bain_sidhe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-05-09 11:30 AM
Original message |
Why publicans are against "cash for clunkers" |
|
My dearly beloved came up with the real reason - and I thought it was too good not to share. The real reason pubs are against cash for clunkers is that they know that the next logical step is a trade-in program for crazy congresscritters, in which citizens can turn in their old, crazy (repug) congresscritters for a bright, shiny, new (dem) one.
|
HopeHoops
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-05-09 11:33 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Republicans are against it BECAUSE IT IS WORKING! |
|
They want Obama to fail.
Some of the dealerships around here are running out of popular models. The local Ford dealer is totally out of the Focus.
|
Puzzler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-05-09 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. ... and because it's largely going to "regular" people. |
|
The GOP only likes govt. handouts if the money goes ONLY to the uber-rich.
|
wininboy
(111 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-05-09 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. And it shows people that Govt can work |
|
but it takes a Democrat to make it work
|
MADem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-05-09 11:36 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Because they'll only get $4.5K trade-in on that behemoth they spent way too much for? |
|
That's my guess. It ain't worth trading in that Pig Car they're driving, that they're still paying five hundred a month on, for the small, working/middle class rebate the program offers.
If the program had a sliding scale based on the original price of the car, up to ten grand, they'd be cheering like fans at the Superbowl. They're just pissed because they can't play without taking a bath, financially.
|
stuball111
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-05-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 11:38 AM by stuball111
Like a little kid... easier to just say no...and gas guzzlers=more oil=more profits=more campaign contributions to the GOP
|
elocs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-05-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message |
4. It's a dilemma for their "whatever it is, I'm against it" philosophy toward Obama. |
|
Oops, it works, Americans like it. Opposing it might mean that the voting public will hold them responsible if they hurt or hold up the program.
|
shiftingbaselines
(9 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-05-09 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. You should hear them squeal - here! |
|
A writer at Gas 2.0 lays out the connection with reversing the Bush Error Guzzler tax credits: http://gas2.org/2009/08/04/detroit-captures-market-share-of-dumped-clunkers/and they are piling on!
|
texasleo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-05-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message |
5. It benefits the middle and working class, and it helps the economy. |
marlakay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-05-09 11:37 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Only problem is the paperwork is a nightmare |
|
for the car companies, like any government job. My daughter is office manager of a large one and while she is glad they are selling more cars, she says the paper work on the employees (who get paid the same, its only the top owner and the sales guys on commission who gain on this) the poor office workers get hit with a nightmare.
They ought to make it in the program that all employees get a bit of the sale...
|
Puzzler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-05-09 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. That's surely up to the car companies how they pay their employees |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 11:40 AM by Puzzler
|
earthside
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-05-09 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
13. The other problems are ... |
|
... that it perpetuates Americans love affair with the automobile; it does virtually nothing to reduce greenhouse gases emitted by automobiles (the Hummer qualifies under this plan); and the money would have been better spent on urban mass transit and interstate rail.
|
sinkingfeeling
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-05-09 11:42 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Who was the GOP Senator I caught briefly on TV saying, "Why not give money for RVs? Why not |
redqueen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-05-09 11:43 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Because it wasn't their idea... just like they were aginst Clinton's anti-terrorism measures. |
|
Edited on Wed Aug-05-09 11:45 AM by redqueen
They don't care if it works... if it's a Democratic idea, they're against it.
Or... maybe for the same reason some people here are against it... who knows?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 01st 2024, 05:40 AM
Response to Original message |