Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MN Bloggers File Ethics Complaints Against Republican Michele Bachmann

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 06:09 PM
Original message
MN Bloggers File Ethics Complaints Against Republican Michele Bachmann
MN Bloggers File Ethics Complaints Against Republican Michele Bachmann

By Logan Murphy Friday Jul 31, 2009 4:00pm

http://crooksandliars.com/logan-murphy/mn-bloggers-file-ethics-complaints-ag



Minnesota Republican Michele Bachmann has given us plenty of comedic fodder over the past few years. She's established herself as one of the most extreme, far right-wing members of Congress and is a constant source of embarrassment for both her party and the nation. Now, a group of Minnesota bloggers has filed an ethics complaint against her for partisan use of taxpayer money:

ST. PAUL, MINN – Jul. 29, 2009 – Minnesota bloggers Dusty Trice, Brian Falldin, and Aaron Landry filed an ethics complaint with the House Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) requesting an investigation into whether Rep. Michele Bachmann’s office has violated House franking rules pertaining to proper e-mail usage.

The complaint points out that an e-mail sent by Representative Bachmann’s office on May 26, 2009, advocates for the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA), a political organization, which is in violation of the House Franking Rules.

Aaron Landry, who first began investigating the story said, “Michele Bachmann is no stranger to NADA, they’ve been a strong donor to her congressional campaign committee.” According to campaignmoney.com, Rep. Bachmann has received approximately $13,000 from NADA since 2006. Thus, Rep. Bachmann’s ties to the organization establish a potential quid-pro-quo scenario.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Quid Pro Quo? Nonsense!
See, Rep. Bachmann just happens to believe deeply in the National Automobile Dealers Association. So much so that she's willing to give them free publicity on her franking nickel. It's not her fault that NADA is stupid enough to give her $13,000 when she'll vote their way anyway. See? It all makes sense. Nothing unethical here. See? See?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-31-09 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Once upon a time, I had a lot of respect for Minnesotans, being of Norwegian descent myself.
Edited on Fri Jul-31-09 06:30 PM by TahitiNut
I always enjoyed my visits to Minneapolis-St. Paul and enjoyed my post-Vietnam motorcycle trip, part of which traversed Minnesota from the Thousand Lakes region down to the southeast corner of the state. Following a meandering route, I never had a bad experience with anyone there and the state was beautiful, especially in the southeast.

After Jesse Ventura, Norm Coleman, Michele Bachmann, and Tim Pawlenty ... my respect for the people of that state has fallen dramatically.

If 'stupid' and 'corrupt' were packaged, their pictures would be on the label.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-01-09 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. "a constant source of embarrassment for both her party and the nation"
That's putting it mildly!

:kick: & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC