in the first place? Confiscating the phones while school is in session is fine, but what right does he have to go through data on the phone? ESPECIALLY without a minor's guardian/lawyer present? I wonder if he was specifically looking for some nudie pics to gawk at.

Something tells me that Miranda and her friend were probably talking about the cheer coach behind her back (wow, high school students being gossipy, what are the odds?) and the cheer coach just couldn't handle that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
followthemoney Donating Member (745 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. It is very important that the young learn to accomodate ...
The needs of state tyranny at a very early age. Those who do not attempt to adapt to rights violations imposed by the state until adulthood will make very poor adjustment.

Remember, if it serves the interests of the state, all other interests must be subordinate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Chomsky 101: The education system is a weeding-out process for those too independent minded
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. I hope the coach "disappears"...
People like this are destroying your country. You're better off without them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. Need more information, but it does sound wrong.

I'll wait and see what forced and coerced means in this case as well as the information on the Facebook site.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. I see at least three 'Cheer teachers' or whatever
What do they teach at that school?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-30-09 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Cheer coach, Cheer sponsor, Cheer trainer. But surprisingly not cheerful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC