|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Daveparts still (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 09:37 AM Original message |
Springtime for Inglorious Basterds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
1. K&R because the movie sucked! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 09:50 AM Response to Original message |
2. It was fine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 09:56 AM Response to Reply #2 |
5. It wasn't violent enough, too disjointed, and it was boring. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blogslut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:01 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Okay |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:35 AM Response to Reply #6 |
14. How was this movie thoughtful? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 11:05 AM Response to Reply #14 |
25. I could write a 10 page answer.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 12:03 PM Response to Reply #25 |
39. "original in what it is saying" Which was? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 01:17 PM Response to Reply #39 |
42. WW2 flicks dont have to be sepia, super serious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-29-09 01:47 AM Response to Reply #14 |
69. You'd have to be a thoughtful person to understand it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sherman A1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:05 AM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Agreed, with everything except the violence |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:38 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Knowing that violence is one of Tarantino's strengths, I expected more. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-29-09 01:52 AM Response to Reply #7 |
70. You hated the editing?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 09:53 AM Response to Original message |
3. You may want to add SPOILER ALERT, btw the article is pretty lame review |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Daveparts still (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:45 AM Response to Reply #3 |
17. So plot mechanisms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 11:10 AM Response to Reply #17 |
26. Because it is a movie. Name your favorite Fictional Movie.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Daveparts still (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 11:38 AM Response to Reply #26 |
33. Now you're Talking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 11:46 AM Response to Reply #33 |
36. Kubrick was able to make FMJ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Daveparts still (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 01:45 PM Response to Reply #36 |
48. Kubrick asked, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost Jaguar (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 04:29 PM Response to Reply #48 |
60. Kubrick was... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sherman A1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 01:32 PM Response to Reply #26 |
45. How about 1941 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 01:33 PM Response to Reply #45 |
46. All good, but not a zero sum thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sherman A1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 04:09 PM Response to Reply #46 |
53. Absolutely! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JVS (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 02:33 PM Response to Reply #45 |
51. 1941! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rebubula (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
4. Agree to disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:30 AM Response to Reply #4 |
13. The reviewer apparently expected a Fellini film going in. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:09 AM Response to Original message |
8. Agree with everything here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matariki (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
9. heard it was good actually. to each his own. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Morning Dew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
10. Haven't seen it yet but I saw 12 billion drive in movies in the 60s and 70s.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
11. ChickMagic and I were among the first to see it last Friday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:46 AM Response to Reply #11 |
18. Bingo..Not cookie cutter trash.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Daveparts still (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:51 AM Response to Reply #18 |
20. I understand a weak plot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:58 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Umm, which director was he paying tribute to in chapter 1? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Daveparts still (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 11:10 AM Response to Reply #22 |
28. S. Leone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 11:13 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. Did not watch it.. East bound and down (tv) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 11:00 AM Response to Reply #20 |
23. Try not to get a bloody nose in that rarified air. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-29-09 01:57 AM Response to Reply #20 |
71. I guess that's why it got an 8 minute standing ovation from critics at Cannes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paladin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-28-09 01:56 PM Response to Reply #18 |
66. Oh, Now I Get It. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
12. I think it's the best thing he's done since Pulp Fiction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ourbluenation (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:45 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. I thought it was better than PF. Enjoyed it immensly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:58 AM Response to Reply #16 |
21. You just said two things I've been thinking all week. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 11:11 AM Response to Reply #21 |
29. Waltz is amazing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-29-09 02:00 AM Response to Reply #16 |
72. I thought it was better than PF too. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 10:47 AM Response to Original message |
19. 90% of his peers disagree. he is the 5th dentist.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 11:02 AM Response to Original message |
24. Extraordinarily violent but numerous funny moments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Daveparts still (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 11:23 AM Response to Reply #24 |
31. I know I was Surprised |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 11:36 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. Well a lot of these stories took tremendous liberties with historical reality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 11:51 AM Response to Reply #32 |
38. "your insistence on playing it straight instead of seeing the parody...." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 04:25 PM Response to Reply #38 |
57. Bet he hates the Spielberg film 1941 as well... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 04:26 PM Response to Reply #32 |
58. Let me ask: Did you hate Spielberg's "1941"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
proteus_lives (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 11:10 AM Response to Original message |
27. Oh Piffle, I thought it was great. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 11:41 AM Response to Original message |
34. Sounds like the perfect double billing with "Top Secret" (with Val Kilmer) as the second show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
melm00se (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 11:45 AM Response to Original message |
35. Tarantino |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lost Jaguar (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
37. Why So Serious? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mr. Blonde (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
40. I think you missed the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
41. So you didn't understand that it was basically a comedy and homage to Spaghetti Westerns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Daveparts still (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 01:30 PM Response to Reply #41 |
44. That's Funny? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 01:56 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. You are somewhat illiterate if you think comedy and funny are the same thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheap_Trick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
43. God, I hate film snobs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Daveparts still (614 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 01:37 PM Response to Reply #43 |
47. Then as a Royals Fan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheap_Trick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 02:25 PM Response to Reply #47 |
50. You probably hated Star Wars, then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ddeclue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-28-09 01:32 PM Response to Reply #50 |
63. Well except that Volvo's are made in Sweden not Germany... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cheap_Trick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-28-09 02:04 PM Response to Reply #63 |
68. eh, whatever |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rebubula (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 04:19 PM Response to Reply #47 |
54. Credible??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
52. Quentin Tarantino is one of the most over-rated "creative minds" in a town... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 04:37 PM Response to Reply #52 |
61. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostInAnomie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 04:20 PM Response to Original message |
55. I think this could be one of the most facile and childish reviews I've ever seen on a movie. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ismnotwasm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 04:22 PM Response to Original message |
56. I'll watch it in a year or so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
59. I never go to the movies anymore. It's all crap. But I'll go to MM's film. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-27-09 04:40 PM Response to Original message |
62. Have not seen the film, but this is one hell of a poorly written review |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anigbrowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Aug-29-09 02:04 AM Response to Reply #62 |
73. Yes, there are numerous things wrong with it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Humbertink (24 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-28-09 01:37 PM Response to Original message |
64. Quentin Tarantino: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ieoeja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-28-09 01:42 PM Response to Original message |
65. I haven't seen the movie, but from the commercials I gathered it was a Mel Brooks' type of comedy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Aug-28-09 01:59 PM Response to Reply #65 |
67. Mel Brook's flicks were much more enjoyable than the demented bile Taratino feeds us. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:03 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC