Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ford is on fire

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
boomerbust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 10:41 AM
Original message
Ford is on fire
52 week low 1.01 a share
Trading right now at 7.92 a share
To all you Obama nay sayers out there, instead of bashing Obama you should have been listening to him in regards to the direction he was going to take this nation. Ford might still be a good buy at 8 dollars a share.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yeay!
So glad I bought it at $1.60 a share! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. Beat you by a dime
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's probably just one of his big fancy corporatist tricks!
All that tumultuous voodoo of his!

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Call it a hunch, but it seems to me that the REAL economy is starting to percolate
Something seemed to change during this past week, and it's more than just stock prices.

I know, I know, it's not cool to be optimistic on DU, but I can't help it. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. what changed.....? attitudes....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. cash for clunkers is working
it is not clear that the rest of the economy will follow Detroit. Also, what happens when CFC taps out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. C4C isn't tapping out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. exactly....
I think (and hope and pray I am wrong) we are seeing the economy ball doing a small bounce on the floor of the economy as it comes slowly to a stop.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bleacher Creature Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. I think the technical term is "dead cat bounce".
No idea where that came from.

And yes, I hope you are wrong, but fear that you are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. ty for that: "dead cat bounce" I have learned a new term --
Edited on Fri Jul-31-09 11:28 AM by Tuesday Afternoon
A dead cat bounce is a figurative term used by traders in the finance industry to describe a pattern wherein a spectacular decline in the price of a stock is immediately followed by a moderate and temporary rise before resuming its downward movement, with the connotation that the rise was not an indication of improving circumstances in the fundamentals of the stock. It is derived from the notion that "even a dead cat will bounce if it falls from a great height".

The phrase has been used on the trading floors for many years. However the earliest recorded use of the phrase dates from 1985 when the Singaporean and Malaysian stock markets bounced back after a hard fall during the recession of that year. Journalist Christopher Sherwell of the Financial Times reported a stock broker as saying the market rise was a "dead cat bounce". It has also been used in reference to political polling numbers.<1>

The reasons for such a bounce can be technical, as investors may have standing orders to buy shorted stocks if they fall below a certain level or to cover certain option positions. Once those limits are reached, the buy orders are activated and the sudden rise in demand causes the price of the stock to rise as well. The bounce may also be the result of speculation. Since bounces often occur, traders buy into what they hope is the bottom of the market, expecting a bounce and thereby reaping a quick profit. Thus, the very act of anticipating a bounce can create and magnify it.

A market rise after a sharp fall can only really be seen to be a "dead cat bounce" with the benefit of hindsight. If the stock starts to fall again in the following days and weeks, then it was a true dead cat bounce. If the market starts to climb again after the first short bounce, then the continued rise in price action would be considered a trend reversal and not a dead cat bounce. Since this distinction only becomes obvious in hindsight, the evaluation may vary depending upon the initial and final points of reference.

from wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_cat_bounce
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
49. My thinking as well
Ford has benefited by GM and Chrysler going bankrupt and people not knowing where to buy.

I know this because my mother just recently bought a car and I fill in for my dad when she buys a car now.

The Ford guys told me as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. Well, as far as I know gravity doesn't affect the economy like it does a bouncing ball..
But people buying lots of new cars does. WE are the kinetic energy.

I'm still stunned how well the CFC program worked, I didn't expect that at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #23
50. Dead Cat Bounce is a wall street term
not a gravity term.

Ford is benefiting from GM and Chrysler's trouble. See my post above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #50
53. Yea, I know that.. My point is the real economy has nothing to do with Wall Street
At least it doesn't any more thanks to 8 years of Bushonomics.

This recovery will be driven and sustained by the people, not Wall Street. Fuck 'em.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
4. he is the anti-bush
King Midas in reverse, reversed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. No offense, but I don't see where Obama gets credit for Ford's success
Ford has been "on the right track" since they brought on Alan Mulally back in 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boomerbust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Maybe
But I think he should get a little credit. If he would have followed the Conservative line to liquidate GM and Chrysler, Ford would have been next in line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. No, Ford would've likely gained market share if Chrysler or GM folded...
"If he would have followed the Conservative line to liquidate GM and Chrysler, Ford would have been next in line."

No, this is mistaken. Obama's handling of the auto industry is not seen as either principled or successful here in metro-Detroit. It's seen as hypocritical in light of his treatment of Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. Wrong.
I worked there until '07, and luck and circumstances for other car makers is what is helping Ford.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Both Obama and Bernanke deserve LOTS of credit for this
Even though Ford was in a better position than GM or Chrysler, as a result of the financial crisis, there was a point at which there were virtually zero car loans being made available. The auto finance companies could not sell commercial paper or bundled auto loans, which meant they could not provide financing for buyers.

Ford was poised to follow the other two simply because the only way to buy cars would have been with cash.

The combined effect of the stimulus, cash for clunkers and the rescue of the auto finance market helped save Ford.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. If you believe that, then you should be thanking George W. Bush
for Ford's success, not President Obama. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. fuk that
it was FDR and you know it :-) Actually ford is where they are because they make some good business decision plus they build one hell of a good vehicle, cars and trucks. I'll put a ford built vehicle up against any foreign make and I'll come out on top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. The bigger point is that Obama has made no change to Bush era trade policy
Nor has he been kind to Detroit when compared to the largesse he's heaped upon Wall Street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. The best I remember it was the money causing the problem in the first place
ford was already building a good vehicle just no one was able to buy. That's the bigger point Actually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #31
37. Ford is harmed by our country's one way "free trade" agreements, just like GM, Chrysler
"That's the bigger point Actually."

Don't know what the significance of the capitalization is, but President Obama is a dedicated "free trader" (except as to Wall Street, which he feels should be taxpayer subsidized.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #24
44. I thanked Barnanke, who carried this out during the last months of Bush
But Bush had nothing to do with it. It was a Fed program.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. And How'd Bernanke get the job? "nothing to do with it" indeed!
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #45
57. But, but, but ... I thought the Fed was actually teh private bank!!11!1
Edited on Fri Jul-31-09 02:50 PM by HamdenRice
You wouldn't have been one of DU's Ron Paul crazies who has alleged that the Fed is actually a disguised private bank over which the government has no influence, would you?

The hallmark of political craziness is the holding of completely contradictory beliefs so long as they fit into one's warped, ideologically driven world view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #18
30. No doubt about that
President Obama and company are directly responsible for this, not saying they are the only ones mind you but without the stimulus it wasn't looking very good for anyone out here. We have a young Wise Man at the helm now and it'd be better for everyone if most of us got on the wagon. I guarantee that he can't be everything to everyone but he can and does be everything to our country. And that is what matters most. :hi: HR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. Some, like me, view the stock market as the greatest ponzi scheme ever inflicted on humanity.
Wall Street and Corporate America spend billions lobbying to crush unions and the concept of a living wage.

They use their stock price as leverage to undermine the working man/woman.

FUCK THE STOCK MARKET, FUCK EVERYTHING THAT IT STANDS FOR!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
10. It can be credited to Rush
Limbaugh he called for his listeners to boycott GM and Chrysler. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. What the idiot Limpballs forgets, Ford is UAW represented as well as GM, Chrysler.
Edited on Fri Jul-31-09 11:09 AM by Union Yes
Much of limpy's call to boycott was based on the fact the GM and Chrysler are UAW. Limpy hates unions and union workers.


And when I say hate, I mean seething hatred with a capitol H.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
safeinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. Every time the market dropped 50 points
Limbaugh says it is because or Obama. Never says a damn thing when it goes up.

Bought in at $1.82
Looks like a lot of savy DUers

My brother with 2 MBAs sold everything and got out of the market when I bought my shares. Then he bought back in 2 months ago. I asked him if you have to go to a fancy college to know when to sell at the lowest and buy back in when it goes higher. Good thing he has a sense of humor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
11. I have made a bundle
Bought 1000 shares back in November for $1.50 a share. :woohoo:

Sure wish I had bought more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
19. The talking heads on CNBC have been talking
of a much greater recovery than expected in Q3 and Q4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackDragna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
21. Do you think the grand casino is the best barometer of the nation?
Seriously. The market has, in the past, tended to go up when unemployment is high. Stocks also go higher when corporations do such nice things as gut their employment rolls and cut spending for "useless" things like research and development. Can we please wean ourselves off of the idea that what is good for stock prices is good for the country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
43. Since 1998 as stock market and unemployment rate tend to go in opposite directions.
http://seekingalpha.com/article/94300-unemployment-rates-recession-periods-and-stock-market-prices

The correlation is not perfect (I'm not sure any one thing correlates with stock prices), but the trends of stock prices and unemployment rates in opposite directions are easy to see. I didn't find charts to compare going back before 1998, but in the Depression and the 1970's unemployment was high and stock prices were low. In the 1960's and 1990's unemployment was low and stock prices rising.

If you have information that shows that "(t)he market has, in the past, tended to go up when unemployment is high. Stocks also go higher when corporations do such nice things as gut their employment rolls and cut spending for "useless" things like research and development", I'd be interested to see it. It's hard to imagine a company's stock price going up long term if it fires most of its employees and doesn't do any R and D. It might survive for a while but not long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
27. obama did`t have to bankrupt ford because ford had lots of cash.
ford was`t forced by the government to get rid of dealerships. the guy that runs ford knows what the hell he`s doing. obama`s crew did`t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
28. Huh? Why Is It At $1.56 on Sharebuilder???? Down .02
Edited on Fri Jul-31-09 11:37 AM by Beetwasher
Where are you seeing it at 7.92???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #28
35. Yahoo finance link;
Edited on Fri Jul-31-09 11:54 AM by A HERETIC I AM
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=f

Marketwatch.com link;
http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/f

Sharebuilder.com;
http://www.sharebuilder.com/

Type "F" in the "Get Quote" section. They have it at the same level the above links do. (give or take their respective reporting delays)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. Ahh! I Was Looking At The Wrong Symbol
Got it, thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #38
40. No prob. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inwiththenew Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
32. I was going to buy a 1000 shares back when it was around $1.50
Edited on Fri Jul-31-09 11:45 AM by inwiththenew
And I didn't. I have been kicking myself ever since, especially since a couple friends and family members did buy in at that price. My thinking at that time was to play it safe and hold on to more cash than I normally do. Great idea that was. Oh well as they say "Fortune favors the bold".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
33. I'm gonna call my broker and buy a million shares
right fucking now!!!
I'm gonna be rich!!!!!!!!!!





























Can anyone here lend me $8,000,000?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #33
34. CAN ANYONE PROVIDE EVIDENCE IT'S AT THIS PRICE????
Every quote I see it's still under $2.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
conscious evolution Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. In that case I'll buy 4 million shares
I'm gonna be even richer than god when its all over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. Where are you looking?
http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/f

All the quote engines I've looked at have it at or above $7.85
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. Yeah, Got It Now
It's "F" not "FORD".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. LOL...yup. FORD is "Forward Industries", a NASDAQ listing
and they are indeed at $1.58
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #42
46. D'OH!!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
47. Uh, Yahoo Finance?
Last trade was at 7.81. It's not like this is a state secret. This is freely available information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. There Was No Link In The OP
Read my other posts, I looked at the wrong symbol, made a mistake. Human and all, ya know? Maybe you take everyone's word at face value on the internet. Me, I like to check things out first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. My apologies. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
51. My theory is GM and Chrysler
Edited on Fri Jul-31-09 12:40 PM by AllentownJake
Ford made the smart move and did not take the bankruptcy option.

As such when GM and Chrysler were having problems Ford moved in on their market share for people looking to buy from an American company.

The same number of cars were purchased just one supplier benefited the most.

At 8 dollars I'd hold unless there is evidence that more people as a whole are purchasing cars

Common Sense 10% unemployment does not = more car purchases which is a capital asset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
54. Must be a Pinto, then.
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. LOL nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
56. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livetohike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
58. The investment club I belong to bought Ford at $2.16/share
(500 shares). Yay for us :-).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC