|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
RandySF (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-30-09 02:03 PM Original message |
Ortiz and Ramirez Said to Be on 2003 Baseball Doping List |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inthebrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-30-09 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
1. Well, the Mets got screwed in 2000 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharp_stick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-30-09 02:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. Yeah cause you know none of the Mets |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
inthebrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-30-09 05:28 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. On the 2000 Mets? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sharp_stick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-30-09 08:12 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. He's as implicated as Ortiz |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-30-09 02:08 PM Response to Original message |
2. (shrug) They all did it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
edbermac (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-30-09 02:33 PM Response to Original message |
4. So why are we hearing about this 5 years after the fact? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Southpaw07 (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-30-09 03:15 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. These results were supposed to be destroyed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brendan120678 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-30-09 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
5. I'm shocked.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
metapunditedgy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-30-09 03:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. I think these drug test leaks are being used by the owners to bust the players' union. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Southpaw07 (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-30-09 03:18 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. I think you are correct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeybee12 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-30-09 03:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. The results were not destoryed, hence they were able to be seized as evidence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 11th 2024, 06:22 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC